Home » Video » ...

Tulane university harvard of the south Videos

Mayan Mayapan pyramid detail - youtube.com/tanvideo11

//youtube.com/tanvideo11 - Mayapan (Màayapáan in Modern Maya), (in Spanish Mayapán) is a Pre-Columbian Maya site a couple of kilometers south of the ...

Game Recap: Women's Water Polo Harvard Mini - Jan. 30, 2016

No. 22 Harvard women's water polo got off to a strong start in its season debut, tallying a pair of 14-goal performances in a 14-4 triumph in the opener against ...

JP Jofre: Sweet Dreams (2011)

JP Jofre (b. 1983) Sweet Dreams (2011) Luke Fleming, Viola JP Jofre, Bandoneon Praised by The Philadelphia Inquirer for his “glowing refinement,” violist Luke ...

Tulane vs USM - NCAA Regionals (1987)

The Tulane Green Wave finished the 1987 regular season by defeating the USM Golden Eagles in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. The Green Wave then participated ...

User Comments

Coach Brockhoff commented on 30 Sep 2006

Sorry for the confusion. The Southern Miss Game was a regular season game (the last series of the season). After that is the NCAA Regionals (vs. LSU and Cal. St. Fullerton).

SouthernMissAlum commented on 29 Sep 2006

Only one comment; this was a regular season game, not a regional game.

LIVESTREAM: MSOC vs. SSA South Chelsea - Aug. 9 - 4 p.m.

Andrew College men's soccer hosts SSA South Chelsea in an exhibition match at Hord Field. Tune in for the pregame at 3:45 p.m..

Tulane 2001 Commencement Address - Marian Wright Edelman

Marian Wright Edelman delivers the 2001 Tulane Univesity Commencement Address May 19, 2001.

User Comments

sbelcher16 commented on 04 Mar 2009

wonderful!!! Thank God for leaders such as Edelman!!!

University of South Carolina embarks on $1 billion capital campaign

University of South Carolina President Harris Pastides and Fluor Corporation CEO David Seaton announce the start of Carolina's Promise, a $1 billion capital ...

Prof John Lennox

"A Matter of Gravity - God, the Universe and Stephen Hawking"

User Comments

DifferentGuy4 commented on 13 Aug 2013

I keep coming across that you don't really search for any evidence, in fact I don't think you even watched this video because of some of the stuff you said. I feel like you listen to some people and then piggy back on that weak defense, but don't look for evidence for it making you (if you didn't) an uninformed voter. So you believe in something that you will never live to see and tell about, something that is highly disputed, something that requires the new atheist definition of faith?Continued

Bevan Jones commented on 12 Aug 2013

The evidence for Jesus is not very strong, there are even histories who dispute whether he even lived. The bible is not an historically accurate document, no matter how much you want to believe it is. Also the if the multi-verse theory is true the fine tuning of the universe is anthropic and not very special. I get tired of telling you that the burden of proof is on the believer, for which you have yet to show anything solid and keep telling me there is no evidence to disprove him which is flawd

BeingMadeNewBy JESUS commented on 21 Mar 2013

1, nothing means what? NOTHING! how can anything be created from Nothing when there's nothing there, unless someone/something GREATER than 'nothing' exists to bring about something out of the 'nothing'! 2. ..Is & Always B.S?...who's B.S now? yu! why? 'cos yor statement is FALSE. 3...'right' according to who/what? what does 'adequately' in reasoning mean? Christianity is the only TRUE religion ACCORDING to the Will of The Almighty God! 4.WRONG. More like "more I undastand, the more I worship God"

Willy T commented on 21 Mar 2013

1. Lawrence Krauss doesn't resolve anything in this instance. 2. His point is that science isn't at war with Christianity which he demonstrates to be true both historically and currently, (only 10% of Nobel-prize winners are atheists) 3. He doesn't need to prove the others wrong if his is right, they are mutually exclusive. 4. No, that's basically not what he's saying. He's saying "it looks like it was created - now lets keep this in mind with regard to the larger context of the presentation'.

