Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?
Home » Video » ...

Audi a4 2010 euro ncap Videos

Euro NCAP | Audi A1| 2010 | Crash test

//www.euroncap.com/results/audi/a1/2010/412.aspx Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier.

User Comments

https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-Au-sqWkWkdY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/j8KL-p9CGfs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheCarArchives commented on 24 Oct 2011
the engine on the 2010-present Audi A1 Engine 1.2 L TFSI 63 kW I4 petrol 1.4 L TFSI 90 kW I4 petrol 1.6 L TDI 77 kW I4 diesel 2.0 L TDI 105 kW I4 diesel
https://i1.ytimg.com/i/NHlP1pZoBaYHBSBUb3nNZw/1.jpg?sz=64
CrazyCabDriver commented on 26 Nov 2010
@Hotknife1989 total agree! the worst is, if you look at it from the back with an open trunk. Total Fiat500!!! But that's only my opinion...
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-Au-sqWkWkdY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/j8KL-p9CGfs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheCarArchives commented on 04 Apr 2012
the transmission on the 2010-present Audi A1 Transmission 5-speed manual 6-speed manual 7-speed S tronic 1-speed (A1 e-tron)
https://i1.ytimg.com/i/Kv3l1ELH4VjWGwJDsG34oA/1.jpg?sz=64
Hotknife1989 commented on 25 Nov 2010
I still cannot believe that Audi made a car that has the same shape as a Fiat 500...
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-aGth5wYWXu8/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAABM/LZAtqAviWlw/photo.jpg?sz=64
Jack Harrison commented on 27 Dec 2015
Wassup1 Interesting Video invention tip What's your opinion about tmat 1!
https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-E0xknrzI2wM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/7ui8QVaOPYk/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Kevin Moondust commented on 23 Jun 2012
Do your research; the spiritual predecessor to this car was the Audi 50.
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-OZ_IdE50118/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/bCeVUuA5zCM/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
awakehornet commented on 25 Nov 2010
Nice result, for a very nice car!! Thanks for testing this one =)
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-Au-sqWkWkdY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/j8KL-p9CGfs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheCarArchives commented on 04 Sep 2011
the 2010-present Audi A1 is assembled in Brussels, Belgium
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-ZiKBlvLH5BQ/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/cSU39Suxw_Q/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
JN DNT commented on 24 Nov 2010
OMG!! That's great!!

1990 Audi 100 EuroNCAP Side Pole Impact

A crash test at only 32 Km/h. HIC-10714 TTI-135 Max Pelvic G's-74.

User Comments

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-4E9om5CVZOw/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAk/-xN2padxTlg/photo.jpg?sz=64
whattheheck1000 commented on 14 Dec 2015
It's not the Audi. Any car without side curtain airbags would fail this test. I think there was a heavy duty early 2010s Chevy truck that also had fatal HICs (around 7000 I think) because it had no curtain airbags. Side structures are much stronger now than they were in 1990 as well. There is not a 1990 car in the world where this test would be survivable, assuming the head and pole lined up. The '95 Corolla they also tested had a very low HIC only because the head missed the pole. A couple inches forward and the HIC would have been fatal on that one as well. December 14, 2015 2:24 am
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-GF40uBLvkzk/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/59qtusYoIPQ/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
swordfish1986 commented on 20 Oct 2010
@carlevent Ich weiß nicht, ob der Audi normalerweise noch Querstreben im Dach hat, da nur das reine Blechdach sicher nichts am Ergebnis geändert hätte. Ich könnte mir auch nicht vorstellen, warum man das Auto für den Crash struktural schwächen sollte, denn damit würde das Ergebnis aussagelos werden. So oder so denke ich aber nicht, dass es sehr viel an diesem Ergebnis geändert hätte. Man muss bedenken, dass es sich um eine Konstruktion der frühen 1980er Jahre handelt.
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-vqUIWDmKWZc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/sBy1-c-pLeQ/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Linus Magnus commented on 12 Feb 2012
@vwolop Golf and for collided frontally. Ford had minor damage but Golf was beaten up. This isnt only case, new cars are safer but they arent made to survive crash. Ask any mechanic or just look yourself under the hood. New cars are built to absorb impact, not to survive it. Old cars have stronger structure so when they collide, new cars are destroyed. Older cars have much stronger bodywork and structure but driver is safer in new car!
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-fZRA9IkoKfw/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/92J30lXKZoU/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
WAUZZZ81ZDA commented on 07 Mar 2013
What a silly notion. This is car has an integral body, every piece of it adds to the rigidity. Without the roof the energy cant be transferred to the b-billar on the other side. The same goes for the Windscreen - its part of the structure. Also i wouldnt be surprised if the makers of that movie removed the strenghening beam thats bolted to the underfloor across the car...
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-nquLuhjTrd8/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/h--7m5cZzVs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
bommmmmmmm commented on 16 Nov 2011
The ridged pole test – the hardest of them all. So much kinetic energy that needs to be absorbed and that’s all concentrated over a small area right where your sitting - where you can least afford intrusion. Probably the only time you are at a possible disadvantage being in a longer car.
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-87C8vHoL-ls/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/1fFaAcHKLWQ/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
SteelCity1981 commented on 16 Sep 2011
@ignasquattro So they can see the effects of the crash from a birsds eye view it's not like the roof was apart of the side structure. it's the pillars in the roof that are and clrearly this did have any, because the 95 corralla they did the same thing and left the upper pillars intact.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-rKM-1851smU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACg/03yTPOdCO20/photo.jpg?sz=64
Mariah99 commented on 07 Dec 2015
Wow things have changed and to anyone hating on this car it was the 90's when people had better things to do with there lives than worry about an idiotic driver skidding at 20miles per hour (sideways) which means they would have had to be doing well over 100 to get a 20 sideways ..
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-J5REUO_qH2g/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/gSZcVIlZwmU/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
japtraplex commented on 01 Apr 2011
They didn't cut the roof off you idiots. They simply cut away the sheet steel that covers the roof, leaving the structure of the roof in place. This way we can see the structure of the roof interact with the pillar and see the way it collapses in a collision.
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-B7HGlGZ80pI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/XVVKqx3UioE/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
granadaassi commented on 11 Jul 2012
dasdach bzw der dachhimmel ist im typ 44 verklebt und mittragend-mit dach wäre der aufprall weit weniger dramatisch gewesen! ein auto zu zersägen und dann zu behaupten es wäre unsicher ist schlichter betrug!
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/--FngVTvMk2c/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/XXzmVT-qZEE/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
GSi16vrs commented on 19 Mar 2011
@ignasquattro Between the B pillars where the pole hit hardest is usual a reinforcement but they have cut it of as well. In this example they could cut the roof and make it a cab, it would be the same result
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-XPhobJyCte4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/Savy9OWw2-s/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
cargogh commented on 11 Feb 2013
I used to have one just like that, same color, but with grey fabric interior. Great car. Tracked as well as any I've ever owned. Very good grip, quiet. Screaming hot seat heaters.
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-87C8vHoL-ls/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/1fFaAcHKLWQ/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
