Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?

Cameron university password reset Videos

‪Update your link blue password self-reset questions‬

This video demonstrates the process University of Kentucky users need to follow in order to update their link blue password self-reset questions.

Resetting your forgotten link blue password

This video demonstrates the process University of Kentucky users need to follow in order to reset a forgotten link blue password, including changing your ...

Web Workshop: Divestment Theory of Change

Meet the Fossil Free national campaign team & dig in deep around the fossil fuel divestment campaign's theory of change. Why divestment? How will it get us ...

User Comments

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-4h_UJD78Eyw/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAA8/MTsB294xeFs/photo.jpg?sz=64
First of all, I love this movement, and want to contribute more. I don't think either side is properly stating uncertainties around investment portfolios. It seems there are two camps: 1) Some say, absolutely, that the exclusion of any one sector is bad for a large portfolio, regardless of what it is, and they use this reason against divestment. 2) Some say that inclusion of fossil fuel (coal, oil, gas) is bad for portfolio, due to carbon price risk, stranded assets, etc. and they use this reason for divestment. I don't think either camp can ever say absolutely (i.e. with 100% uncertainty) that their answer is the right one. For instance, one could imagine a scenario where governments continue to postpone action on climate change (so there is no increased 'carbon risk'), and we end up living in a fossil fuel economy for the foreseeable future, and therefore a fossil fuel portfolio would still perform well. This awful scenario has a probability, however small it is. But neither camp is putting uncertainty bands around their statements (to my knowledge), and I think we should move to do that, to quantify things more clearly, even if it's just our best guess at this point. What are your thoughts on that? (note: this focuses purely on financial arguments, and not moral ones)

PHONE HACKING BY USA GOV, OBAMA, SCOTISH GOV, for lobbying with Iranians governments?

Mr David Cameron UK Prime minister, UK LORDS, MP's. Police crime report:CAD:86401/21/10/2014 and: CAD:4274/22 0/2014 and CAD:8640/24/10/2014 ...

User Comments

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-a0eoQ-LAwLs/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACw/WuEepG22M1k/photo.jpg?sz=64
Dear Matthew Offord, hi 25/10/2014 Copy to: Mr David Cameron UK Prime minister, UK LORDS, MP's. Police crime report: CAD:86401/21/10/2014 and: CAD:4274/22/10/2014 and CAD:8640/24/10/2014 SUBJECT: PHONE HACKING BY USA GOV, OBAMA, SCOTISH GOV, for lobbying with Iranians governments? Since August I find my landline phone is hacked I can't call my family or they can't call me! when I ask my phone and internet service provider I find they are behind of phone hacking and using me to lobbying with Iranian gov.. with Mr Obama USA President (flat 56.) and Scottish government which want get independent from UK (Flat 49.) 2 lady police officer (POLICE no:729 and another lady officer) come my home but this is anti terror and cyber police team job to investigate. I'm so glad to meet this 2 lady police officer and I hope they will help me and my kids and family, in London out of this matter. Scottish gov.. want use me to against UK and torturing me to get more info about my kids mum which still in camp LIBARTY IN IRAQ WITH PMOI. I'M BRITISH BUT NOT SAFE IN MY OWN HOME BECOUSE THSES 2 GOVERNMENTS (USA AND, SCOTLAND.) WANT USING ME FOR DEALLING AND LABYING WITH IRANIAN GOVERNMENTS! THIS IS TERRORISEM ACTIVITY BY THSES 2 GOVERNMENTS! PLEASE STOP THEM AND KEEP ME AND MY KIDS AND FAMILY SAFE! I'M DEAD MAN HEAR! ANY EXCUTION IN IRAN I'M BEEN EXCUTED HEAR TOO! ANY TERRORIST ACTIVITY WITH IRANIAN GOV I'M BEEN SHUT TOO! TO KEEP UK GOVERNMENTS YOU HAVE TO TAKE SCOTISH GOV TO COURT OF JUSTICE, FOR TOURTIRING ME TO GET DEALL WITH IRANIAN GOVERNMENTS! THIS IS FACT OF TERRORISEM! I’m looking forward to hearing from you.

Liam Carrigan Union Board Interview

0:00 What is your name, degree, year of study, age, slogan and colour? 0:27 Who is/are your campaign manager or managers? 0:40 Are you aligned with a ...

DEF CON 11 - Gregoire Gentil - Hack Any Website

Gregoire Gentil - Hack Any Website Hack Any Website This session will learn how you can hack any website whatever its protection. The most basic and simple ...

Climate Myths Heat Up Global Warming Debate | Debunker | NBC News

The University of Michigan's Paul N. Edwards untangles some misinformation around our warming planet and the repercussions. » Subscribe to NBC News: ...

User Comments

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-4Mv25vtYszI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAABYc/1a4fAno7nVA/photo.jpg?sz=64
Half the warming in the past 150 years happened in the past 50 years and was caused by man, but the other half of the warming before that was cause by...??? How do you say "warming has stopped, but it hasn't cooled much either?" without letting on that warming has stopped? You say: "hottest decade on record." The missing atmospheric warming for the past 17 years is in the oceans? If it is it will stay there - 2nd law of thermodynamics. But 1) there is no evidence for that, 2) the models had predicted atmospheric warming. Temperature data does not by itself predict warming. The models (upon which the alarm is based) are what predicted more warming, and they failed at that. Predictions of catastrophe from a few degree temperature rise is pure speculation. "outside the safe zone by mid century:" pure speculation. Smug pieces like this, by being obviously unscientific, weaken the credibility of climate science.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Myth #2: Global warming has stopped. "Not even close"...? Is that a scientific standard? Actually, its very close to a true statement. As in, its been 17 years without an upward trend. The temp rise in the oceans are so small it's hard to tell how much energy is going in or out. The models did not predict a pause. What if past warming was merely oceans shedding heat then. We dont know, the models can't simulate any of it. You know, the models that tell us that there will be a catastrophic warming in the future. 
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Myth #1: "...based upon simulations". No one is arguing that measured temperatures are based upon simulations. Temps rose 1.5F. "We know why: it's because of man" - a conclusion based upon simulatuons!!!! Our lack of understanding of the climate leads to, "well we weren't able to model any other temp rise effect, so it must be CO2 (minus the aerosols so it will be much hotter later). This is a lazy wamist speaking in an echo chamber. Act like a scientist will you?
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
The cost of doing nothing will be much, much LOWER. (See Copenhagen Consensus Project if you want to see the numbers) And you can sleep better because billions of people will be lifted out of abject poverty by using energy that exists. Its immoral to stifle development of the worlds poor. Something I don't quite think limousine liberals fully grasp. 
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-eFAjYyEYYg4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABs/V89lZLwzEpI/photo.jpg?sz=64
CLIMATE CHANGE..the greatest HOAX since human evolution!
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-bGPUOxDIzE4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADoE/_Jy977AytpI/photo.jpg?sz=64
The data is worthless, if it has been manipulated.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment