Lynne Baab: Why Listening Matters for Mission and Ministry
This is a public lecture Lynne gave at the University of Otago on 16 September 2014. In it, she discusses the research she did on listening which grew into her ...
Here's some constructive feedback. Nobody cares.
Incredibly poor quality sound, very boring.
Lynn University Baseball vs Saint Leo Recap
Mike Diorio Lynn University baseball.
Obama On Libya Coalition | 2012 Presidential Debate #3 | Ora TV
Democratic President Barack Obama & Republican candidate Governor Mitt Romney discuss the Libya coalition during the third 2012 Presidential Debate.
Gene Cross Talk
"Gene Cross Talk” was produced by Lynn Fellman, Fulbright Senior Scholar to Israel, in collaboration with Prof. Dan Mishmar, an evolutionary geneticist at ...
Elizabeth Holmes Mission | Full Interview Fortune MPW
The extraordinary entrepreneur on Fortune's June cover explains her mission and opportunity ahead Want to see more Fortune Video? Subscribe to our channel ...
Are you listening really to what she's saying? 7:45 Question: how does your
technology really work technically? Answer: we believe in empowering
people...WOW...A heart touching emotionally engaging non-answer.The very
method of using finger prick blood invalidates many blood parameter
testings. Every one please re-read your first year physiology book. Why do
you think she has all the Washington heavy weights on the board and not
real scientists. She is the Madoff in biomedical. For those who disagree,
please invest your money in her company or use her blood test services
exclusively, you will have amazing outcomes!
+quasar Ok, Got you . Lets see, with time passing we will get to knw if its a revolution or she has an ulterior motive. I understand the military may be involved with this.
yea but using the proprietary excuse is all well and fine if she doesn't want FDA approval.They have lived in secrecy (not a luxury common for a medical diagnostcs company) and raised a ton of cash quietly. Also can you explain why a biotechnology co has the likes of henry kissinger and ex-military on the board. You think she was the first genius to bring the idea of mini-blood draws to make the whole process portable? There are serious limitations to that type of blood drawing. They ran their own samples on Sieman machines and diluted their samples to run them on standard machines.
+quasar Its proprietary so maybe that's why she doesn't want to reveal it. If the testing methods are not effective that would also be out soon. Outfit doesn't decide anything. What are you delusional ? I hope you got my point.
+S ABS thank you for summing it up so precisely. This is comedy and fashion at its best. It would be hilarious if she wasn't dealing with medical diagnostics. She wears the steve jobs outfit. She doesn't sound well versed in medicine or laboratory science for someone proposing to revolutionize the system.
+quasar Yes, very well said, its quite possible that it is such an attempt. But think if this technology is successful and reliable , then it can help millions or billions of people throughout the earth, so lets just wait and see.
I get your point as well. I was just being flip insulting her. The WSJ investigation might be an attempt by established players in the market to hold to their market share. So we'll see....
+quasar Ok, fine. I got your point. If there are issues let it come out. I am not like a blind follower or fan if you think something like that. I'll check out Wall Street Journal.
+2010cyberguy read up on theranos and the wall street journal and you might re-examine her grand ideas. But I never thought she was faking it I was just pointing out that if she was what the reasoning behind it would be. There are serious issues with theranos tech and how they have been running their comparative studies.
+quasar She is not faking it. She does not have to, she has grand ideas, which has transformed into a successful company as u see it. You are thinking at a very basic level. Faking voice and all that is not really required.
+Gio Biocampo shut up dummy, his objective is to point out that if she is forcing her voice lower to sound more authoritative or male it belies a strong underlying insecurity. If that's her real voice than its a moot point.