Baltimore ravens apparel amazon Videos

exactly

+Seth HaterLooked like the same Pitta to me.

+Seth Hater Maybe he'll be a better player. Manning and Peterson came back from injuries practically being better than what they were.  

won't be the same player

+therage909 That could've been said about Ravens last year, yet they got hot at the end and won SB. Hell, back in 2011, the Ravens won against teams with winning records and lost against teams with losing records. The Ravens are unpredictable.

You have beaten teams that suck or that are average

you are very excited for 8-8

agree

thank you

Dolphins

didnt you give up after the Cleveland game

as you should

Does it give better items to the players in the back? Never noticed that at least in the earlier installments, they just have been more useful if you are in the back.

I have a rather large pile of games and pre-orders saying otherwise, but to each their own. :)

Especially when the other item is Mario Kart, I thought it was Touhou as well. XD

+kramcas2  Why?

HAHA! I hate it too haha

Yea a real man is tough enough to handle a slap from a woman. I saw the video, he was in no real danger that he had to defend himself.

+Broc Stefan Here's the source: //espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/11503851/ray-rice-videotape-sent-nfl-executive-april

+VeryTraumatic- Guns, Games, Gym  Was that in front of a grand jury? serious question. Cause what kind of an idiot would incriminate himself when he's not under oath?Both men involved should get fined, neither of them should lose their job.If the people really wanted athletes to act with self-control, even when intoxicated, then they wouldn't spend so much money when these huge beef cakes run into each other.

...exactly. If you see my comment above, I did say I think he deserves a chance to play in the league again.The person we should be most angry at is Goodell for the cover up. Law enforcement had access to the video when they questioned both him and his wife. So did the NFL when they handed out his 2 game suspension.

I got you to think.

Shut the fuck up, towel head ass goat fucker. See, I can be racist too. What did I accomplish? Nothing. Neither did you.

The dildo spit in her face and then mike tysoned her...but that's just the bandwagon talking

I'll make a selfie vlog about my thoughts on this whole situation, but here's a quick summary-Ray Rice lost a lot of respect for good reason. He did make an unforgivable mistake, and the Ravens were right to terminate him for ethical and business reasons. However, he's a fierce competitor on the field, very active in anti-bullying campaigns off the field, and an all around more successful person than I'll ever be. He should have the chance to play again once he served out his punishment. The media has really made it easy to jump on the bandwagon, just as you said. This whole "challenge" is tongue-in-cheek, calling the keyboard warriors to put their money where their mouths are. If they really feel so strongly about domestic violence, they should do something about it except writing angry YouTube and Twitter comments. Strong attitudes are worthless without any amount of action. 

STFU you stupid liberal, he can shoot it if he wants to it his right you know.

Please kill yourself

Comment status: TrollExperience Level: Below Basic

Your my hero, big strong man.

who is this Asian moron lol.. btw kid, the shallow golod digger skank deserved to get hit, period.. all of you kids are clueless brain washed morons,  ..this is a femnist agenda garbage..

You are fucking stupid.

+kejohn6666 Where there is a will, there is a way. Remove the guns and those who wish to do harm will look for alternative ways to inflict damage. They will look to the black markets, smuggling, government/military/law enforcement. And if that is to hard, making bombs is just a click away on the internet. Instead of focusing on weapon restriction, (some restrictions are good and absolutely necessary), we should be focusing on the causes of mass violence. Better schools, better healthcare, better support for the mentally unstable. etc. etc.

I have an AR 15 i shoot it about 2 3 times a year the ONLY reason i bought it was because the government wants to take them away. Trying to take away guns has only caused people to buy more.

Look at countries where their strict on gun laws, they have gun smuggling rings so you will NEVER take guns away from those who wish to do evil.

+Grunt Snuffy no you miss understand me..I don't want to get rid of guns..I want to reduce the amount of guns..btw you did say that the amount stabbings has gone up..well let me just say you kill fewer people with knives than you do with an AR-15 don't you think..I rarely hear about mass murder with knives it almost always with high power automatic rifles

+Grunt Snuffy no you miss understand me..I don't want to get rid of guns..I want to reduce the amount of guns..btw you did say that the amount stabbings has gone up..well let me just say you kill fewer people with knives than you do with an AR-15 don't you think..I rarely hear about mass murder with knives it almost always with high power automatic rifles

+kejohn6666 No i dont have any negative thoughts twards guns, however i can certainly see how someone could.

