Home » Video » ...

Steve israel chicken Videos

Newsday endorses Steve Israel in the 3rd Congressional District

Steve Bailey & Victor Wooten - A Chick From Corea (Live) (Tremendo Tema.)

User Comments

LessIsMorphine commented on 08 Nov 2015

I didn't bother listening to the music because the sex appeal is too great to not have my undivided attention. From Victors sexstache to Steve's cock saying, "well how do you do?!?" to the highest of fashion, this video should come with a Google map location to give you directions straight to Pussyville

STOVE commented on 09 Nov 2015

+LessIsMorphine perfect

Cyborg Rabbit commented on 04 Jun 2015

Hey anyone know where this song originates from? Any specific composer / band?

James Brown commented on 01 Dec 2015

+Cyborg Rabbit CHICK COREA JAZZ MUSICIAN AN HOMAGE OF SORTS

Cesare Polonara commented on 19 May 2015

Bailey's right hand technique shows very well how right hand technique on electric bass is something very personal that any player should dig deeply before understanding what's the best that fits better his own anatomy and musical taste...

Rick Rock commented on 20 Jul 2015

+Rick K Actually, on closer inspection, maybe he does pluck kinda funnily... extremely flat angle on the right fingers due to the 6 strings and always anchoring the thumb at the top.

Rick Rock commented on 17 Jul 2015

+Cesare Polonara I don't see anything particular about his technique, it's just that he's plucking 2+ strings simultaneously a lot of the time. In other music, he probably plays regular fingerstyle like anyone else.

Hyena commented on 20 May 2015

+Cesare Polonara his technique comes from playing the double bass, I think.

TheMetatron333 commented on 16 May 2015

Victor catches the spirit at 1:30

manuel chaux commented on 13 Jan 2016

jajaja siii, Víctor toca con mucha pasión.

Lauritz Wiesinger commented on 11 Jan 2015

does anyone know when that was?

Peter Schmitz commented on 14 Apr 2015

+Lauritz Wiesinger Should be '93 :)

jay eff commented on 04 Jul 2014

Was that Yakety Sax towards the end there?

Fernando Agustin Rodriguez commented on 19 Oct 2014

Yep! By the way, Victor was playing bass with piccolo strings.

Andrew Christian commented on 21 Mar 2014

Victor Wooten + Steve Bailey = Victor Bailey?

Funkmentality commented on 22 Dec 2014

no.

Cameron VS Miliband - Who's The Chicken? Russell Brand The Trews (E240)

Russell Brand The Trews (E240). In this episode I discuss what role political debates really have in our modern democracy and how the entertainment factor ...

User Comments

Jumblebeast2 commented on 29 Apr 2015

Russel brand you are a fucking idiot u should be shot. David Cameron is a wanker and labour should win and you've made ed look stupid. Katy perry should of never married you I'm clad she divorced you.

Ned Chil commented on 05 May 2015

+Jumblebeast2 Yeh! I bet it was great fun being married to a lady as innovative & intelligent as Katy Perrzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Jekaterina Salakicka commented on 21 Apr 2015

In my opinion politicians in the parliament are so detached from the reality, because the job in the parliament IS their reality... They talk about things, which matter to them, like bakers would talk about prices on icing and truck drivers about traffic... There has never been a connection between the government and the people, plus the elected ones always betray their electorate, like Nick Clegg accepted the rise of the tuition fees from £3000 to £9000, when before he promised to keep them as they were!!! Should he go to jail for fraud??? I think he should...

Jim The Chair commented on 23 Apr 2015

Remember that Lib-dems were not ruling on their own, conservatives only allowed them to work together to win. It's very hard with two governments with conflicting ideas to change stuff.

Ben McCarthy commented on 08 Feb 2015

russell, create your own political party, you will have enough support, then there will be a party to vote for.

Niklez7 commented on 09 Feb 2015

he would fit right into the tea party in Brussels.

dogsanthem commented on 29 Jan 2015

To say the things they will be discussing wont have any real impact is nonsense. The coalitions bedroom tax legislation, for example, has had a massive negative impact on thousands of people across the country. I know you want radical change, allot of people do, but the small details matter!! The difference between having your spare bedroom taxed or not, or having the minimum wage raised to a living wage or not, does not effect you, and therefore it is easy for you to sit there and demand a radical alternative whilst ignoring the small details. Even Noam Chomsky, a real anarchist, understands that the deference between voting republican or democrat, labour or conservative DOES have a significant effect and impact on peoples lives.

dogsanthem commented on 29 Jan 2015

Plus, MP's do more than just go to PMQ's. You love to pick one debate and make out that is the norm. You wont chose to analyse an ordinary debate because you see it as mundane and boring. Well sometimes getting stuff done is boring, politics does not exist for your entertainment.

Guy Pearson commented on 27 Jan 2015

Wait. Did Russell say the x factor is well made TV? Over and over again, it's people who have had such a "hard time", its just to appeal to the audience's emotions. How come every good looking singer in Britain has "been through so much" Then next year there's another. I thought it was a dining contest not a drama - singing - drama sandwich. I'm sure everyone knows its all fixed. They say it every year... Load of shite.

