Italy map detailed Videos

BF1942 Gamespy Solution

+stzrs Thanks! I wasn't sure and couldn't find the confirmation anywhere.

you get damage to everything in fight cave if you have jad task

+RsRogie They have just a little bit, I just did it yesterday

+Arthur Serkov On Oldschool they haven't changed.

+Blaine Robbins Thank you! I hope it helped. :)

+Clay Zeigler osbuddy, its a combat overlay

hey bro its all good. I've been playing RS for 10 years (since 2005 when fight caves was released) and I've never gotten a fire cape. It isn't mandatory :)

I quit rs 3 months ago lol

I did Jad the other day, and I was lucky enough that we was at the italy rock, I shot one healer that was behind jad.  Somehow he managed to get between jad and the rock and starting hitting me

+jack davis He stomps for range, and just rears like a horse for mage. If you wait for the sound for range, youre dead.

@StormoftheNorth I like cutting-edge graphics, great gameplay, AND story. Why crap on graphics when some games prove that you can have it all (the Total War series comes to mind, although you might not agree)? Besides, the graphics in Hearts of Iron 3 are very beautiful, even though their are hand-painted instead of 3d rendered. It's all in the eye of the beholder, is what I would tell anyone who disagrees with you and me.

Games with good graphics make a great first impression. Games with good gameplay make a great lasting impression. Both graphics and gameplay can be very important in a game. Don't shun graphics, because they can do more to improve the gaming experience than you'd think. Of course that's not to say that having good gameplay is pointless, nobody would want a game that's frustrating to play, then graphics wouldn't do a thing.

u have to have like 2 troops in two def territories. they are both adjacent to an enemy territory. u click one and hit 'support attack' and the other attack. if they win, the one u hit attack with will advance while the other stays put. the only way to 'kill' an enemy army is to surrond it (in ur territory) or drop its strength to zero (bombing attacks)

This is very true, to much is made about graphics these days, don't get e wrong i love new games i'm completely adicted to battlefield bad company for example. But i enjoy the thought and strategy that goes into playing a game like this....besides this game has a hell of alot better graphics than strategic Commander for example.

Is this game just like europa universals III? If so, does it have annoying things in it like your troops dying off if you got too many troops in a region? or having to have ridiculously huge armies just to win a war, in which most just die before any combat because of troop number limits in a region?

@satjathamma this is a grand strategy game mate, COH is real time completely different. Your not much of strategy player are you? for you to make a comment like that its quite obvious. Its not just about being historians its about being a mature gamer.

@Horsvin I know. While I don't mind them, graphics shouldn't be the 'main course' of the game. Good core gameplay is what it is about, I'd look at some paintings for visual appeal. Ecxellent graphics are nice but all I ask for is legibility.

Maybe it's just me, but as much as I've tried, I simply haven't been able get into HOI3. I've barely touched it since late last year. Conversely, I absolutely loved HOI2 and played it to death for a period of about 3 years. Oh well....

@Horsvin : Well what's nicer to see is nicer to play. I mean, now there are alot of games with awesome graphics, that's why people expect to see awesome graphics everywhere. However good graphics doesn't mean good game... :)

well it dosent seem hard a few hours and anyone can get the hang of it theses guys on here make like its an acient art at learning to play this game all games can be learned sirs!!!! all so dnt worry youll guys be fine

@Horsvin No they don't need and they don't have. How ever the graphic would not be the last thing you would want it is always better if the game looks good then bad if it has reasonable requirements.

@Horsvin that doesnt mean that people are stupid. nowadays there are so much oportunities and ways to design a game. i think a good game should have good graphics and an awesome strategic gameplay

@StormoftheNorth I do it with about 70$ I want cutting edge graphic , but if the gameplay is good enough a bit outdated graphics will do and this game does not have any graphics but I love it :P

+Hal Swann Agreed, he doesn't know what he is doing. I am WAY late on this video but I must agree. Every video he keeps on saying he's gotten better with commanding and continues to do the same thing. When you want the Infantry to move, you put them in melee mode so they won't aim, then you move them. You also have to fire fast once they present or they won't hit anything. Keeping them aiming lowers their accuracy. Watching this is really boring when he doesn't even know how to make a line hold. Then again, I'm way late.

SARGENT ARTHUR SIR!

Lol

+ReformistTM Has it been updated recently? What is the latest version?

+ReformistTM Has it been updated recently? What is the latest version?

+ReformistTM Really? Never could have guessed hehe :)

+TheBranchez Light & Darkness is one of my favorites : )

+ReformistTM When finished this mod will be epic. One of the best mods for warband for sure. I don't see that happening anytime soon tho. The latest version is still a long way to go from playable version :/Ohh and I always wanted to ask you, what mods do you play when you are not recording? If you know what I mean. The mods you play for yourself and not for YouTube :) What is your favourite one?

+Neil McAllister As this was a Special Feature, meaning a showcase of the mod's features there will not be a Part 3 but there may be a full series in the future. Perhaps you would like to explore the channel for another series you might enjoy!

i think you misunderstand. I love these vids, I just dislike the use of that word.And I actually was on a trip with limited wifi.

+Tani Greene I see, you have searched the internet for two days to find a dictionary that doesn't have it. Good for you! :) Because, what is more important than berrating someone who tries to make high quality content and just wants his viewers to have a good time, right? I wish people would put that much effort in making this world an actual better place and be nice to each other instead of trying to put each other down.

Mirriam-Webster, however, does not have it. :P

+Tani Greene I made sure to link two sites as I knew you would complain about the wiktionary one.Thanks for watching : )

yeah, sorry, this has just been slowly building up since everyone seems to use it.And I wouldn't site wikipedia for a source :P

+Tani Greene Getting a little too upset about such a minor thing aren't we? https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sieging#English//www.thefreedictionary.com/siegingAlso you may want to refrain from using caps in a public internet domain such as this, it can come across as rude or "shouting," just a little etiquette : )

It's because its single player XD

Like the sweds charging the Russians?