Getting rid of guns and violence is a noble idea, however it will never happen, if the government took guns away from the people the government would keep theirs and that is more frightening to me than everyone having a gun. Look at the UK they are not allowed to have guns and assaults with knifes went up, also look at the states where their are more gun restrictions here in the U.S. statistics show their is more crime.

+Grunt Snuffy true.. and sorry for your loss..but question..that doesn't give you any negative feelings towards guns.. And I just want that other racist clown to see that two adults can agree to disagree on a topic and still be civil towards each other

+Grunt Snuffy true.. and sorry for your loss..but question..that doesn't give you any negative feelings towards guns.. And I just want that other racist clown to see that two adults can agree to disagree on a topic and still be civil towards each other

+Grunt Snuffy OK I see your point ..however its just my opinion that i don't see how shooting a jersey can make anybody think non-violence..isn't this suppose to be about stopping domestic violence but he uses a gun to get his point across ..I guess won't ever get it.

+kejohn6666 Well that would be me. My dad killed my mom then himself, the gun he used was just a tool. My dad was the killer not the gun.

+kejohn6666 Im not gun nut (i do own a few guns) and i have a few friends who are and like you i dont understand it however this video is not of a gun nut, liking to shoot guns doesnt make you a gun nut like you said and thats all he did was shoot a jersey, not promoting violence.

+Grunt Snuffy and the guns have never killed anyone people have remark ..with all due respect is extremely weak and a cop out..tell, that to the families who have lost loved ones to gun violence

+Grunt Snuffy I'm not against guns.. I have shot several at a firing range and you are correct I actually did enjoy it..but if you read my last reply..I'm talking about the gun owners who want everything from silencers to 500 bullit belt fed machine guns to rocket launchers and won't stop until they can mine their front yard with land mines..I'm for all hand guns and most rifles.. But it seems alot of gun owners just don't know when to draw the line

Before you stand against guns you should buy one and go to the range a few times, 99% of people who hate guns do so because they have never been around guns and never fired one. Besides a gun has never killed anyone, only people.

+kejohn6666 You are complaining about the wrong thing though. That's the whole point. My analogy is fine, it's not guns nor gun nuts want of them killing people. Besides, if you have the "right" to bitch about them, I have the right to bitch about the bitchers. lol

every day

+btea100 I wish ..lol

+kejohn6666 TONY STARK

+Nathan Moon just as you have a right to have a gun..I have a right to complain about it..and your analogy is so off base..really..comparing an ar-15 to a knife..really???!!!..I have no problems with guns..its just a lot of you gun owners take it 9 steps to far..you want everything ..500 hundred bullet belt fed ammo drums..silencers.. Guns that can bring down planes. What's next surface to air missiles .hand grenades weapons grade plutonium..

+kejohn6666 Talk about un-evolved. Why do people like you bitch so much about gun violence. Guns are not the problem, people are the problem. You don't blame the knife when someone gets stabbed do you? 

+Jose Fernandez and you are a gay ass bitch talking about sucking dicks and wondering how I look..you just blew your closet wide open bitch didn't you..lol..hope you and Carlos are enjoying each other

+Jose Fernandez suuuuuure you don't live in mexico Tito...bitch go eat a fuckin taco and smuggle your fukin drugs bitch...you probably stealing somebody's internet bitch..so eat a dick tito

+kejohn6666 Stupid idiot i live in mexico. Thats why i bet you look like Fucking E.T Stupid ass bitch. Why dont you suck Ray Rice's dick already.

+btea100 its my opinion and if you don't like I could care less

+Jose Fernandez look here you wet back bitch..I can say whatever the fuck I want and if your punk ass don't like it swim the fuck back to mexico..OK bitch..you real tough behind your mamas keyboard aren't you

+kejohn6666 look how evolved you are with your internet iron man-ness..

Nigga shut the fuck up you stupid clown. You read the title. Why click it then ?

+kejohn6666 No shooting things isn't the only way we can express ourselves, it's just a way we prefer. VeryTraumatic asked his subscribers what they wanted him to do with his jersey and they almost all said to shoot it, as his channel is about guns too. Hell, if they had said trade it for a piece of bologna he would have. And I don't seem to be shooting a weapon while expressing my opinion here either, I'm typing on a keyboard. Quit being such a narrow minded child and learn that there's several different people with different hobbies. Your hobbies may look barbaric and clownish to others, and I feel like you're the kind of person who thinks everything he does is right, and if someone says otherwise, they are wrong. Learn to accept other's points of view and opinions if they aren't doing you any harm.