SteelCity1981 commented on 16 Sep 2011
@vwolop It's actually the cell compartment itself that channels the energy not the sheet metal. the sheet metal is not apart of any safety feature it's just panel molding.
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-Au-sqWkWkdY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/j8KL-p9CGfs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheCarArchives commented on 06 Mar 2012
the engine on the 1982-1991 Audi 100/ Hongqi Mingshi Engine 1.8L I4 1.9L I5 2.0L I5 2.1L I5 2.2L I5 2.3L I5 2.0L I5 Diesel 2.0L I5 Turbodiesel 2.4L I5 Diesel 2.5L I5 TDI
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-Au-sqWkWkdY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/j8KL-p9CGfs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheCarArchives commented on 26 Oct 2011
the engine on the 1982-1991 Audi 100 Engine 1.8L I4 1.9L I5 2.0L I5 2.1L I5 2.2L I5 2.3L I5 2.0L I5 Diesel 2.0L I5 Turbodiesel 2.4L I5 Diesel 2.5L I5 TDI
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-vqUIWDmKWZc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/sBy1-c-pLeQ/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Linus Magnus commented on 11 Feb 2012
@vwolop I saw traffic accident, old ford from 70s - oldtimer and new ww golf 5, golf was totally destroyed, old for had literally just few scratches!
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-OT9Uz8xOqkM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/b2_dS6-aLAE/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
LPFan3118 commented on 11 Nov 2011
@heigo1994 are you talking about this video?Yes I know on this video it's a C3 but I really want to see a frontal crash test with an Audi C3.
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-Au-sqWkWkdY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/j8KL-p9CGfs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheCarArchives commented on 06 Mar 2012
the 1982-1991 Audi 100/ Hongqi Mingshi was assembled in Neckarsulm, Germany Changchun, China Uitenhage, South Africa Tokyo, Japan
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-x54k4GSsjF0/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/k0J6MQlRiyc/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
PriusRider commented on 01 Jul 2012
a problen u can see on all "old" cars that has been build before 1995. The passenger compartmentcell is way to weak build.
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-Au-sqWkWkdY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/j8KL-p9CGfs/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
TheCarArchives commented on 15 Jul 2011
the 1982-1991 Audi 100 was assembled in Neckarsulm, Germany Changchun, China Uitenhage, South Africa Tokyo, Japan
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-wWXfK11tIxU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/XJzdOdJm4gA/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
compu85 commented on 01 Oct 2011
@SteelCity1981 Right, there are multiple cross beams built into the roof, and a large one between the B pillars.
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-8kQ1pSd6MdM/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/7z1fiOnKzRg/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
eurekaseven4me commented on 04 Dec 2010
they cut the friggin roof off....these cars are unibodies...obviously european crash testers are morons
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-mZVCn8IeC9o/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/JTMiicYSKfE/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
carlevent commented on 17 Sep 2010
Den Test kann man nicht verallgemeinern, da der Audi ohne Dach gecrasht wird und dadurch instabil ist.
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-Mhyl-EL-EAo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/uAeYWopyniI/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
FindCarAccidentLawyer commented on 11 Oct 2013
This seems to be a dreadfully slow speed that still seemed to cause long term trauma on the driver.
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-anigVoGDTRE/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/6sCVwm1K-Xk/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
BoeingvsAirbus1578 commented on 17 Apr 2013
They did that for the Ford Taurus test, I think it's just to test the srength of the doors, maybe?
https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-IyfyyiMD6rw/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/J6VJngcKvz0/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
aloisbembel commented on 28 Nov 2011
@ignasquattro They wanted to check the physical maximum of possible damage. For whatever reason.
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-lHc1QLOpIic/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/bWBpnnx7q0E/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Gigabomber commented on 07 Jun 2012
This really makes no sense. What is this testing? if you powerslide off the road into a pole?
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-7IV6kEUq7qI/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/ZgwO7KSloPY/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
mHalfLife commented on 09 Oct 2011
the roof has less than 1% resistance, its negligible, like air resistance at low speeds

Euro NCAP Crash Test of Renault Megane 2015

Euro NCAP frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the Full Width test, 100% of the width of the car the ...

User Comments

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Hayashi Takaya commented on 07 Dec 2015
it looks good but as we see at the very first test results its far far behind astra and golf. Sorry renault! Maybe next time!:)
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-k0969zrejqE/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAH0/fOivNX2ZcBU/photo.jpg?sz=64
stephen10 commented on 10 Feb 2016
+Hayashi Takaya stupid

2003 Audi A4 - Columbus OH

The Sharpest Rides 2002 Audi A4 Stock S4804

Sign up for free to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment