Nazi germany military spending Videos

+RayDee93 Yes, it has passed that point. Everyone now awaits the collapse.

+Koon Troll Oh a troll. Congratz on accepting your failure in life.

+Koon Troll Fuck America

+Smiling Aussie (Doug) I admire your knowledge but it's so esoteric it's not a good match for the "common folk"

Please look into what your in fact pushing ideologically.Challenge it, don't just believe the chatter and regurgitated "group think" of the likes of Alex Jones and other Koch Brothers propaganda outlets.Austrian economics (or the Austrian school of economics) is a school of economic thought that eschews mathematical modeling and empirical testing in favor of a narrative approach termed "praxeology."[2][3]As the claims of Austrian economists are difficult to verify through empirical testing (and the same economists openly admit to it), it is generally considered to be a heterodox approach[4] or outright pseudoscience. Austrian arguments as to why statistical methods cannot adequately describe human behavior can seem intuitively compelling, but they fail to provide the mathematical proof demonstrating why normally unbiased estimates suddenly become biased simply because they are dealing with people who make decisions. In this sense, the Austrian school is to economics as a certain other Austrian school was to psychology. Perhaps one reason they are so uncomfortable with empiricism is that Austrian economists are more interested in defending the political ideology of libertarianism than they are in advancing economic understanding,[5] and rigorous testing can sometimes undermine deeply held political beliefs.Can we take anything positive from it? Well, to start, its use can be found in no economy in the world... except Somalia.[6]Please read on. :-D//rationalwiki.org/wiki/Austrian_school

+RebelRadiusWell that's called a  non-sequitur argument RR.Posting a quote by Lysander Spooner on his anti-social philosophy and hatred of democracy only proves my suspicion that you've been conned by the Koch Brothers "libertarian/Tea Party" rhetoric. When taken in the face of this discussion.Sorry RR, but you're really trying too hard to push that lawless ultra-capitalist rhetoric that has been sold to the kids under the name "libertarian-ism".I know it all to well and it is as Utopian and naive as Communism and Anarchism.Sorry to burst your bubble.Oh and if you feel like break laws and driving through red lights try to to kill anyone.Thanks :-DP.S.I've only had my morning coffee so I'm still half asleep. Sorry if I'm a bit direct. It's my old military training coming through.P.P.SIf you don't want your monopoly money and it has no value send it too me and I'll send you a handful of magic beans. XD

+Smiling Aussie"The principle that the majority have a right to rule the minority, practically resolves all government into a mere contest between two bodies of men, as to which of them shall be masters, and which of them slaves; a contest, that—however bloody—can, in the nature of things, never be finally closed, so long as man refuses to be a slave." - Lysander Spooner

+RebelRadius I've read all that sort of thing before. It doesn't actually mean anything.For example if "Fiat currency is nothing more than monopoly money" as you say then give it all away.give away all that worthless monopoly money to the poor or the homeless or to me. I'll atke if your hands.Now for your false premise that "[...] laws are bits of paper based on opinions backed by guns."Who's "opinion" are they based on RR?Would you accept that many laws are in fact there not to make you a criminal but to also keep you alive?For example do you know why we have road laws?So that the majority of us all use the roads the same way and in that way we all understand how to avoid accidents.Sure there are still accidents, that is for the majority of the time drive fault or due to conditions such as weather.To be frank I read that stuff you've regurgitated before. It's the same old tired anarco-crapitalist rhetoric that the Koch Brothers have been selling the kids as "Libertarian-ism".Thanks for the reply but I might not be the person you'd want to try and spin that one too.Cheers.

+Smiling AussieFiat currency is nothing more than monopoly money.  Bits of paper.  Much like laws are bits of paper based on opinions backed by guns.

+RebelRadius What does that mean? Are you claiming that money is a Socialist ideal?Read the title mate, it's "How Does America Make Money Off War? Financial Interests, Military-Industrial Complex"

+IceManLikeGervin I started paying attention to the money game that happens between corporations and politics during a brief "encounter" with Bechtel Corp. Bechtel has a cozy relationship with Washington D.C. receiving many government contracts over many years. They made lots of money from one such contract to cap the machinery (for lack of the correct word that escapes me) where oil was spewing out in Kuwait, after the Bush Sr. Middle Eastern invasion....also they were to be involved in the Yucca Flats project which I don't think ever happened...I hope. This is, of course, only one of so many corporations involved in this money making machinery. Does anyone out there know of any other corporations like Bechtel.

+1Fireskull NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg lied in claiming that "We are not in a Cold War situation". Every indication contradicts that. We are in The Second Cold War after the invasion by Russia into Ukraine in 2014 and its current occupation of 3 Ukraine territories. We see huge sanctions against Russia. We hear often about NATO and Russia high levels of military alertness and maneuvers. We hear the rhetoric of hostility, such as reminders of the nuclear capabilities. There are other evidences of a Second Cold War.

Go do it then.

+Anderson Dias-Moreira Answer: They haven't. We are no safer - actually far less safe than we were before sept. 11th, 2001 - because now we are being victimized by our OWN government; terrorized b y the police searching homes in Boston after the bombing there - which was clearly known to be going to happen by multiple agencies (the Russians themselves named them to us specifically), groped and fondled in our airports - our children, our wives - daughters - and ourselves - forced to follow curfews (as in Boston) subject to detainment, search without warrant or cause, even assassination, if ordered by our President if we happen to be overseas. It goes on and on. These agencies have NOT "kept us safe:" name one domestic operation other than the duping of some idiots encouraged by these agencies into planning some ridiculous operation. The people who were maimed and killed in Boston would beg to disagree with how "safe" we are now, when there were agents of all of these agencies present. It is a HUGE, trillion-dollar boondoggle - a bag of money for black ops that no one knows about, and that have no oversight, and for private contractors who cannot be overseen by Congress. Our money is being spent to condition us to be afraid of everything, and to enslave us. People had better stop listening to propaganda and start thinking for themselves. That, in essence, is Snowden's message. So far, everything he has said is true, and has hurt no one, and we are no more safe or unsafe for knowing the truth. We are being abused, conditioned, lied to, robbed and made more willing each day to give up the rights secured for us by our Founders. We are fools, and will deserve whatever fate befalls us and our families if we let fear of harm lead us to give up these liberties and allow tyranny to replace them.

+Anderson Dias-MoreiraIt doesnt take billions of dollars to keep me from getting terrorist bombed. all it takes is the US not giving Israel billions of dollars a year or attacking countries on Israel's hit-list. If anything my government could protect me by spending LESS money.

you want to tell the world how america does all this... kool , but can you tell americans how these same agecies have kept them safe?

@GuhYeahRight "processes of the earth" --And who are you, Mr. Science? "tenants of science" --That's "tenets," friend, which also means "dogma." I though you were smart. Yet you're calling me & Palin stupid? Please. What have you accomplished in your life? More than she has? Let's hear it. I'll give you props if so. "you can't handle the truth" --Not your truth. "Palin is by far the scummiest of the scum" --Not many things in life work as well as the programming you've obviously received

@GuhYeahRight "scientific theory transcends dogma" --Sorry, I was trying to point out the irony. "I've shed my programming" --You've embraced your programming. "the failure of the status quo" --Oh, so this "hope & change" has worked out SO well. "conservative who has the nerve to bring up indoctrination, IRONIC?" --Not one bit. Tell me, how much Conservative programming hits the American People every day through its news media? Mmmm..... not a lot. So please, try that on someone else.

This is the DRAFT in sheeps clothing Any civilian can be involuntarily sent anywhere in the world to support military missions for up to two years.How is that any different from a DRAFT?the elite are underestimating the rebellious nature of people here, so to get it straight were all going to be drafted into the civilian military and basic training and weapons and then were going to turn around and police our friends and families?Make $ be a Snitch Narc TAX Collector, or a Hired Killer

@Longsday work that benefits leeches and parasites at the expense of people who actually contribute to society is what you are really saying.rob those who have worked for what they have and give it to those who suck off the blood of those who break their back to put food on the table for their families.yeah your right,that's not radical or socialist at all.socialism rewards failure and punishes success which is what obama is doing and what you support.no you're not brainwashed at all.

do you even see why obama wants a civ. force just as strong as the army? they (obama's handlers want to ruin America) want to transition from an offensive fighting force to a defensive force that only obeys the president (OWG), once this happens a case can be made that the armed forces is no longer needed and its costing too much to operate. follow the logic and past history on how fools of government operate. Brother i only hope we have the guts to do as the Indian hero Gandhi did.

re: LadyGreenEyes964 Will a US military site do? _ Defense Secretary, Robert Gates: "We must focus our energies beyond the guns and steel of the military, beyond just our brave soldiers, sailors, Marines, and airmen. We must also focus our energies on the other elements of national power that will be so crucial in the coming years. "What is clear to me is that there is a need for a dramatic increase in spending on the civilian instruments of national security" tinyurl(dot)com/3bzm4b

@GuhYeahRight "monopoly on Media" --Sure. Ever hear of ABC-Disney or Viacom? "complete propaganda" --From a Leftist point of view, I'm sure you believe it. "separated, rather than united" --If you can back up that claim with something concrete, please do. "Limbaugh" --SHAA! Yeah, talk radio is a HUGE portion of American media!!! You're great! "Beck" --The No2 show on 1 cable channel. "evangelical christians" --Now a buzzword from Leftists. To you, all Christians are "evangelicals."

This sounds like FEMA or the Red Cross or volunteer firefighters -- and I am all for it -- AND I HAVE PARTICIPATED IN SUCH ACTIVITIES myself. However, I want NO PART of groups like the BLACK PANTHERS or the SDS or Public Allies. Further, I'll have NOTHING to do with Rahm Emanuel's BROWN SHIRTS. Go ahead and put my name on your hit list. I am not part of your revolution. I am part of the counter-revolution. As of today, I have become a TRUE civil rights activist. Have a nice day.

re: usascommando666 Try this article out: Defense Secretary, Robert Gates: "We must focus our energies beyond the guns and steel of the military, beyond just our brave soldiers, sailors, Marines, and airmen. We must also focus our energies on the other elements of national power that will be so crucial in the coming years. "What is clear to me is that there is a need for a dramatic increase in spending on the civilian instruments of national security" tinyurl(dot)com/3bzm4b

"she is a complete idiot not capable of running a country." --Prime example of your programming. "She said she would have went to war with Russia in defense of Georgia" --Got a link for that? "She's out of touch with reality" --Because her opinions differ from yours. There's your programming kicking in again. I believe Obama's out of touch with reality. Would you accept that as solid, concrete analysis? "She probably thought it was Georgia, USA" --Right. I'm sure she did.

greyflcn: while I appreciate the humor in your response, It's actually pretty scary how liberal the Universities have become. When I was a student, some of our professors were openly hostile to the service men/women who were taking the classes through the GI bill. Shortly after I graduated Dr. Fred Rogers (aka Mr. Rogers, may he RIP)visited us to talk about early childhood education and was BOOED off the stage by gay activist...and this guy was on PBS for God's sake!

listen, obama doesnt know what hes doing, hes just good at talking and hes just a face, u can clearly see there is someone behind all this and they will tell obama what he needs to do, and obama will just keep talking people into this and that, cause thats what obama does best, also did u know if your dad is a muslim they have to give there son a muslim name, hmmm, barack hussein obama, what kind of name is this, keep your eyes and ears open, and u cannot be tricked

"Obama's idea endorsed by Bush The Obama transition team declined to comment on Broun's remarks. But spokesman Tommy Vietor said Obama was referring in the speech to a proposal for a civilian reserve corps that could handle postwar reconstruction efforts such as rebuilding infrastructure — an idea endorsed by the Bush administration." msnbc. msn. com/ id/27655039 Should also be noted the US Army Corp of Engineers, already has 34600 contracted civilians

re: usascommando666 Easy answer. The comment was unscripted, and he botched the delivery. greyfalcon. net/ peacecorp2 greyfalcon. net/ reservecorp However, the argument, the same as Gates gives, is that our foreign service that doesn't involve sanctions or military involvement is too small. And that it needs to be much larger. Because "soft power" around the world, should be nearly as crucial to our national security as "hard power".

It became clear by 1942 to many in the Wehrmacht that Hitler needed to be taken out - But what prevented Model, Manstein & Rommel from rolling into Berlin to remove Hitler? Answer: The SS If you see my other video, "Israel nuked Iraq", you would learn that 70% of the US military is against the US Government, (in fact, they fired on Paul Wolfowitz) Obama & his masters now look for a personal SS to protect them from their own generals

+DreamsCatcher101 "Americans for a better tomorrow, tomorrow"

Lol, yes

Does that mean that you support public pre-school but don't want union involvement?

That's because a lot of rational ideas have been politicized. For the right its things such as early childhood education, climate disruption, and healthcare while for the left its things like nuclear power and GMOs. 

yes, on everything

IT IS POLITICAL

+DaPhoneyRapperz "Putting extra money into the school system does not equal better results"Maybe not, but if we had more funding and more money to spend on teachers, more competent teachers would be likely to give a damn to apply for the job. It doesn't matter how much honorable intentions you have inside. If you don't have enough money to pay the bills, you're going to have to get a better job somewhere else. Also if you don't believe that our funding is all primarily on military spending, then you're fed straight up lies.

+DaPhoneyRapperz Hey imbecile we spend around 4 to 5 times on military compared to education so stop making this about your mindless party affiliation and look at the facts. You are too stupid to appreciate truth right in from of you because you have been fed an assembly line rhetoric.

I love how you got absolutely shit on in the comments

Could it be that liberals "run" the public education system because conservatives would throw it down the toilet if they could and only have the elite upper class rich who can afford private schools for their brats be educated at all, all in favor of expanding an overly interfering military that the government spends more on than the next 12 countries with the largest militaries COMBINED???

+ObservantHistorian it's true, Stephen Colbert taught us that conservatives speak from the "gut."

I know you can't be this stupid....is fox paying you to write this stuff or any another news channel? And how much?

+NonPartisanLiberal You shouldn't muddy a "conservative's" rant with facts. 

Are you looking at total money spent, or total spent per capita? There's a reason why we spend more total...we're FREAKIN' BIG! Per capita on the other hand...

Unfortunately your claims are entirely inconsistent with decades of peer-reviewed research.Did you actually just imply that the US spends more money on education than other industrialized nations?Are you serious? We currently rank #55 out of countries that spend the most on education per capita.We're behind Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, New Zealand, etc etc etc.All of whom have better ranking public school systems....What a surprise!

Da! Russia! Putin number 1!!

+Chirag Ganesh Thats so fucking irrelevant to the comment you responded to. 

Russia should have won the cold war. Go team Putin!!

No offense but teachers have lives as well. Sure some teachers might enjoy their job but its very hard to do your job if you have to pay stuff out of your own pocket or you have to deal with many students in once classroom.

+Ryuu Ainaki not exactly... It's not so much that the teachers we currently have would work better if we paid them more, it's that we could afford the brighter minds who would normally turn down the job due to the pay, and we get stuck with either crappy teachers and good ones that just happen to not care for the money (that is hard to find, meaning good teachers are hard to find.)

Ummm... what?! Are you kidding me? Because according to non-Fox News statistics, The United States is 55th in Education Spending (Source:UNDP). A mere 5.5% of GPA. And in terms of raw dollars, several european countries spend more. And yes, while I do agree there is no correlation between general spending and success, there is a correlation between paying a person and job performance. If we pay teachers more then their miserable salaries for long hours of hard work, they will perform better and better mold our young minds. I'm just saying, trim the military budget by 100 billion or so to pay for things that 95% of americans will actually use.

+Neosaigo Thanks for the insightful comment.  My 33 yo Son and 31 yo Daughter got excellent public school educations and my Son is now an Engineer and my Daughter an Elementary School Teacher.  Parent involvment to make sure the kids take the toughest Preperatory Classes made available and select a good State University is vital.  Some kids just cruise through school and barely learn to read because of huge class sizes.  Teacher to student ratio seems to be more vital than any other single symptom that plagues our California Public Schools.  I can't speak for the Large City Schools because we are in a Rural County.  My Daughter got Straight "A"s all through High School and 98% "A"s in University AND she took the hardest classes offered, so the student has a lot to do with it too.  That's where the Parent's Role is the strongest advantage. 

+Neosaigo Actually because of federal government standards, my state dropped in school performance... Not really an appropriate argument to make.  Either the local area cares about schools or they don't.  Either way it's going to succeed or fail without the government.  But with federal government standards, its bound to drop unless money was the specific problem for the school.  My state's schools were great because they set the standard across the nation in schools.  Because the federal government got involved and started mandating the curriculum, grades dropped statewide.  It's not a black and white issue when republicans look at it, and its certainly not a black and white issue when democrats look at it.  Think hard before you make comments about this in the future.

Actually that is because the schools in the U.S are not unified like the education system in other countries.A person educated in California for example is quite different than someone educated in Mississippi.These days doing things efficiently through a central body is considered "socialism", which is why America is a mess because while some state have world class excellent educations, there are a lot more states with shitty schools.You are right, for most red southern state, the problem is not so much money, but the Anti-Intellectualism related Theism.  However, for states that already have their acts together, the extra money helps a lot especially if we are to reform education.If you actually pay attention to the way education is run in this country you will see that it is not efficient, not because of wasted money, but because of people who think personal beliefs is more important than facts.  For example, the textbooks used by the country is printed in Texas, a backward regressive state that is constantly undermining education.  When we have a culture that doesn't want to educate, just to brainwash children with a set of beliefs, all the money in the world won't do any good.  However, it doesn't mean the problem is with wasted money, but wasted opportunity.  Blame parents.

It's typically because of where we put the money, dick-wad.  Adding another grade before school starts, has actually proven... need I repeat "PROVEN" to actually get results.  Yes, lots of waste in the education system.  Biggest problem is where the money goes, not really that we are spending it.

Pre-School is important and even though my kids and grandkids didn't go to the "Government" schools they benefited greatly from attending private Pre-Schools.  Problem is not everybody can afford Private Schooling and not everyone has enough education under their belt to "Home School" their kids.  So yes, we as a Nation should fund Head Start for the unfortunate kids whose parents can't afford Private Schooling.  It is money well invested even if it only helps 50% of the kids that attend.  20 years from now I want Tax PAYERS not Welfare Recipients.  Education is a much better investment than Welfare and Food Stamps if you compare Dollar to Dollar...

And we spend more money on the military when such money would better be spent on education to provide supplies. Many schools are forced to make their teachers buy their own supplies.

"Educate yourself"? What's wrong is the way kids are being taught. If changing it means spending a little bit of the military budget on education, isn't that beneficial for everyone in the end?

Just as the name, it's actually, "phony" [whispers].

"Educate yourself." The irony behind that statement is hilarious and sad.