Toronto sun rate card Videos

I find it funny how there's one comment, but 9,000 subs. Huh

+BlackWing88 CyperNumber C39 Utopia Ray Victory won't be able to negate Tatsunoko's effect as Tatsunoko is unaffected by other monster's effects but chances are Utopia Ray Victory will be attacking over Tatsunoko anyway in that situation.

+Javier Sanchez Thanks! I'm currently working a build but I'm waiting on the release of Norden to enable more options. We will, however, have a build without Clowns within the next few days.--VIDEOBOX

+Keith Rosario Baxia has great synergy with Tatsunoko. The one flaw is that if you aren't running a decent amount of non-tuner Yang Zings, it's hard to find space for Baxia in the Extra Deck.

+Ricardo Salas Yeah, I can see it. I do plan to incorporate Jet Synchron later on.

+Boogie OTservers I have gone through so many builds since I put up the profile. Right now I'm in the process of trying out Transmodify plus by doing that the count on Elegy needs to rise a bit. Overall, that looks like an ideal opening and thanks for the comment.

+richard johnstun Late reply, was busy working on an upcoming Synchron Deck Profile. I would also bump up Elegy to 2 with Transmodify. I can see her coming up more often but you are right, the Aria play is to good. I think for now it is the more "effective" way to play the deck until we get new monsters. I already dropped Mozartaand cut Bloom Diva to 1 copy in the Extra Deck. I do like Bloom Diva but wish her effect would work on all monsters not just special summoned ones.

i run 2, i tend to see it in my hand alot but it is mostly because the transmodify play i run 2, i would think about dropping it but i think it is too good with aria, its hard to decide whether i want it or not though because if i take it out i will have 5 spaces open i dont know what i would replace. i dont do mozarta because you can loop sonata back around with schuberta and make bloom diva

Nice. I tested this build and will have an upcoming duel video vs Zefra on the channel. Since then I have been making changes to get more consistent boards. Going to test out Transmodify for that Elegy play; I'm just stuck on how many copies of her I should play at times. If the deck leans to level 4, that's not that bad.

that makes, i feel there are too many monsters to try it. i have been playing the deck for a little bit now, i got top eight occasionally, i like the transmodify into elegy play, now that everything is becoming level 4 the decks use of transmodify will begin to die off

+richard johnstun Your right on speeding up the deck. Originally, I planned to run a full set of Reasoning due to level range but declined. My reason lol was I would of preferred to play Galaxy Cyclone but at the moment I don't own any. I'll keep your Kuribandit suggestion in mind since it can grab a Powerful Rebirth of the excavation.

oh no problem. agreed that chicken game is iffy. but i started running 2-3 kuribandit because it picks up the speed of the deck enough to make needed plays

+richard johnstun Have not tried either of them yet. Hmm Kuribandit seems cool since it can help load the graveyard with Divas to be revived later. As for Chicken Game; I do like the draw part but feel like it will remain on the field during my opponent's turn. Thanks for the suggestions.

+imahentai Thanks, decided to try a new approach when filmed.It's working out alright but I can see myself completely dropping the high level Melodious monsters. I had all those extra special summoning cards in the back of my mind during deck creation. I might at Celestial Transformation because it has a cool use with Elegy since the side effected is nulled. Transmodify almost made the cut but I would need at least another Elegy to make the levels somewhat diverse. In that build I would not play the Mozarta. Photon Lead falls in the same category as Celestial Transformation although with a level restriction. Valhalla is the only one I do not physically own at the moment. When I do an update, I am sure some will be added.Once again thanks for the feedback, it really helps me out. Melodious needs ways to special summon since all the key effects are activated that way.

All good. We post card discussions, box openings, deck profiles, and other random content.

You're welcome, I told David about the channel, I might have to send him a link or something because he hardly ever goes on:p

+PokeGuitarist7 Hehe I knew you would point that part out. I had to include it for hilarity. Yuzu the waifu LOLThanks for supporting me on my Yu-Gi-Oh! side.

+finalstyle2 Just keep an eye out, you may see it in action soon!

Tier gets repetitive. I have played tier decks in the past so been on both sides. Right now my closest deck to use vs meta is Masked Hero but my other decks are Melodious and Madolche. Current;y, working on a Synchron deck with the new cards from Synchron Extreme.-PKMNmasterJuice from TeemTHE

+Teem THE thats really cool i try not to play tier one i feel it takes the fun out of the game what are your mains

We do play with a competitive mind set. Our deck profiles are on the "rouge" scale and we build them with the intention to take on meta decks.