+Baker cat wow ...so I'm beating my wife .sounds Like you're projecting,....why does that statement not surprise me moron.. sounds like a statement coming from someone without much grey matter..again coming from clowns who spend their time shooting jerseys to get in touch with their so called feelings

+kejohn6666 And your evolved yourself. You should think about this as less gun violence and more that he's trying and is promoting something good. Like stopping domestic abuse/violence. So before you go calling people un-evolved and making it sound like your calling them savages, you should take a brake from beating your wife and go support a good cause.

+Daniel Sanchez I know clown the only way you can express yourself are articulate a thought is by shooting something...you are so evolved...lol

+kejohn6666 yeah... shooting someone's jersey full of bullets... yeah... that's being real violent... right?He's not hurting anyone, and shooting is just another sport. Just because someone does something like this doesn't mean they're a gun nut you imbecile. Destroying a shirt isn't violent in the slightest. It's simply a way to express their anger toward a player once respected by his fans, and it's not hurting anyone.

+Scott Prokopek yeah..shooting someone's jersey full of bullets..yeah ..that's being a real man and an adult..right?

Typical liberal comment

+mssb1922 I doubt they will but I would like for them to.  If they are truly about this whole cleaning up the league spiel they've been giving us they'll be better off learning to make a statement and show they care before the "public outcry" has any bearing on what you do.  Or at least learn to pretend to care better.

I'm a Bills fan I thought we were going to have a Defense :( Its not super Mario its more like small mario. I think Buffalo needs to ground and pound don't expose the QB or Defense. Another year no playoffs.

Green Bay is in 3rd place in the NFC North. That doesn't sound like the best to me. I can't wait until my Vikings play Houston. Now THAT will be a test. We'll see Green Bay twice in December.

@wiz9496 the Texans are gonna put A.D. in cuffs like HPD did at a nightclub this offseason. Percy harvin won't look like an MVP on the eve if christmas eve 2012. Go Texans!

How long is he out? The reason I'm asking is 'cuz my Vikings are due to play the Texans on Dec. 23rd. It should be an awesome game.

I met Randle at a high school football game. I talked to him for about a half hour. He is one of the coolest guys I've ever met.

Have the Green Bay Packers been swallow by planet earth? That is the only way the Texans are the best team in the NFL...

Absolutely! 100% Texas football rocks! We got the sorry Panthers to cheer for here in the Carolinas. Sad, sad, sad....

Hahaha! That was pretty funny bout how we found a sucka in buffalo! too funny! GO TEXANS!!!!!!!

HAHA look who's laughing now ET, Baltimore in the Super Bowl!

The ravens got crushed by the "Bulls on Parade"

Texan's baby! Bob McNair is from my hometown.

I just wish we still had Brian Cushing

Bring ur team to Baltimore

I feel your pain my man.

Thanks Bruce.

Come on man!

Go Texans!

Ye sir.

+DiamondofGames Da hast du Recht, macht auch ganz guten Spaß :)

+fifapro11033 kein Problem :)/Raphael 

oh sorry

Stand doch am Anfang drin, dass etwas schief ging mit dem ingame sound

+Rock$Disigner22© Hey, das wünschen sich in der tat viele, soll ich das wirklich mal wagen? :D Ich fühle mich noch nicht Solo gut bei Madden NFL 15 :D Aber das klappt hoffentlich dieses Jahr noch :D/Raphael 

Nicely said...........

+Colm Donnelly I will say that it seems to me that the wind is changing here.  Gradually the Glen Beck types are becoming more marginalized.  The only downside there is that they are becoming more agitated too.  I think we are about ten years from catching up with the rest of the civilized world.  If we don't start WW III in that time I think we'll be fine.  

Cheers, likewise!Clarity of thought doesn't seem to be in any real abundance as far as conservative American chatter is concerned. Still, that's their problem; the rest of the healthy, free world (full of potential illegal immigrants) just finds the verbal diarrhea-afflicted Fox News Republican types hilarious.Honestly, first time I saw Glen Beck, I thought he was a comedic caricature. Nothing could prepare me for how actually scared, panicked and paranoid such types are - it isn't all that funny now, I just feel a bit sorry for them. It must be a pretty horrible existence being so paranoid...

+Colm Donnelly I like the clarity of your thought sir!  

