Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?

Campbell university dpt Videos

Campbell University | Meet J. Bradley Creed | Pt. 2

New Campbell University President-elect J. Bradley Creed discusses his initial impressions of Campbell.

Campbell University Cheer Epic Pt 3

Some highlights from our cheer season 2011-2012...Go Camels!

User Comments

https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-Kt0b9wXZHvY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/pmbmaOPopqk/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
If you go to the gocamels.com website and look under cheerleading, and then the news tab there should be an article showing that tryouts set for April 29th and 30th, and under that article are the requirements for this past years tryouts.
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-BFlJbhpppYc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/QqTtvkBUNW4/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Okay thanks and are there two seperate tryouts for spring and fall or is it just a whole season ?
https://gp4.googleusercontent.com/-fhgB4uCwjNQ/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/bu4rd_mSFnQ/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
great video! i guess this takes alot of practise to get right
https://gp5.googleusercontent.com/-Fg5Psv4o7JQ/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/Z4noDzJY1BU/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Does Campbell have an all-girl team? Or only Coed?
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-BFlJbhpppYc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/QqTtvkBUNW4/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
what are the requirements?
https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-Kt0b9wXZHvY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/pmbmaOPopqk/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
Only Co ed at this time
https://gp3.googleusercontent.com/-Kt0b9wXZHvY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/pmbmaOPopqk/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
One for the whole year
https://gp6.googleusercontent.com/-BFlJbhpppYc/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/QqTtvkBUNW4/s48-c-k-no/photo.jpg?sz=64
.Oh Okay, Thanks.

Campbell University | Meet J. Bradley Creed | Pt. 5

Campbell University | Meet J. Bradley Creed | Pt. 4

Campbell University | Meet J. Bradley Creed | Pt. 1

New Campbell University President-elect J. Bradley Creed talks about what drew him to Buies Creek.

Campbell University | Meet J. Bradley Creed | Pt. 3

Tom Campbell: Spokane Workshop Pt 1/2

"Tom Campbell is one of the great thinkers of our age" comments Dr Eric Cunningham of Gonzaga in his introduction at the Spokane event May 18, 2014. Topics ...

