Home » Video » ...

Malibu worst car Videos

2009 chevrolet malibu water leak 1

Worst car ever looks nice through the outside only.

User Comments

Jeff Walter commented on 01 Oct 2015

I have the same problem I'm working on fixing I Googled the problem a guy on there jackd6 says he fixed it using waterproof tape and rubberized silicone and almost a year later no problems.I just Googled 2008 malibu water in passenger floor board and I found him in the malibu forum seems like a common problem with them but GM acts dumb about the whole situation.I took mine to two different GM dealers and neither of them would fix it I even gave them a TSB number I found for it on the Internet also made a call to GM customer service and they said if they can't duplicate the problem they can't fix it.Pretty shitty answer to a customer with problem of the product they designed and engineered if GM can't fix something they created who the hell else is supposed to.

alejandro garcia commented on 14 Sep 2015

I found this this person got it fix i haven't hat the time because is a little hard but not impossible . You have to go underneath the car, is pretty congested. I try different ways and the only way i figure out is taking the heat shield of and going through there.

oscar ruiz commented on 13 Sep 2015

did you fix that leak , I'm having the same problem

alejandro garcia commented on 14 Sep 2015

I'm trying to send you a picture

eddie rosa commented on 05 Feb 2016

burn that shit!!

Worst Rap Battle - Most Wanted Malibu

This is a clip from the movie Most Wanted Malibu. All credits goes to the movie makers and cast.

Worst car guy ever

User Comments

Lawrence Martinez commented on 07 Apr 2014

C Roberts I'm working in it

2009 chevrolet malibu water leak 2

Worst car chevrolet , there cars suck. I had to take the carpet out twice. I went to the dealer twice and they told me that it was past the 36000 miles it had 47000 ...

All-New 2016 Malibu: Sneak Peek | Chevrolet

From the award-winning Malibu comes the all-new 2016 midsize sedan that knows no boundaries. See how the all-new Malibu is tested to handle the world's ...

User Comments

Jeremy 716 commented on 28 Mar 2015

ford will be unveiling there new taurus soon and it will wipe all competition out

ghd bfb commented on 07 Apr 2015

+mkvl1490 fusion already did that new update to the fusion in 2016

mkvl1490 commented on 03 Apr 2015

+Jeremy 716 taurus doesnt compete with the malibu

Dominic Kirkwood commented on 20 Mar 2015

I can't wait for the new Malibu I got to buy it

TMT commented on 20 Mar 2015

Good

Jamessr23 commented on 13 Mar 2015

Makes me want to buy a Subaru STI

Dennisha Dickerson commented on 01 Oct 2015

+Evan Ganske fq sc3

Evan Ganske commented on 15 Mar 2015

Well, you're dumb.

Wesley commented on 13 Mar 2015

better not be fwd

Evan Ganske commented on 15 Mar 2015

Of course it is; don't be an idiot. The 2015 Buick Regal (which is FWD) was the picked as the best sports sedan by CR!

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo commented on 12 Mar 2015

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAS!!!! is that AWD I see?

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo commented on 19 Mar 2015

+Evan Ganske It's not I've watched it like 20 times and how would that even make sense? The car is supposed to be driving not the platform, you can clearly see the rear wheels start spinning,

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo commented on 15 Mar 2015

+Evan Ganske No it's not look at it.

Bobby Wisdom commented on 12 Mar 2015

SHOW US THE 6TH GEN CAMARO!! GIVE THIS A LIKE SO CHEVY KNOWS WE HAVE WAITED LONG ENOUGH!

know1tv commented on 13 Mar 2015

+Bobby Wisdom //www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=399414

Bobby Wisdom commented on 12 Mar 2015

C6?

Bobby Wisdom commented on 12 Mar 2015

Source?

know1tv commented on 12 Mar 2015

Wait for the Indy 500. That is where it will be revealed. That has been confirmed.

Chevrolet Malibu Maxx quick 0-60 & Select Shift Mode Demo

2005 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx Tried to do a Quicker run and just a quick demo of the Select shift mode. This is a very smooth rideing car. Has lots of room in front ...

User Comments

Intechdude300 commented on 16 Jan 2011

@TVdinnerFTW it was for keeps but got rid of it a few weeks later. Didnt like the interior quality, the electric steering & sometimes the car would shudder a bit at a hard takeoffs like from a light or stop sign. Possible valve body issue in the tranny which could've lead to bigger issues later. In the 02 Continental now.

beammark commented on 30 Jan 2011

my mom has one of these and it is NICE! i had to put a turbo on my pinto cuz i cant have my moms car having more power thats just crazy haha

Bad Drivers In Cedar Rapids commented on 06 May 2015

I drive a truck but my mom has this car and when you used manual did you start from first gear? because when I do 0-60 its way faster???

Joe Mamma commented on 23 Oct 2011

The maxx SS has a bigger engine, more power, and hydraulic steering. MUCH better car.

crazycarlisleboyz commented on 01 Jul 2013

That car does not have no where near 200 horsepower

1959 Chevrolet Bel Air VS 2009 Chevrolet Malibu

User Comments

myphonyaccount commented on 22 Apr 2010

@Supergungun There are plenty of new cars with lots of legroom and big trunks. The dashboards come out farther and there are center consoles, people sit lower, but they are very comfortable on long drives unlike old cars which were notorious for driver fatigue. If somebody is so obese they can't fit into a modern car, maybe they have lifestyle and health issues that need to be addressed rather than demanding bigger and fatter cars to accommodate their problems.

myphonyaccount commented on 21 Apr 2010

@Supergungun There is nothing unattractive about body color rubber moldings when designed with some integration and flair. Old cars had worlds more style, but none of the practicality of modern cars. The realities of cost, space, fuel economy and safety are ones that should never be trumped by style. However, there are plenty of attractive cars that meet all the practical requirements, just not as glamorously as a 59 Cadillac.

Lil Lotte commented on 08 Mar 2010

@myphonyaccount millions have died in modern cars too. I mean look at the stuff w/toyota/gm going on right now. that hasn't reached huge numbers...yet. shouldn't be happening. not to mention stupid people driving wreckless cause 99% of wrecks anyways, not the cars, the drivers. the "safer" they make cars the more idiots like you think they're immune to getting hurt. especially assholes in SUV's.

myphonyaccount commented on 20 Apr 2010

@Supergungun This test is not of a 1959 Cadillac, which weighed over 1,000 pounds more than these two cars. But if you want, go ahead and run your 59 Cadillac into a new Cadillac which weighs only 600 pounds less. The new one will cream the old one - even if it were new off the assembly line. Old cars simply were not designed for safety. Argue and deny it all you want.

myphonyaccount commented on 15 Nov 2009

All the car collector idiots running around insisting old cars are safer just make themselves look really stupid. They say the IIHS is a corrupt organization that got paid by chevy to do this test, they say IIHS sells airbags, they have all kinds of conspiracy theories but really, the truth hurts, they own crappy old cars and don't want to admit it.

myphonyaccount commented on 20 Apr 2010

@Supergungun Old car fan idiot, you are wrong once again. Old cars did NOT have more kinetic energy than new ones. That is not why old cars killed more people than new cars. More kinetic energy means more weight. The 09 Malibu and 59 Bel Air weighed virtually the same. You should come out of denial and get some education.

myphonyaccount commented on 21 Apr 2010

@Supergungun A new 09 Malibu that weighs the same as a 59 Bel Air is obviously not made of plastic. Plastic doesn't weigh that much. The difference is new cars use the metal smarter in areas where strength is needed, in the skeleton, not as trim, or extra thick sheet metal that doesn't protect in a crash.

myphonyaccount commented on 20 Apr 2010

@Supergungun Denialist, if you look at the overhead shot, you can see the cars hitting each other where frame rails would have been. It was a fair fight. Stop sounding like some angry southerner upset that the north won the civil war and that now he will have to do his own manual labor.

myphonyaccount commented on 14 Apr 2010

@KotoNPoto Far fewer people die in newer cars than they did in older cars. Toyotas current problems are temporary and solvable by putting it in neutral. American car makers have more safety recalls than Toyota. It just sticks out more when Toyota has one.

myphonyaccount commented on 21 Apr 2010

@Supergungun It's not greed, it's waste. Metal trim dents and causes damage to the other car. Rubber absorbs impact and doen't cause damage to either car. Metal trim also weighs a lot and that wastes gas. We can't drill our way out of massive consumption.

Barry Robinson commented on 22 Apr 2010

@myphonyaccount @myphonyaccount New cars are all the same and have no soul. I'd rather have a soul than drive a POS jelly bean. PS Rubber molding dries out in the sun, cracks, and falls off leaving the metal underneath vulnerable to rust.

myphonyaccount commented on 20 Apr 2010

@Supergungun If you look at the overhead shot you can clearly see the 59 is hit very near it's middle point which means it's pathetic X frame rail was also hit. It was just a poorly designed vehicle for safety, that's all.

myphonyaccount commented on 22 Apr 2010

@Supergungun If your soul is defined by the car you drive, then you never had a soul. And you're sticking to old notions about old rubber moldings because you want to believe them. New cars are better. Try one, you'll see.

myphonyaccount commented on 25 Dec 2011

Surface rust, dirt and paint dust are different from structural rot. X frames and unreinforced A pillars are just shoddy engineering. They simply didn't care about safety until liberal regulations made them care.

Crash Test 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air VS. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu

User Comments

clemsonbloke commented on 31 Mar 2010

This makes me wonder if that is only a model of a 1959 made out of todays plastic. I have never seen one of these old cars collapse that easy. Besides where would they find a classic car just to crash it? Also why a 1959 and not a 1960 or something else? I think this is a fake 1959 replica made out of plastic.

lemy fairlane commented on 26 Dec 2014

It is a lie 59 impala 1) had no motor.2) seats were loose because if not salen.3) were all armed for someone to break saw how Impala chassis and a Sidewinder can bend metal .4 immense clouds of rust are leaving the old impala

lemy fairlane commented on 26 Dec 2014

myphonyaccount you're a wtf, old cars are beautiful and will never stop like, this video is a lie was all armed had no engine 59 cars now are ordinary

myphonyaccount commented on 13 Sep 2011

Old cars were crap. Lots of steel, but not meant for safety.

bigfancycar commented on 08 Apr 2010

No, it's a real original car in good working condition.

gtjoe351 commented on 21 Dec 2011

Its good to see two more Chev's off the road!!!

Agufish commented on 30 Oct 2015

Damn! :(

Link for boards:

Link for your site:

Current link: