Moore oklahoma unemployment office Videos

• 1. Summer In Oklahoma
• 2. CO - Ex-offenders forced into homelessness due to draconian laws
• 3. INFOWARS News Headlines For Monday July 22 2013: Links In The Description
• 4. Hurricane Sandy News Conference - Governor LePage Urges Mainers to Play it Safe
• 5. Koth and Gregory PC Law Firm, Legal Advice, Bloomington, IL
• 6. Gluten Free Lifesyle
• 7. Escort Says Wall Street Executives Lacking In The Bedroom
• 8. Rachel Maddow Questions Tom Coburn's Wild Claims

Summer In Oklahoma

User Comments

Ad Astra commented on 21 Dec 2013

Nice work! You should check out some of our work we are from Muskogee. Maybe we could work together in the near future?? 

Shel Wagner commented on 02 Sep 2013

Bravo! Well done!! Really inspiring...

CO - Ex-offenders forced into homelessness due to draconian laws

User Comments

coloratura1229 commented on 28 Jun 2011

This is definitely a dilemma. That is why measures must be taken to reach "at risk" children with early intervention programs so that they do not grow into this sort of life.

INFOWARS News Headlines For Monday July 22 2013: Links In The Description

Hurricane Sandy News Conference - Governor LePage Urges Mainers to Play it Safe

Koth and Gregory PC Law Firm, Legal Advice, Bloomington, IL

Gluten Free Lifesyle

Escort Says Wall Street Executives Lacking In The Bedroom

Rachel Maddow Questions Tom Coburn's Wild Claims

User Comments

iamavet commented on 24 Dec 2010

Rachel, Rachel --- another 1/2 truth from MSNBC. Washington Post: "Coburn didn't attend that hearing, which undercuts his argument. But there wasn't a mark-up of the legislation or a vote in the committee. It was brought straight to the floor. So Coburn was partly right and partly wrong: There was testimony, and you can argue there was debate. But there wasn't the sort of debate you'd get in a mark-up, and the bill didn't go "through" a committee."

tishhead commented on 24 Dec 2010

@iamavet oh please. you will need a much, much better example than this one. he tried to portray this bill as a rush job when clearly it wasn't. if you want to debate what constitutes "going through" a committee in the face of coburn's blatant dishonesty, you do it at risk of your own credibility. rachel was about 90-plus percent correct. coburn was about 2 percent correct.

tishhead commented on 24 Dec 2010

@iamavet a mighty small figleaf for the doctor. he also complained that it's being forced through at the end of the year when he knows that's because the repubs have blocked it for a year. he also said he wanted to "spend whatever it takes" to help the first responders, then insisted they cut money from it. defending this man is not a winning proposition.

iamavet commented on 24 Dec 2010

Sorry to disappoint you but I could care less for Coburn or the 911 responders debate. There are just as many 1st responders in all cities and NY responders are only one of them. Rachel may be popular with the Progressives because of her 'red meat' news but she continues twist facts or only report 1/2 the news.

iamavet commented on 24 Dec 2010

@tishhead Not defending anyone. I am getting sick of "news' programs twisting the facts so they can play 'got ya' for laughs or make points. I have noticed almost every Rachel show, there are 1/2 truths. It is time she get called on it. Maybe her subtitle should be 'Toyko Rose'.