Bevan Jones commented on 20 Mar 2013

Just a few points: 1. His notion of 1+1=2... To this, please see Lawrence Krauss work "something from nothing" 2. Famous scientist argument is and has always been bullshit: Google: Top Ten Creationist Arguments - its #6 in the vid 3. I have never seen Prof. Lennox adequately reason why his religion is right and all the other ones are wrong. 4. His argument around 15mins is basically him saying 'It looks like it was created, there for it must have been created' Lessons from Carl Sagen would help

DifferentGuy4 commented on 06 Aug 2013

When you say there is no evidence; you're wrong. You mean no irrefutable evidence, because there is evidence; the only problem is that all the evidence is affected by people's bias or it happened long ago. Either way it is all affected by bias. You see, the truth of the matter is that there is possibility for God; those who proclaim that there is no God, have too many faults in the arguments and really, I find little problems in Lennox' argument, well not enough to prove him untrue. Continued

Bevan Jones commented on 28 Mar 2013

And your comment is exactly what I am talking about. You don't call a Philosopher to build a bridge, you call an engineer. You don't call a businessmen to heal the sick, you call a Doctor. You don't call a doctor to fight a legal case, you call a lawyer. And you don't call a religious nut to do science, you call a Scientist. Sometimes I don't understand what science says, but it is not my place to criticize a theory which 99% of scientists agree on. I would rather try to understand and learn.

BeingMadeNewBy JESUS commented on 25 Mar 2013

Bhuddha was a mere human being. His body still decays in his grave. He is NOT a god but a teacher who taught good things & people who never met him imagined/fantasised him for a god/idol started worshipping him. Allah is a demon spirit (a fallen angel) who has deceived millions, even now. He's already condemned. Hindu gods are ALL demon spirits (fallen angels) & are ALL condemned. No matter what religion anyone is in, IF he/she repents of sin and TURN & BELIEVEin JESUS CHRIST, he'll be SAVED.

Andy McStab commented on 10 Apr 2013

So there is no space for discernment in your world view? And formulating beliefs based on discernment, is unnatural? Why then when your dad told you not to stick your fingers in the plug hole as a toddler, did you obey? Why would you avoid a dodgy looking person loitering in an alley on a dark night, with no evidence of their criminal convictions? Discernment is perfectly logical, it has saved you a thousand times before "proof" ever did, and whats more, it is natural to discern a creator -

ClemJCES commented on 31 Aug 2013

Ignoramuses betray their lack of informed opinion by the way they parrot (inchoately by way) the gossip, rumors, and hearsay which they've picked up via the grapevine. To read three or four books -- all on the same topic -- which show reasoned disagreements between the various authors is utterly beyond their intellectual capacity. The Christian religion's shelf-life is nearly 2,000 years old. No philosophy of man can match this, with but one exception: scepticism, a philosophy of ignorance..

DifferentGuy4 commented on 02 Aug 2013

Now to prove God, first let's start off with the basics and turn the question on it's head. You claim that God has no undeniable evidence, yet is there undeniable evidence against God. I say Substance A is going to explode, but you say it has no evidence; isn't it logical to provide the same evidence you want against it because if you don't, that makes both ideas on the same playing field and it all comes down to a matter of belief. Now let me ask you are a "Truth Lover" or "Religion Hater"?

DifferentGuy4 commented on 07 Aug 2013

That's great, now show me where God doesn't fit in the equation. Because I do not believe in a God of the Gaps because that isn't a logical idea. You see, I don't find that science points away from God like in the case of Zeus or Ra rather it flows and points to God. I believe that Darwin found an amazing process, but I do not believe that it can support all the weight it carries; I believe in evolution, but not that it was the beginning of the universe... Continued respond to the other one.

Andrew Gill commented on 27 Jun 2013

all im saying is god is feasible with not much in the way of evidence these other theories you talk of yes there feasible and alot with some evidence im not a believer im just stating what i see i know there is not much in the way of evidence with it and saying god did it dose not get much justness but being said naiver dose saying only multi-verse theorie there tuns more and i think you will agree with that in mind we have to take them into account so in short we don't know what came tobe

Link for boards:

Link for your site:

Current link: