this lady setting in the middle has no respect for the other opinions
she's laughing and making fun of other people's opinions
this is absolutely irreparable
Do families need fathers? Only lefties and weirdos claim they don't. This is a requested clip by: @MrHarryCole on Twitter and many others also on Twitter.
And every point that Jasmin made could be said about mothers too. So where do we go from here? See the stupidity and blatant patronising sexism in this question?
A suggestion like that wouldn't even leave the chalkboards since you would have raging feminist left, right and center coming at you for that my friend lol.
Would these questions even be asked if the government was not playing daddy with welfare, food stamps, forced child support or jail for the father. Get them out our personal lives. 2 people make a baby my tax dollars do not need to be taken to raise another person's child. That young girl talking about she does not need a father and having a bad dad's he does not need to be there, no one told these women to open your legs with that dude.
We all know what would happen if we asked that question. There would be worldwide outrage by women on large and manginas would`nt be that far behind either.
I agree. The answer is we should be asking neither question and stop trying to undermine traditional values, which young people are being brainwashed into believing is the progressive and intellectual thing to do.
Here is the problem with the UK :
Corrupt politicians in collusion with corporations making promises while
increasing their influence over the country for example allowing them to
establish monopolies and exploiting the working poor.
We have a stupid and drunk majority that is too blind to see that their
money is being stolen by the corrupt establishment. Instead of focusing on
this fact they run after the poor taxi driver as if he has their money
stashed in his trunk or the broke cleaner at mcdonalds as if their tax
money is in his bucket.
Don't know why you're secluding this to the UK - this is a global phenomenon.Politics, as a whole, is a dirty job - but a job someone needs to do. Of course a lot of them don't seem to be doing their job properly.
That footballer was later found innocent and it was proven that the girl,
had indeed lied. How is support a jury judicial system supporting 'rape
culture'. Presumably, the alternative that the obese women is demanding is
a totalitarian judge who bases his or her (her preferably) decision on
instinct rather than fact.
Britian is one of the most sexiest countries? What, more sexiest then those
countries that stone women to death for having sex outside of marriage, or
poor boiling hot oil on them? Damn, seems like they've gone to shit.
I class myself as a feminist, but a feminist with a pragmatic approach. YOU
CANNOT drop the rules of evidence and make it easier to convict in the
cases of rape. Radical feminists need to use logic and accept the fact that
you can't prosecute without hard evidence! I admire that they're so
passionate about the subject but they mustn't let emotion get in the way of
common sense.
+Busher50 I find it interesting you would attempt to dissociate yourself from "radical feminists." The truth of the matter is that all feminists are feminists whether their rules are "radical" or not, and average people who dislike "radical feminists" aren't going to care much for your brand of feminism either. Stop using "radical" as a smear tactic against feminists you disagree with. I most certainly am not a feminist/proponent of female supremacy, and watching you fight amongst either other only makes my day.
Joke's on you, Feminism is designed to Spawn radical Berta Lovejoys, otherwise it wouldn't be called FEMINAZISM, it would be called Secular Humanism, Egalitarianism, Humanitarianism, Equal rights activism, and so on. But no, the FEM was added to emphasize the obvious sexist nature of Feminism that has always opted to mask their designs of Female supremacy as equality.
And see, you're someone with a level head, someone that I can appreciate as a feminist, but honestly when I see that fucking label, I cringe and usually view them as a retarded shit head with skewed views on equality. That fucking clapping at the end of this video. Fuck that, man.
What if the women arguing against Peter Hitchens aren't actually radical feminist's like you believe? You feminist's seem to have a hard time understanding what's radical and what isn't in your own movement. The manhating mindset of these "radicals" could only come in to being through politcal agendas made by western civilization, basically they came from like minded people, which means it has to be a popular mindset. They don't just fall out of the sky like you seem to believe. New flash, there wouldn't be any "radicals" if they weren't fed lies by the education system and the media. By the way. What makes you different from a radical feminist? Is your idea of equality among the genders better than their idea of equality? Do they vote for a different political party? Do they use different rape statistics? No? Then what's so radical about them? I'd suggest you do some research on Swedish an French laws that have been passed by modern feminists, because in those countries, what you deem radical isn't radical over there. I may have been rambling a bit but you should get my point's.
