And the video ends right before every rouge Hunter descended on them in a
hail of gunfire. Going rouge and getting into manhunt are barely worth it,
only make about 700 DZ credits if you survive, and if your going after
people with gear a large majority of it is crap anyway. All the DZ vendors
sold the best stuff in the beta, you get all the purple armor and the
"exotic" guns and your nigh unstoppable.
Is there going to be any other pvp activities?! Or just dumb running around
for bot actions and killing others this way or killing rouges? If yes, I'll
be done with game in a week. It'll just be plain boring...
+Nikita Poliakov Exactly what it will be.It's going to be like a firework , it will burn brightly for a very short time and after that it will be gone .Just another overhyped game.
Why are people pissed at these guys for their tactics? This is how the
darkzone works, what makes it intense and fun. If those guys they killed
really cared about the loot they were extracting they would have been extra
careful, like trying to find out player intention as soon as possiple, or
sit in a spot where they cant be ambushed.
Its that thing where you dont know if a player truly is helping you, or
waiting for the right moment. Sometimes people start a fight on sight, but
most of the time players wait for the right moment to strike. And thats
what it makes it so intense and uneasy. Thats the point of the darkzone, if
you dont like that, stay away from the darkzone.
The Division IGN AMA - Dark Zone Objectives, Takedowns & More
This video takes a look at some of the questions IGN asked developers in their recent AMA. Don't forget to ▻ Like ▻ Comment ▻ Subscribe for daily gaming ...
Conclusion:
-There wont objectives in the DZ, only ever respawning high level mobs
- No melee weapons
- It will be just like Destiny where most of the high level "content" will
be about repeating mission at higher difficulty's.
Question: will Massive answer anything meaningful?
Answer: no, they're going to completely dodge every remotely difficult
question and only answer toss ups that barely even qualify as softballs.
And even most of those answers are just non-answers.
+Cem Gunduz Just as an add, the vender was reported to be in your base of operations, possibly the same vender you get your bonus items for preorder stuff.
+JOJOCOLA HD yea you can earn the poe currency. In the full game, there will be an exchange kiosk where you can buy DZ currency with the currency on PVE zone. then you can just enter a checkpoint and interact with the DZ vendor and buy DZ weapons. DZ is entirely optional although this method is extremely tedious.
Did anyone else who played the beta shoot the dogs for fun or shoot the
cleaners exclusively in their flamethrower packs to watch them blow up, or
am i just some psychopath
+Ckay oww I'm sorry, I figured he meant that when you damage another non hostile player while in a team, that you're whole team becomes rogue. That happened to me while teaming up with a random. I'm sorry for misunderstading guys
+Joni A No you can't. You have to leave your squad to do any damage to them. If you accidentally shoot another random player, if you do under 1 bar of damage then you don't go rogue incase it was miss fire.
+InItForTheParking I will still disagree, they're not the same thing. The word is indeed tainted, but it's better to categorize the different aspects of either DLC or Micro-transactions. The reason I brought up P2W is because that would impact the game negatively, where as cosmetics don't do any harm.I accept cosmetic in-game purchases, because this helps the developer release free updates of the game frequently. It's a good business model that many successful games use.And no, I never buy any of these, except for larger expansions. But I also don't mind them as long as they don't affect the game. I have no reason to care, the game doesn't feel stripped down.
+Cynt3r No, a micro transaction is just that. A small exchange of money for something. Whether they are trying to hide the actual price by making you buy a currency then the 99 cent to 5 dollar item is irrelevant.They will have cosmetic microtransations like a number of other games. But rather than have it in their own store they will sell it in small packs through the stores as DLC so they can get away with saying that there are no micros.As I said, they can call it whatever they like but the bottom line is that it is what it is. A small transaction of currency for small product.Why are you bringing P2W into this? No one has said anything about that. I have no problem with them selling content, it is the misrepresentation I have a problem with. And since when does not getting all the content of a game for something you paid full price for not count as a negative effect? I'm all for micros on F2P games. In fact I have supported a few devs through these. But when you sell a full retail game, the people who bought that game should get everything for it. People like you are the reason gamers are getting nickeled and dimed more and more over the past 10-15 years. You just bend over and take it up the ass with a smile on your face.