+Robert Laurence Get free healthcare, and they can all be treated - more healthy, tax paying citizens. Sorted!

+Robert Laurence I'm really comfortable with the process how it is.  I don't see a crisis.  I am not emotional about the issue.  The best way to sum it up is that I am no more worried about immigrants from Mexico than I am immigrants from Canada.  

+No WayYou do realize that the ones who get busted at the border are checked for infectious diseases like TB, and some have it.  No ones saying ALL illegals are diseased but for fuck sake are You really comfortable with just letting the ones that are carrying infectious diseases right on through??

+Conglo88 "no one obeys or respects the law"  The implication being that immigrants don't respect the law.  A country is considered "third world" based on poverty.  It has nothing to do with whether the people who live there obey or respect the law.If your argument here is that immigrants are law breakers when they come here illegally, then would it be alright to give them amnesty and make "legal"?  I care very much about the future of the country.  The people who are against immigration are almost always against things like the dream act.  If the concern is about the US, then why would you want to turn away people who have demonstrated that they want to come here and contribute to the economy?  Immigrants have consistently contributed to American prosperity.    

+No Way We have something like 15 million illegals in this country; living here illegally! I don't want the US to become a third world country where no one obeys or respects the law. I guess caring about the future of the county is just too extreme for you.

+Conglo88 60,000 immigrant children in a country of 314 million is hardly a flood. Seeing immigrants as "diseased" is exactly the kind of thing that I was talking about in the original post.  You obviously have a strong fear of people you perceive as outsiders and need to rationalize the fear.  

Yep, just flood the country with diseased illegals. Sounds like a really smart plan. Who would be against that?  

+Autumnleaf2011Because Multiculturalism only works if their is a clear 70%+ majority of one ethnicity. Its only then its possible to ignore integration problems without too much downfall. This because while Multiculturalism dosent promote factionalism. They accept that larger groups do not want to integrate,... in the naive name of tolerance.In Israel, if one look a little past the conflict, they are surrounded by another culture so its not surprising they have a xenophobic like nature. Most places where larger groups are more equal, but still keep to themselves. People are generally more xenophobic once everything comes down to it. Add a lack of resources as well, food, electricity etc, and the symptoms will be even more visible. (Example: Poor: African tribes or Rich: Florida many ethnicities and social issues)In my view Multiculturalism just opens one up for 4th colonization of "territory" (social issues, not sovereignty), aka ghettofication of areas. Because it lowers the focus on integration,... the process of making people of different backgrounds having something in common (eg, lower level nationalism, belonging despite visual differences etc), and ignores many social issues that show symptoms, but will only become problems when that group, regardless of ethnicity, becomes larger. (Examples: Whites in South Africa willfully being segregated from blacks, even today!)Which in turn, when the problems have become visual to most citizens, make more of them turn towards right wing views. The latter, being something I do not like...--------------As a Social Democrat, the "inventors" of Multiculturalism, I would much rather have a larger focus on integration and commonalities than the future factionalism, A Game of Thrones environment if you like, Multiculturalism seems to produce.--------------Obviously many Social Democrats do not agree with me on this, but I hope this gave you a wider view on the subject...

Who are you talking about?  Are you even talking about a given person have two contradictory opinions. 

Probably because the cultures surrounding their own country suck.

Yea but the difference here is those were white christians from russia.Americans don't like brown people.

everyone talks ashit saying obama loves immigrants if iam not mistaken didnt ronald reagan give amnesty to millions of immigrants legalized them 

Conservative America is extremely Racist and Classist(if that's a word)....If you have money in America, you are free...It depends on your definition of freedom  once you understand how screwed up our government is.....Like the man said...We need more registered Latino voters.....Get em out to Vote, because voting is the voice of America...

+Rob McCune hahahaha derp fit sounds about right!Isn't America supposed to be land of the free, following the good Christian teaching of "love they neighbour" etc? 

+Conglo88 As soon as it starts happening in america. And it has to be really happening not some conservative throwing a derp fit on fox news.

So when can I come to your country, have a bunch of anchor babies and live off the government?

"Dey derkerjerbs!!!" - Conservatives on the subject of Immigration

Maybe if he had only had a gun he wouldn't have gotten himself crucified... Then again, we'd all be going to Hell.

+Richard de la Tour Exactly! Unfortunately, politics is fueled to a great extent by successfully attaching unreasonable fear to certain words along with an obsessive need of some to belong to group which shuns all outsiders.

