Funny cryptic riddles Videos

+Cat with a C, not a K The shadow at 0:17 :3

+Joshua Azarcon said:"There is technology today that CAN record the content of dreams, even if partially"I repeat myself:"There is no technology that can examine a corpse and determine what the person was dreaming of before they died.The story is IMPOSSIBLE!"Nowhere in the video does it say or imply that the man was strapped to an EEG, or MRI.

+Sockpuppet2012There is technology today that CAN record the content of dreams, even if partially.There is currently research being done with Electroencephalography (EEG) readings being worked with Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) that CAN record the dreams and thought processes of a human brain as they occur. This is done by having the devices record the brain patterns and decoding it by relating it to objects that the brain patterns would usually correlate to (For instance, the brain releases specific patterns of waves when it thinks of an apple. If an apple is thought of in a dream, the same brain waves can be translated to let the observer know that an apple was in a dream).Through this decoding process, the man's nightmare in the story is possible to be observed by the brother who was right next to him by decoding the cupboard and the "crazy man from the movie". His increased heart rate can provide even more observation to the brother by indicating that his dream is a nightmare where his adrenaline increases and can give him way to interpret the nightmare with the man hiding in the cupboard from the crazy man.  Note: THIS PROCESS AS OF NOW CANNOT BE DONE ON A DECADENT BRAIN TO DETECT BRAIN WAVES OF THE PAST.Other note: THAT WASN'T MY ARGUMENT.That would be "stupid and impossible", which is probably why you tried to misrepresent my argument.Your argument is that the dream would need to be recorded after the man's death. Because dreams cannot be observed on a decadent brain due to being unable to detect past brain waves, this story is impossible.My argument is that the brother was recording the man's dreams as they were happening. The readings were able to detect and decode the brain waves DURING his dream as the brother observed them. Because the readings have a high accuracy in decoding brain waves and because the brother could have observed the dream WHILE the man was ALIVE, this story is POSSIBLE.//emedicine.medscape.com/article/1139332-overview//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroencephalography//www.newscientist.com/article/dn16267-mindreading-software-could-record-your-dreams.html#.VM0Q-vldXnU//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_magnetic_resonance_imaging//fmri.ucsd.edu/Research/whatisfmri.htmlThis story IS POSSIBLE if the brother was recording the man's nightmares with the readings that decode brain waves to common existences during his death, not after it....Seriously though, your comment was rather brash.Your argument basically is:Premise 1: There is no technology that exists to record dreamsAnd you provide no substantial evidence or support with it. It's just an empty claim for the nonexistence of something that exists.Premise 2: No technology can read the thoughts of a dead brain.You misconstrue my argument. I never said in my original comment that the technology would record the man's dreams after their end or after his death. All I said is "Yes, this can be true. We have technology today that can actually observe and record dreams." This technology was implied in my comment to be put to use while the man was living of course since I said it can observe and record dreams in Present Tense, not Past Tense like "dreamt dreams" or "after death" silly.Conclusion: Therefore this story is impossible.Your empty nonexistence premise and your misconstruing premise lack impact for your final mighty claim.  And last but not least, your arrogant oh so mighty ad hominem made to hurt people's feelings to make it look like you're oh so smart and superior than me by dressing yourself as an authoritative figure for society... which was probably made by you for kicks so that you can feel oh so good about yourself (The dopamine feels good, doesn't it? Not to mention, I also see that you +1 your own comment... Ha! Pathetic narcissism I tell you!)... All of which being completely unnecessary.I shall return the favor with what I consider a much truer statement.You're close-minded, and a perfect example of the SOCK PUPPETS of society that truly dumb it down by not opening itself to possibilities, immediately labeling anything that hasn't yet been observed as impossible!

There is no technology that can detect the CONTENT of dreams.There is no technology that can examine a corpse and determine what the person was dreaming of before they died.The story is IMPOSSIBLE!You're delusional, and a perfect example of the dumbing-down of society!

I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE

That was "Little miss Muffet" who "sat on her tuffet".....".....and along came a spider....."

Checked the answer -.- wow just.....

I know! Exactly! It is pretty dumb. So the real answer would be yes, it did happen.

not if its a real story~~

+SickRedApple Also, Spoiler Alert!

+ASTCify The question was 'Did this really happen'. In real life, no one is omniscient. In order for us to have known that this actually happened, the man needed to have told someone what the dream was about.

This would have been a better answer to the riddle than the official one. The riddle never specified that the sleeping person communicated his dream to anyone. The narrator is an omniscient third party, so the official doesn't make sense at all.

i mean without any cuts *

Yah dead body vid tomorrow

idk but look it up there are vids about it i saw it on Domislive

location on the map?

+XtremeEnigma14 Neither did I at first :P

+CODX360 Oh sorry didn't see that

I believe there is a h in 'this'

+Rognvaldi You're right, bananas are pretty damn hard to find and at the 2nd one is really easy but managed to trick you here.