+InItForTheParking The word 'microtransactions' was brought in for a reason, else they'd still be calling it DLC. It is downloadable content, yes, but I believe microtransactions would rather be referred to as in game content that you can keep buying. Credits, for instance. There's no limit to how many credits you'd be able to purchase.Then there's pay to win content, to give you an upper hand by using real life money. They're not including that either. Having them sell cosmetics to gain money and provide us with free updates and content is nothing that affects you negatively. It's up to you whether you choose to buy cosmetics or not.
+Cynt3r Sure it is. If I call the planets moons because they orbit the sun it doesn't make it so. If I call a truck a car because it has 4 wheels it doesn't make it so. Just because they call microtransactions DLC doesn't make it so.
IGN Reviews - Harry Potter: Deathly Hallows Part 2 Game Review
IGN gives its video review of the new Harry Potter: Deathly Hallows Part 2 game. Is Harry's final adventure worth of Gryffindor's legacy? Find out. IGN's YouTube ...
Havent played the first game but by the looks if it...2 just seems like a
much better game and you dont need the frist game.3rd was one of my
favourite HP games.BUT i really dont know why the hell were ppl so pissed
about HP 4?They tried something else and it worked really good i liked the
game a lot even better than 2 but idk was the exploring if hogwarts that
fun?In all of those games hogwarts is just a big school with some
secrets(ok!)but with a small outside area in 1 & 2 i really dont know whats
the big deal?TGOF was brilliant IMO if someone could explain why it sucked
then please do
Sorry my little brother posted that LOL.In the meanwhile Ive also started playing Harry Potter and I see ur point.My younger brother also only talked about the pc versions and I am planning to get the ps2 versions since they look amazing.As for the PC the 1. game was very boring to me the 2. is much better and less boring(thankfully) but the 3. is the best of the 1. three.The fourth when comparing to the PC versions is not so bad but idk about the console when compared to them.The 5th I havent played myself but I heard that the game is very boring.The 6th is just fucking dull and boring the quiditch is awful the dueling is super easy and the potion making isnt all that engaging.The 7th game I liked much better,and the shooting could be fun at times and the game is interesting idk why.The 8th I dont like as much as 7th.Both of those games arent good and can be broken at times cuz of unpolishnes but they can be fun which I preffer over the dull 6th game.This is only my opinion keep that in mind and I will reply when I play Order of the Phoenix and share my opinion about it too
+John Edin Well, even in my point of view (and trust me, I'm a huge Harry Potter fan) the game was terrible. The gameplay controls were weird, the game was really short, the cutscenes sucked and the voice acting was terrible. Also exploring Hogwarts was a HUGE part in the games because you were given freedom to explore a castle like school full of secrets. You get to do that in game 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6. In the fourth game the only freedom you're given is basically the selection of different levels. Yup, levels. Unlike ALL the other Harry Potter games, the fourth one was completely ruined because it's short, gameplay sucks, doesn't provide you with as much freedom as the other games and it's on levels. For me the fourth game will always be the worst Harry Potter game.
+Jean Bellai I know it's late, but I gotta say this. I disagree with both of you. It is true that the first three games were awesome. But that doesn't mean the rest sucked. The fourth one sucked, but 5 and 6 were ok. I'm a huge Harry Potter fan myself. I don't know if I agree with this review as I haven't played the two Deathly Hallows games yet, but I will soon, so I'll let you know when I get my opinion on that.
+Sam Vadasy Never read the books so can't comment there. As for the games and movies it pretty much died after the third one. David Yetes destroyed the potter films 5-8, maybe because J.K. wasn't involved. It could've had so much potential. Oh and don't even get me started on the war =(
make a harry potter RPG where we get to be a student at hogwarts, that
could be awesome! one where we can customize a character and get sorted in
a house. that would be that bedst game ever!...if they make it right...
+Kristian Madsen yeah, I think the HP World would be perfect for a mmorpg, I sure as hell would be thrilled! Games that follow the movies are good, but in the end most fans would know the story by heart already and theer isn't any freedom to change parts of the story or relationships of the characters that could make the whole thing more diverse. All thats left is to find a way to rewind the movie in a way thats halfway interactive and engaging... Not a very easy task (as the game developers have proven) I'm not satisfied with endless shooting at enemies, that's not what Harry Potter is about in the first place.
Why Call of Duty 2016 Won't Be Ghosts 2 - Unlocked 229
Infinity Ward's been staffing up, so our Xbox show discusses where they might take Call of Duty this year. ---------------------------------- Follow IGN for more!
+ELITE082 Black ops 2 was a good game and Black ops 3 is very playable compared to AW. But I did like Ghosts even though compared to the good old days of Cod 4, W@W and MW2 it was a poor display. Kids these days don't know.
+vito fiore That may be. Respawn isn't owned by EA. But EA did publish Titanfall and I assume they'll publish Titanfall 2 as well. So it seems possible to me that EA would let them make a Star Wars game and publish it if they wanted.
+vito fiore Visceral is making an open world Star Wars, but more than one company can make a Star Wars game at a time. 3rd person action adventure could be some sort of Jedi game. A new Jedi Knight game or Force Unleashed would be cool.
+Tigero Rousteinire i think it will be to because, the modern warfare series ended. and ghosts ended on a cliff hanger. soooooooooo, you can disagree. but really mw4?????? no. it can't really. unless they have price go insane and kills every one who had any relation to killing soap and his crew. but I'm kinda done with the future stuff but, thats just my opinion.
@adolfigo wow how much of a phag are u like rely u know its sad when some
one has to say homo as their best disse and no im not gay. But apparently u
are why do u keep talking about dark towers unless u have no balls like
horse dick.mpg and if u dont know were thats from ur more of a loser than i
thought. Im going to be the mature one here because i actually have a life.
Im not replaying to u again why because i actually have a life and im not
going to waste it with a phag who has an over ego.
@jim1621 dude you start this, SO you stay dumbass...., you DON'T have a
life asshole, you are the archetypal lonely old man who reply online
comments, its lame, its very sad...., jess chobot can defend by herself
sissy boy, that is for sure chump, she don't need a bold, virgin, fat
bastard like you pops... and i know you wanna meet my dark tower cause you
just don't wanna let it go...
When you're natural and happy like in this one, you rock skies. But when
you have to do daily fix as a job and still smile doesnt look that good
(but doesnt suck xD). You're awesome girl and host too :) Google instant
sucks, dont see the point in some stuff they do. Jess Chobot
@JDT710 yes it's better. uc2 and mgs 4 are very derivative and cliched. and
fps are better than other genres as well. uc2 and mgs4 only got tens
because theyre ps3 exclusive. had they been xbox exclusive they would have
been rated much lower.
@Stockpile1 I'm not biased. I own both systems. The media is very biased
though, Uncharted and MGS4 get a ten, but there's no way Halo gets a ten.
And IGN only gave it a 9.5 just like I predicted.
She certanly seems happy...unless it's sarcasm of sorts. My guess is that
it's later. The only anoying thing about Jess is that she is not doing any
video reviews of videogames.
if that girl was relatively unattractive she would have had 0% chance of
getting that job. sad world isnt it? but then again, I dont want to watch
an ugly girl talk
i always found dark tower got boring after like the 3rd book ... (after the
train book)
Comics of the Week 06.18.12 - IGN The Comics Run
Comics Editor Joey Esposito breaks down the week's hottest comic book releases, from Avengers fighting X-Men to Darth Vader being a badass. Head over to ...
Personally I think that American comics are quiet less popular manga one
reason is that the comic is more an American thing. Like here in Sweden we
only had spiderman in a little while ago, it took away (yes now it has come
back but it is still not popular as other series like donald duck) must
apologize for my bad English
I don't care much for the Manga Vs American comics debate. Why can't you
pick and choose the titles for each that you want to read? I mostly enjoy
American style comics, but pick up the occasional manga comic that interest
me... Oh, and I'm asian if that makes my point more valid...
Yeah, not from the US Bub. And no, Manga isn't better. They're the same
personalities for each character, they all act the same and make stupid
silly faces. Same goes for anime. You see how stupid your manga is? PS:
Comics are* much older than manga/anime themselves.
i'm assuming you meant 'does' . and yes manga has a pretty big fan base..to
be honest i stopped reading comic books when i was like 10, but alot of my
friends and I to this day still read manga..sooo theres that
I'm not a comic/manga/whatever reader at all but seeing the comments I get
the impression you all need to shut the fuck up and enjoy what you like to
read, why are people arguing about manga and America?
i suppose an Asian being interested in comics is also an american "wannabe"
right?..you see how stupid your comment is? PS: comics is much older than
the debt ridden US itself
While manga may be better, by the time translations are commercially
released, diehard fans have already read the fan translations on the net.
Personally, I'm a fan of both.
these people are clearly idiots (which is why their arguments show such
ignorance) when you remember that, the arguing on most of these videos make
so much sense
I'd love to read the before watchmen series but I don't want to buy a bunch
of paperback issues. I'll wait for a collected edition in like a million
years. :(