+Lee Reynolds I think you pretty much nailed it. If we could get past the "Red Scare" and have an honest conversation that included socialist and capitalist ideas and solutions we might get somewhere. Neither system is evil and neither system has all the answers.

+Richard de la Tour I always view socialism as simply capitalism with a human touch. After all, if you want to provide education and healthcare to citizens, you have to rake in the monies to do it. I don't buy into the canard that socialism kills incentive/profit; it simply humanizes the way in which one earns money.Yes, an energy company can earn more money by avoiding regulations, but that destroys the environments in which people live. Thus, regulate and build long-term profits and a stabilized economy.It was so interesting yesterday that Fox's economists were praising Canada yesterday. The gentleman remarked that he used to make fun of the Canadian dollar, which he now praises. Without reflection, this gentleman remarked that the Canadian dollar is stronger after the housing crash. He equated it, with natural ignorance, to tax rates, neglecting to mention that Canada's banks were more strongly regulated.Corporate tax rates can be lower (like Canada's) if there is a better minimum standard of living--wage, education, healthcare--provided to citizens. Also, they don't seem to have the same corporate loopholes that we have.I don't understand why people neglect to think that our corporations are the biggest welfare queens, if I may borrow that dog-whistle term. On paper the tax rate is 35 percent, but we know some of the biggest corporations are not only subsidized but pay nothing. 

+whyamimrpink78 First of all Obama is no socialist. Secondly we already have socialism and it works. It ain't perfect but we couldn't survive without it. A modern society needs both socialism and capitalism. A capitalist prison system would totally suck . . . oh wait we have that and yes it sucks. National defense, education, roads, police, fire protection all socialized.

I thought she was from Alaska............Yep. Born in Idaho, then Alaska, college in Hawaii, then back to Alaska. Not Southern. 

+whyamimrpink78 Socialism does not lead to tyranny. Your ideas are antiquated. Hitler was a conservative, and the Nazi movement was a right-wing movement. Read David Crowe's book The Holocuast: Roots, History, & Aftermath. Don't forget about Pinochet, the right-wing dictator. Moreover, Orwell repeatedly stated the the USSR and Stalin pulled the peaceful leftists in Spain to the right.Socialism does not necessarily require centralization of powers. Orwell was, specifically, a democratic socialist. This means that people are given more democratic rights at the federal and local power. For example, democratic socialists understand that the workplace is often times a tyranny. A place you go to and have no rights and no say. However, democratic socialists believe that all workers, not just union workers, should be able to vote on things.You have made no points. You don't understand Orwell, and you don't understand socialism. I just got done telling you that I studied Orwell under a professor who wrote his first authorized biography. (And, no, the professor was not a socialist. He was inclined toward libertarian/anarchism.)If I learned about what you think, I'd probably just shake my head and call you confused. Ever hear of the Dunning-Kruger effect? You suffer from that, my friend. I just told you that a man who is considered an expert in Orwell taught me about him, and still you deny the truth and ramble. You are not even aware of your ignorance, which is the first step toward becoming intelligent.Your opinion means nothing, really. Opinions are uniformed. I KNOW Orwell was a socialist. Read Homage to Catalina, where he talks about fighting for the Marxist Worker Party against Spanish dictators and Stalin. Read his essays, where he describes what socialism is and why he is a socialist. Then, study democratic socialism. Hell, there is even a democratic socialist party in America, to which Cornel West is a member.For god's sake, man, read a book. You talk BS and cite nothing. Notice I provide evidence. Because I read!!!

+111q222p333m444zyea.

+Lee Reynolds Socialism is such a broad term.  Bernie Sanders considers himself a socialist but his thinking leads to tyranny.  Giving the federal government, which covers over 300 million people, that much power leads to corruption and is hard to regulate. That is one of my problems when people quote Orwell and say he is a socialist when it comes to supporting socialism at the federal level.  Orwell wanted control of the government.  Having too much government I just as bad as no government.  So while one can support socialism they can also support control of the government and free market ideas.  That system is set up differently in each country.  A country like Iceland with their population and being an island has different issues to deal with than the US and thus set up the system differently.Where I am getting with all this is that calling Orwell a socialist to me is too broad and doesn't tell the whole story of what he really was.  Sanders is a socialist but has no problem attacking freedom and rights of certain people.  Obama is a socialist and hasn't been that transparent of an administration and they should be.  Cornell West could be a socialist but I consider his ideas completely radical and dangerous to the success of the US.  If you learned about my ideas you could call me a socialist because I do support socialism at the state level but at the federal level I support very limited power.  Someone being a socialist puts them in too broad of a range which is why I don't like labeling Orwell as one.  Now you claim to have studied Orwell and if you did then I respect that and you should know more than me.  That is just my opinion of it though.

+whyamimrpink78 You don't understand what socialism is. Socialists oppose government tyranny. Hell, the only party to oppose Hitler and the Nazis (the fake socialists, who co-opted the name) was the social democrats. Have you heard of Eugene Debs? The man who was arrested for protesting World War I? Ever hear of Cornel West, a huge critic of Obama?  All of these men were socialists.Socialism is not synonymous with big government or tyranny. People believe this because of American propaganda. Please refer to the book 'The Mighty Wurlitzer', which covers the CIA's anti-liberal propaganda. Hell, they even appropriated Orwell and perverted his message when they made the cartoon Animal Farm, which is Orwell's attack on fake socialism!!!Orwell was a socialist. I studied Orwell under Dr. Michael Shelden, who wrote his first authorized biography. Please refer to Orwell's essay "Why I Write": "Every line of serious work I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic Socialism"   

+whyamimrpink78 Orwell was a socialist. I studied Orwell under Dr. Michael Shelden, who wrote his first authorized biography. Please refer to Orwell's essay "Why I Write": "Every line of serious work I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic Socialism"  

+111q222p333m444z It is debated on what Orwell really was. I don't consider him a socialist because he opposed government tyranny and any government that is powerful enough to give you something is powerful to take it away.  Orwell would agree with that.Orwell seemed to support democracy in having a government but controlling it at the same time.  So not having to much government but not having enough.  Socialism is very broad and I am sure Orwell disagreed with several socialist policies.  I am sure Orwell would disagree with the US in the NSA program that is ran by a socialism.  People tend to pick and choose what Orwell was.  He supported a balance of government and control of it.  So he did support some socialist policies but not all.  So to me, at least, he was not a socialist.  But he wasn't a capitalist either.  

+D The TruthHenry Kissinger is not king of Earth, and so what? Most people think we need a 'New World Order' of sorts. I constantly hear about US imperialism, the UN, the IMF, capitalism is broken, free trade is bad, we need to stop intervening, this that and everything is fucked etc. No one is happy with the current world order except for capitalist profiteers. People in power want change, people without power want change, and we all have a different idea of what that change should be. He wants a new world order, I want a new world order, you no doubt want a new world order.That could mean anything - it could mean going back to city states, or everyone going communist, or China becoming the new dominant power, or everyone being united under a worldwide government. I'm guessing the latter is what you're worried about, so let me put your mind at ease - a world government is not only likely, it is inevitable. It is the natural way we'll progress having gone from little tribes in the woods to cities, kingdoms, nations, empires, federations etc.It will happen, and some day that united Earth government will send humans to build new civilizations on other worlds. Automated technology will have rendered capitalism obsolete, and humans will live and work together for the common advancement of our species under a loose federation of free peoples. I know the thought terrifies you, but I wouldn't worry - it will happen long after you're dead. No, the new world order we can look forward to is the one that will come before it - Chinese domination.

+whyamimrpink78Quotes from the man himself:"I have seen wonderful things and at last really believe in Socialism, which I never did before.""A real Socialist is one who wishes – not merely conceives it as desirable, but actively wishes – to see tyranny overthrown.""Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism, as I understand it.""For some years past I have managed to make the capitalist class pay me several pounds a week for writing books against capitalism. But I do not delude myself that this state of affairs is going to last forever ... the only regime which, in the long run, will dare to permit freedom of speech is a socialist regime. If fascism triumphs I am finished as a writer – that is to say, finished in my only effective capacity. That of itself would be a sufficient reason for joining a socialist party."He was pretty clear - he disliked capitalism and totalitarianism, and believed in a democratic socialist society in which the people were free. He was a member of the Labor Party, which he criticized for not being truly socialist, and he attacked the USSR as not being socialist but a nightmarish tyranny instead.Honestly, he was to the left of me. I would consider myself a social democrat whereas he was full on red.

Orwell was not a socialist. 

We are losing rights, slowly.

Henry Kissinger and some leaders have been quoted many times addressing what they call a new world order. Bad? We don't need to be like Rome.