I can come up with one and send you a list; haven't touched that deck in a long time. Jewlio replied here lol.

You got me thinking! (thats sometimes dangerous!). Wonder if we could determine how fast and far we could fling an itty bitty spacecraft ( well earthed , har har... ,er sorry) if we could harness one of these suns magnetic 'whips'. Imagine the effect it would have on such a comparatively mini object, lets say space shuttle sized, or hubble sized? Wow, it would be a super clean energy perfect for propelling objects that need such muscle. I know its an unlikely scenario but worth considering?

Its obvious it works independently to gravity as gravity always creates ball shapes (There are no square planets.) Maybe the ring shape is produced by part of the sun moving in such a way that the centre of that 'moved' part of the sun would have a circumference exactly defined by the ring shape of the filament. Ie for a short while there was a another separate sun within the sun whose centre of gravity tricked the plasma to move to a corresponding position for a brief moment. Aaargh!

I say its weird because gravity is holding the plasma ball, that the sun is made of, from just bursting out without any braking effect. That is one hell of a force because if the sun is one huge nuclear explosion/fission it is an explosion of unimaginable force which I would have thought lil old weak gravity (so weak I can jump up and lift stuff) would have no chance of withholding. Yet magnetic fields can spin flex and unfurl huge sheets of plasma independent of gravities power.

Yeah I know the theory but I have never seen a nuclear explosion that remains glued to the earths surface, if you see what I mean. There are infinitessimal simultainieous nuclear 'explosions (crude term, forgive) so it just seems very hard to believe gravity can tame such a dynamic, powerful force. Yet magnetism can hold huge strings of plasma right out side the body of the sun, make them do its will, whip, spin, flail it, with total disregard for big bully gravity. How come?

Hey, that's no problem. We can make it out of something that is unaffected by such temps, industrial diamond and ceramics.I think the metals they use for jet turbine blades are pretty robust and I was not intending to put anything living inside! I do apologise for appearing completely barmy but I am just trying to figure out a method of propelling our craft at speeds that make interplanetary movement a matter of months rather than years. There is a solution to every problem.

Lol. People love it but it is not a good thing for us earthlings! Its weird that gravity and magnetic filds are not one and the same. Are they at all related on a planetary scale, Professor Coconut?

Music should be of Wagner's?

+nickdasportsguy15 Indeed! Thanks for the comment!

+BreesNOAints Thanks for the comment. Yup take four was the winning ticket. Take one was 25 minutes. Way too long, who's going to listen to me talk for 25 minutes. lol 

Yeah Dykstra was a big chew guy. He actually got in trouble with MLB because he would spit in CF at the Vet and the Vet was astro turf so you can just imagine. Yuck.And yes GoT is awesome! Jon Snow is up there as one of my favorite characters with Arya and the Hound. Can't wait for Season 5!

+Dave's Mid Life Card Crisis Anthony, FunkyDiabetic1. (@user/FunkyDiabetic1)

+GumbyGold21 Thanks for the comment.

+lilmrhardcore Thanks!

+ASMagnuson97 Thanks for the comment Aaron!

+Ronald Wiseman And "jesus christ", the name most know him as....Brilliant scheme he had, making everyone think he was the "son of god".

+Katerpillarmusic No it's fucked up because he put the compass on metal like the utter retard he is

I should have written:when physicists liken reality to a hologram, they mean that the sum-total of it, including YOU and ME and PLANET EARTH, can be thought of as bits of info that could be stored on a 2d surface, just like a holographic plate -- this is basic blackhole physics...they certainly don't mean that we and the surface we stand on is real, while everything we observe from this position is fake. If you think the world about us is fake, then that would mean you also are fake since you are part of the world. Just shift your view of what reality is composed of...we ourselves, trees, Mt Everest, animals, water, air and even the space between planets, stars etc. is just bits of info. There is no big hologram OUT THERE, because it's RIGHT HERE and we are in it and composed of it. Physicists have no problem with this idea, just the hasty conclusions some draw from it.