Guy Pearson commented on 27 Jan 2015

Singing contest*

Nathan Lunde-Berry commented on 25 Jan 2015

A happy byproduct (for the wealthy) of these televised debates is the focus of this entire trews. People not voting is exactly what they all want no kidding. Your government is the only thing standing between you and some kind of dystopian libertarian lawless (for the wealthy) hell hole. Who helps get your needs across? Your local representatives that's why you vote for them. You don't really vote for people this high up (unless you're american). They are appointed by the people you voted for so vote better if you have a problem.

ruddas81 commented on 28 Jan 2015

You can include the UK electorate too in that....//www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/journalist/electoral-commission-media-centre/news-releases-donations/political-parties-latest-donations-and-borrowing-figures-published3

Nathan Lunde-Berry commented on 28 Jan 2015

+ruddas81 I addressed that. The american electorate consistently vote for politicians with the highest campaign contributions. So, therefore, politicians spend all of their time getting the highest possible campaign contributions.It's bewildering to me that anyone thinks anything other than that is what is happening.

ruddas81 commented on 28 Jan 2015

+Nathan Lunde-Berry The point is though that we are not really living in a democracy when political parties get donations from the most wealthy people in the country. Essentially we are already living in that hell you talked about where the wealthiest class is ruling us. The wealthiest people in the planet have ruled over people for centuries and now an academic defined political and cultural system has been created that basically caters for the wealthiest.

dodgeydoer1234 commented on 27 Jan 2015

Yeah VOTE for change, abstain for the same. Aim for smaller parties if you have to.

Nathan Lunde-Berry commented on 26 Jan 2015

Not voting does nothing, I mean especially if you're not advocating for a better system. Voter turnout in the US general election 2014 was 36.4%. It's not like a better system is going to swoop in. You've got 65%, so if half those people vote you're still going to have a democracy. It's just a worse one.

Stuart Hardy Cull commented on 26 Jan 2015

Yeah I see your point although I still disagree that not voting doesn't achieve anything at all. I'm not not voting out of sheer apathy at least. Give me something worth voting for & I'll vote for it. That was of course a rhetorical question, I have at least a vague idea of how the current system came about, I think I am more interested in it than most of the 35% of eligible voters who did not vote in the last general election for whatever reason. But, I am steadily losing interest. I might just be able to tune in for the results of this year's general election. & if this is what you call democracy then it ain't all it's cracked up to be! I call it a 2nd rate Punch & Judy show.

Nathan Lunde-Berry commented on 26 Jan 2015

"More of the same plz guys" is not voting. Because then you get whatever the people voting want. Along with it all you get is a sense of "it's not my fault this happened" which is worthless. It didn't show up fully formed, it had a lot of revisions, but we don't even have a starting point for something different. You're advocating for something other than democracy?

Stuart Hardy Cull commented on 26 Jan 2015

+Nathan Lunde-Berry You still have faith in the electoral procedure & you are far from alone - 65% of people eligible to vote in Britain turned out in the 2010 general election. That's not a small portion of the population so I respect that you want to vote & that you believe it can make a difference. Me? I see a vote for ANY party as a vote for "more of the same please guys!" As for "Come up with one then." Do you think the current system just sprang forth fully-formed from someone's mind or was it tinkered with & modified over generations to get where it is?

Nathan Lunde-Berry commented on 26 Jan 2015

Come up with one then. Until then we have government and you manage it by voting. If people would start voting for their best interests rather than for whichever candidate has the most campaign contributions, we'd all be in a better spot. Otherwise yea we get a government that neuters itself and serves the wealthy. That's who was voted for.

Stuart Hardy Cull commented on 26 Jan 2015

Politics hasn't always been like this. If there is such a thing as a ruling elite, the hand behind the curtain or whatever you want to call it, it hasn't always had such a vice-like grip on government. If I understand you correctly you're saying that government has been purposefully neutered, & I agree. There is no going back however. Voting or not voting will not save this system, we need to invent something new from the ground up that will simply grow to replace the old method. Like a snake shedding it's skin, it doesn't do so until the new skin is fully formed beneath.

Slavoj Žižek - Maybe We Just Need a Different Chicken ...

Sociologist and philosopher, Slavoj Žižek, discusses politeness and civility in the function of contemporary ideology. Dr. Žižek spoke at Powell's City of Books in ...

User Comments

Tomek Samcik commented on 20 Jan 2015

Zizek, I love your lectures, but please leave your nose alone

frank x commented on 20 Feb 2015

Could be a coke-head.

the Onca commented on 09 Feb 2014

his behaviour is dumb as eff ! providing this level of truth to a civilization being by far not ready for this causes nothing but pain causes nothing but pain

theoutmoreproject commented on 01 Nov 2014

Coward

Nuno Pereira commented on 10 Jan 2014

I'm not able to focus on what he says, just his fucking lisp.

bunberrier commented on 21 May 2014

His mannerisms are a bit off putting at first but I recommend you stick with it. His observations are fascinating.

John Doe commented on 19 Dec 2013

@58:10 Nationalism = Rape Girls, Beat your Wife?! You serious? What a strange idea. Sounds more like anarchy.

ac1dP1nk commented on 10 Oct 2014

+Andreas Ährlund-Richter There have been very few instances of anarchy in human history; usually they were crushed. anarchy is not a synonym of chaos, which is what we have right now. markets pay no heed to hierarchy, it is those with power - in our case the means of exchange - who can take advantage of the opportunities that are presented through the mechanism that dominates the interactions of complex organisms. The world is still in the grip of passive evolution; there is nothing permanent that could be recognised as a construction, only individual stages of transience.

Andreas Ährlund-Richter commented on 09 Oct 2014

+ac1dP1nk Humans dont tend to live in anarchy very long. We are hierarchial in our construction.

ac1dP1nk commented on 26 Mar 2014

yeah because anarchy= chaos and nationalism isn't nonsense. You wrote an ignorant there.