World Humanist Congress: Plenary One - A.C. Grayling on Freedom of speech and freedom as such
World Humanist Congress | Freedom of thought and expression: Forging a 21st century enlightenment Plenary Session One Freedom of speech and freedom as ...
16:00 I don't think he's quite right on that one. Most people I know, don't
have a choice about politics or religion or any other ideology they've been
brought up with from an early age. The brain absorbs as a child and
afterwards, it's quite hard to let go and wonder into the unknown. It is
reasonable to call it human nature. After all, people are meant to survive
and breed, not to have doubts all the time. So people just mindlessly
repeat the same tape over and over again and it takes great skill to talk
them out of the ideology ingrained into them. The one exception is with
people who have been subjected to rational inquiry over and over again and
that happens very rarely.
I really dislike the fact as soon as Peter started talking about the
endocannabinoid system they just laughed and said "we'll google it
later"... It makes me quite angry because it's a classic example of how
uneducated people are on the matter. They think they know everything yet
they won't take him seriously. It's a never ending battle and I have the
upmost respect for him not giving up. Peace.
The reason the government and police care so much about the prohibition of
cannabis is not because it is a dangerous substance that makes people
aggressive and should be kept off the street, it is because dealers are
making money from an illegal market without paying tax, where I live in
Scotland the police are so relaxed about personal use that if you are found
to have a small amount they let you go without taking it from you.
Cannabis is so much safer than many legal drugs such as alcohol which can
damage the liver, kidneys and stomach. Of course cannabis can damage your
lungs if inhaled, all smoke has dangerous chemicals, the alveoli in our
lungs are very sensitive and can be easily damaged by chemicals in smoke
and can slow respiration as the lungs find it hard to take in oxygen if
their alveoli have been destroyed. The fact is Delta 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol
the active chemical in cannabis is not harmful in any way, it is simply a
chemical similar to those found in our body which belong to a group of
neurotransmitters called endogenous cannabinoids, these chemicals attach
themselves to receptors in the brain and nerve endings and can give a
relaxing feeling or cerebral uplifting high depending on the strain of
cannabis used.
Many researchers believe that CBD or Cannabidiol (which is legal in the UK)
has a wider scope of medical applications than its counterpart THC, I agree
with this as CBD acts more like a pain killer than a psychoactive drug,
instead of feeling a brain high the CBD binds to receptors in your nerve
endings rather than receptors in the brain.
Technically it is legal to use cannabis in the UK, but only if it is a CBD
strain with no THC (you can actually buy CBD or hemp oil online).
The government don't want it legalized as it would take money from the tax alcohol, tobacco and pharmaceutical drug companies pay them as it would replace some of the market for smokers and drinkers also it could take the place of many medications for depression or anxiety etc. But then again the dealers who illegally sell it don't want it legalized either as they are making money without paying tax.
+F4lloutBoy96's Channel you made a good argument for keeping it illegal .... surely if you are allowed to smoke cannabis and not be prosecuted as you rightly say ... then the only possible reason for legalising it in law would be so that large corporations , the same ones which most of these students moan about selling junk food and loans would be in charge of a mind altering drug
It really disgusts me that Tim mutters Hippies after seeing the Poll Bar
say more people would like to see cannabis used medically in the UK. It's
stereotypical Pricks like him that are making people continue to suffer.
I'm a keen smoker for both reasons and I think it's about high time we
follow in America's footsteps. Pretty sure the statistics and facts given
by US Politics and Law Enforcement that Crime has gone down and profits to
the tax office have gone up into the stratosphere. It almost makes me
ashamed to be British as we have slid backwards on the global social scale.
Get the cockroaches out of office and put some people with some actual
sense in the cabinet for once.
+shinjenriz im not you turd .... i'm saying you can use statistics to bullshit your way through anything .... just because you legalise murder and make the crime statistics amazing doesn't mean bad things aren't happening .... exact same with anything else such as canabis ..... 100% of all women that drink water will die , therefore people are putting chemicals in the water to kill women .... ofcourse im missing out how EVERYONE that drinks water will one day die