There are two forces that drive us, they are the root of all others: fear and love. Now take a second, and try to decide which one conspiracies are derived from. It's like chasing ghosts, you might see something you really can't explain and suddenly a ghost or ghosts becomes the explanation to everything you can't explain, even if there are perfectly viable explanations that have more evidence and general consensus. Following ideas like this is how people drive themselves mad. It's cool to look at it from a "what if" perspective and let your mind wander a little, that's where creative ideas come from, but never let ideas like this shape your reality.I or you or anyone could put aside a few hours each day for a month a two and elaborate on some completely insane idea so that other people buy it... but understand that at it's root someone had a completely insane idea and tried to get others to believe it so they, other people, would fear that the world wasn't as it seems. But that makes sense; human beings by nature demand control and the recognition of others. When they don't have it, they try to control others by brainwashing them into there own fictional reality.Now, I hope you see where I'm going with this. How far down the line have fictional realities been created? That I think is a question that no one can answer, but saying that something so minuscule as the sky being an LCD screen is so in-probabilistic in comparison to the innumerable other ideas that could be the "true reality".If there even is one at all.And I'll leave you with that.

A conspiracy theorist isn't giving into fear.. That doesn't even make sense.. Your just assuming things while being a word smith and lumping everyone who thinks outside the box into one category.. Cmon bruh

...furthermore how the fuck did I end up here

keep spinning on your ball earth that you believe from the same system that started every war and I guess you no who blown up the twin towers!!

+Tim Scrivener Totally agreed

+Fran Toll my son all answers will come soon

+Fran Toll oh and this verse: (Genesis 1:1) "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."

+Dr Why The Bible tells us that Jesus is the SUN of righteousness. Here is the verse: Malachi 4:2 ¶ But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall." He also has wings...notice that too?

I didn't watch it all. That's why I said, I can't stand to watch it.

+Tim Scrivener So don't watch! Hwo or what brought you here?

it was doctor Wiley. haven't you heard the good word of the protomen?

+Sonny Cannon ..fact is nobody knows anything. We assume based on what we perceive and acknowledge. Humans will never crack the code to this complex existance we call life. It's interesting to see us tear the world to bits though.

+Anthony Pilcher Thanks for the compliment! And I enjoyed reading your comment here. Youtube is NOT the proper place for any in depth, and BOY, is discussing how we all came about is,,,, well,,,,,!!! I can give you a quick response for now to your questions for me. Most people are too biased to answer questions honestly! Because if we're HONEST,,, we all would have to accept the facts about our incredible UNIQUENESS, in the universe,,, and we ARE truly unique! We have yet to learn how very unique we are!!!! And, you can add how unique our lives are as well! Thew biological diversity on earth speaks for itself! The belief in evolution, is NOT a viable answer at all! In nfact, what evolution does is further prove that "intent",, intellectual "intention was and is evident in everything from a grain of quartz sand on the beach,, to a blue whale in the ocean,, to of course,,,, us! The main reason why all of those famous scientists from Galileo, Copernicus, Newton, Pascal, Faraday, and 50 others at least, thought the same was because then saw intellectual property rights, of sorts, lol! They knew that there was no human being capable of converting atoms, into you, me, and your Aunt Bea! But, yet,, that is exactly what happened! Max Planck (father of quantum physics) spoke on this and his speech is available for us to read. Could you make anything that exists already on earth? NO! Especially without anything to use as basic ingredients! Yet,, many people, non-thinkers actually,, seem to ignore these very reliable, and credible scientists, who have a "scientific pedigree",, and chose to use a very foolish excuse as there reason for non-belief in a Creator! Yet all these scientists saw earth, and its wondrous creations, something very worthy of crediting to some magnificent, and,,, benevolent force, or intellect! Especially because " intelligence/intellect" is seen in every single creation, and, "function of",, said creation! When someone, a human being, can convert atoms into all the matter in the periodic table of elements,, and then ANIMATE IT with life, as we have been,,, I will then denounce my belief in a Creator! But,,, no chance of that happening ANYTIME,,,,,!!! Take care!!!

Right. There is no doubt in my mind that an ultimate creator exists. I'm paraphrasing Descartes, but you'll know what I mean; If I can create a mental picture in my mind of what perfection is, and I can say something is not perfect, then perfection(a divine being of) must exist. That was the first meditation Sir and the foundation of modern thinking... We shouldn't still be questioning this centuries and centuries later, otherwise you're behind the curve. An idea of god was not in that train of thought you are referring to anyways so I have no idea where that came from... that is the basis of all my thinking dear sir. You seem like a very intelligent person and I can gladly say that I have taken something away from what you said, and I don't mean to attack you or your ideas, which are very good, but personally insulting as I think you interpreted what I said all wrong, and perhaps have a few gaps in your thinking.What I was saying is that we can create any number of ideas, but we become biased and single out our own in hopes that others will validate us, but lose sight of ideas that make sense (the ideas that generations before us had created). The idea of an LCD screen as the true nature of the sky is absurd to me, as in my own conscious being I have too many contradictions... follow? We could look up things and quote them all day, but actually store knowledge in your brain, as I know you do, but I hope others are reading, and you will begin to see the correlations these great thinkers had and understand singularity is the downfall of humanity that so many before us have spoken of. It's a state of comfortability (that will be a word soon) in thinking we know everything, where we stop thinking for ourselves entirely. THINK NEW THOUGHTS, TEST THEM, TRY TO VALIDATE THE IDEAS YOUR OWN INDIVIDUAL BEING CLAIMS ARE TRUE WHILE STAYING IN THE CONFINES OF SANITY. Those are my words. Quoting is to become another sheep(I hate to use that term) that heinously vomits the thoughts of others the exact way they (the original speaker) said them in fear that you will explain them wrong (but I have too). Why? because you're afraid of your own thoughts. THINK FOR YOURSELF, you Sonny, partially don't, at least in what you just told me. Some food for thought, I'll be paraphrasing of course and maybe now you can take something away from me and the thinkers before I:Einstein once said something to the effect of if an idea isn't absurd to begin with, then it isn't a very good one, while Twain said something similar , when I find myself thinking like the general populous I take a step back to reflect. While you said that god is the basis of their thinking, i agree, but I also think true thought is a fine line between absurdity and fundamental foundation (with the ideas stated in Descartes first meditation as its roots). I have yet to find reasoning to verify this idea in question, while it is certainly absurd. If you have a way to validate that the sky is an LCD screen then by all means enlighten me, until then, I'll view it as a fascinating work of fiction.

+Anthony Pilcher You obviously are a young person! LOL!!! Now for a kick in the azzz for you! I ask you,, how valid and worthy of relying upon, would you say the studies and works of people like: Galileo, Newton, Copernicus, Spinoza, Frances Bacon, Johannes Kepler, Rene Descartes, Pascal, Robert Boyle, Michael Faraday, Gregor Mendel, William Kelvin, Maxwell Planck, Einstein (and hundreds more,,,,,!) are??? Are you aware that all of these scientists/theorists/mathematicians believed in GOD?!?! FACT!!! Here is a copy/exerpt from a website: Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." You need to get off the atheist bullshit,, and open them eyes!!! As Max Planck ( father of quantum physics) said firmly in a speech given in Europe to his colleagues (in regards to the existence of matter): "There is NO MATTER, that just "so-happens" to exist! All matter is brought about by the vibration of atoms (which are ALL identical to one another. For instance, we could use "pennies", as an example,, as they are all identical (they're all pennies!),, and the frequency at which they vibrate is unique! The matter created by this vibration/frequencial constant, is what produces all the known matter in existence!" I advise you to read, and re-read what Einstein wrote here!!!!! How do you explain all of these scientists/physicists having a firm belief in a Creator?!?! Do you dare call them all fools??? I hope not,, for your sake!

+Tim Scrivener Scientists have found corrective computer code hidden in the superstring equations that explain our universe.It is the same corrective code used in our computers today.When a computer sends info to another computer, it sends extra ones and zeros in case something is lost in transit.If this is actually there, maybe we are a computer program.We could be the program or a copy or a copy of a copy.So, is the sky or firmament, actually a glass cover as the bible and many people believe ?Is the firmament or sky, us looking at the place where the creator or programmer resides.I am not saying anything is. I am only stating a few possibilities, that don't make the LCD screen all that ridiculous after all.

+Tim Scrivener Seriously. I can't believe how far this shit has come. People are living like primitive animals now, in fear of the things they can't immediately explain. This is how societies have fallen in the past, and how cave men went extinct when they decided to stay put and feared leaving their small inhabited area. Just wait until someone comes up with an insane theory that convinces a majority of the population... and I guarantee modern humanity will have the same fate. The dumbest thing is when they tell people to "open their minds to the possibility" and they fail to realize they are closing them to every single other idea, including the ones that actually make sense and don't harm society.