User Comments

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Dear Mr. Tom Campbell, I agree with most of the things you coverd during this video, except the when you mention that belief (that it somehow makes us close-minded. You believe the world we are in is a VR, well that is belief, you believe Love lower the entropy, that's belief too!?). On the other hand I agree with you about the Internet (how it makes information more accessable) , and making adding up the those litle enlightenment buobles to a bigger entity. One question though, have you solution on how to overcome, in my mind, the biggest barrier called language in order to make the information accessable to as many people as possible? After all, we all we all seem to looking/searching the Truth(s), wich is promised to set us free and make us evolve. Last but not least, I want to thank You for spreading/promting Love, thank You :)
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-t3nHxyqt3Eo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAC8/brnmo-MlKJg/photo.jpg?sz=64
Ali Sajedi: "You believe the world we are in is a VR, well that is belief, you believe Love lower the entropy, that's belief too!?)." No, neither is a belief.  Both are the logical results of the MBT model of reality and existence (MBT theory).  The value of a model is how well it fits the known experimental data and whether or not it can lead to a more general scientific understanding.  Belief has no part in any scientific theory or model -- a model succeeds or fails based on how scientifically useful it is.  Open minded but also skeptical is the only way forward.Yes, the language barrier is a major problem... but, thanks to the internet, even that problem is diminishing with time.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-qxZwRj-XSGY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAACTw/wXyJwKRp0fg/photo.jpg?sz=64
Again a nice explanation of your theory Tom. Yet, that's somewhat of the problem I have with all your talks, it never passes the stadium of yet another 'nice explanation'. Although you always mention it, you never pay much attention to your time with Bob Monroe and the scientific 'proof' you got with the experiments you did, during those days. I would very much like to hear a little bit more about the 'proof' from back then. But I also wonder why you don't do more experiments today, which would support your theory. What happened with the alleged collaboration between you and Dean Radin. Why not setup some controlled experiments with results that would support your theory. Wouldn't it enlarge your credibility exponentially? 
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-qxZwRj-XSGY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAACTw/wXyJwKRp0fg/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Tom Campbell Thanks, I'll look into it. Maybe you could refer to these articles more often (and publish them on your website). I would also love to know more about the experiments you did back in the days with Monroe and which convinced you that what you were doing was actually 'real'. 
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-t3nHxyqt3Eo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAC8/brnmo-MlKJg/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Boudewijn Rooseboom Yes, I agree with you completely.  Here is the experiment that explains my discussion of the double slit.  Most wouldn't want to see it, but I am glad you asked.  //xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/9903/9903047v1.pdf 
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-qxZwRj-XSGY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAACTw/wXyJwKRp0fg/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Tom Campbell Thank you for your response. And although I understand and would agree with what was said, I don't think it covers my question completely. For one thing, I (having had a scientific education myself) think it would at the very least be helpful if claims were supported by evidence. Maybe you (or MBT) could set up an overview of the experiments done and refer to them more often. It could be that the scientific community disregards them (for all sorts of reasons), but I think that at the same time a lot of people - me including - who do not have a reputation to protect, would find it extremely helpful and convincing. Furthermore, it seems that your approach with expressing your theory is to skip the scientific community all together and speak directly to the individual layman (youtube etc.) for the obvious reasons. Why then suddenly use the scientific community as an argument to not be scientific about it? Aren't you throwing out the baby with the bath water? Why not leave the right of judgement to the individual your directly speaking to. I think you would address a lot of people in your audience (and even amplify it) when you would provide them with the research and evidence that you say was already done and would support your theory. Wouldn't it be a classic win win situation?  
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-t3nHxyqt3Eo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAC8/brnmo-MlKJg/photo.jpg?sz=64
Something recently posted by Donna on the MBT Forum that speaks directly to this question: //www.my-big-toe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=8954#p80652
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-VOU8QVW4Yb4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAC0/zM_N11bxSVY/photo.jpg?sz=64
Sorry for my English. I mean small piece.
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-t3nHxyqt3Eo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAC8/brnmo-MlKJg/photo.jpg?sz=64
Joe, it is extremely, extremely unlikely that the LCS would delete you.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-msuyNoEwkPo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAFGM/oWmqKuEoL_s/photo.jpg?sz=64
If everything we experience is just virtual reality, is self-enquiry even worth the bother? With the limited probability options available to us, couldn't we just let the experience be & let the VR roll on, effortlessly, rather than trying to get larger than the game that someone else started, that something else is playing and that who knows who will shut off when he/she/they get bored of it?
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-t3nHxyqt3Eo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAC8/brnmo-MlKJg/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Devendra Tak Of course it is worth the bother...your consciousness is not virtual.  It is like poor little helpless arms, legs, and heart think it is not worth the bother to move because the big boss brain seems to run everything.   Getting "larger than the game that someone else started" is not the point.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Thanx for good information. I have read about the Stone Campbell movement what do you think about that? 
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-t3nHxyqt3Eo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAC8/brnmo-MlKJg/photo.jpg?sz=64
+Ola Normann  Ancient history (from my personal perspective) that has nothing to do with me.

Unlocking the Cage with Johnny Campbell pt. 2

A follow up interview with Johnny Campbell during a Brown University sociology class. Johnny is a professional MMA fighter out of MA.

Tom Campbell MBT Forum March 2011 Pt 1/5

Tom Campbell's My Big TOE forum has some of the most advanced information and discussions on our existence and our roles in this life available anywhere.

User Comments

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-w-Emdr0Rvjs/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAACU/Gb2r2YQ8zsA/photo.jpg?sz=64
Does the wave function collapse based on whether there is potential for consciousness to perceive the data of the detectors or does the data collapse the wave function merely by being present in the reality?
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-t3nHxyqt3Eo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAC8/brnmo-MlKJg/photo.jpg?sz=64
The wave function collapses (a "physical" particle is produced in PMR) when a measurement is made of (data collected on) that "physical" particle.  This measurement forces the LCS to produce the "result of the measurement" in the PMR VR based upon the various probabilities associated with all possible results.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XdUIqdMkCWA/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/4252rscbv5M/photo.jpg?sz=64
Tom who is behind the Source Code ? Source Code - Official Trailer [HD] amazing movie that come so close to the reality as digital information Source Code - Official Trailer [HD]
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-t3nHxyqt3Eo/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAC8/brnmo-MlKJg/photo.jpg?sz=64
The LCS evolved the initial conditions, rule-set, and the processing capability, then punched the "run" button.  After that ("big digital bang"), the PMR VR we call our universe began to evolve in a probability based simulation until it became the wondrous marvel we live in today.  Of course it is still evolving.  We IUOCs receive a data stream that defines what our avatar experience in the PMR VR and we IUOCs make choices accordingly.  Those PMR VR experiences, of which our avatar body is a part, are limited or constrained by what is possible and supported within the VR  -- i.e., by the rule-set and how the rule-set driven, probability based VR (including all the avatars being played) happened to evolve up to the present time.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment