How to stop al qaeda Videos

doctor of common sense??? you're insulting and ignorant. do you know al qiada is made up????

???????? really

thats the problem.oil sweden buys, terrorists sweden welcomes.

....and everyone in the world knows it.

+Rayan Laguindab Ignoring the fact that this is all fairy-tales, the world or any nation would literally be better off under Satan than Islam, have to go with the lesser evil.

+Beef Chavez"No, I'm not. I'm just contextualizing them in a more accurate manner. The fundamental difference in our views is that you see Islam as uniquely violent or heinous, whereas I see it as not fundamentally different or worse than similar movements and organizations of the time."Is there a Christian State that I'm not aware of? No other religion in the modern day has caused as much destruction, death, and conflict as Islam. That's how it is uniquely violent, to deny that is to deny the reality of how Radical Islam operates."And that's ironic because America did become the global super power, and continually uses its military might to try to force secularism and "democracy" on the rest of the world.You see this is the disconnect in your thinking on this matter."This excuses what the Islamic State is doing to you? You're the one who's disconnected in their thinking. The only counter argument you can bring up is American intervention when countless people have made it clear to you that Islam at it's very core is a religion of violence and conquest. Russia and America's intervention in the middle east did not do anything but provide the spark for the powder keg to blow, but that spark would have been delivered sooner or later."Ironically, I'm the one that's arguing that we need to return to the non-interventionism espoused at America's inception."Cause that worked out so well in WW1 and WW2, right? You do realize that non-intervention at this point is impossible, right? America has indeed dug itself into a hole with this, but forces such as IS would have gotten to us sooner or later. The very purpose of IS is to spread across the world becoming a GLOBAL POWER, not just a super power. That is what seperates American from IS as well.Your arguments are rooted in ignorance, and the refusal to hold Islam accountable for it's core concepts. That is just what the radicals need, for people to sit around and do nothing as they spread and grow more powerful.

"You are now denying the centuries of recorded history in which Islam raped, pillaged, and conquerd for allah."No, I'm not. I'm just contextualizing them in a more accurate manner. The fundamental difference in our views is that you see Islam as uniquely violent or heinous, whereas I see it as not fundamentally different or worse than similar movements and organizations of the time. Case in point:"No, they are trying to make Islam a global power. Why else would they name themselves the Islamic State? Do you honestly think they just want one contry to keep them happy? You deluded fool, they will spread or die trying."And that's ironic because America did become the global super power, and continually uses its military might to try to force secularism and "democracy" on the rest of the world.You see this is the disconnect in your thinking on this matter.Ironically, I'm the one that's arguing that we need to return to the non-interventionism espoused at America's inception.

+Beef Chavez"Islam does talk about conducting warfare, and lays out rules for doing so in a "moral" fashion. This is why it is, rather unfairly, considered a uniquely violent religion. It's also why they favor tactics like suicide bombing."No, Islam is not "unfairly" considered uniquely violent, it IS uniquely violent. All religions have varying degrees, but Islam remains the one that is most acted upon because it's core is still rooted in barbarism."Of course these tactics have been ruinous failures, that turned public opinion in the middle east against radical Islam, that is until America's ruinous failure of attacking Afghanistan and Iraq. American drone strikes are no less needlessly destructive than suicide bombs."The middle east was already in turmoil before American or even Russia came in."The concept of "radical ideology" didn't really exist until around the 1800's, so it's disingenuous to try to suggest that it goes back centuries."You are now denying the centuries of recorded history in which Islam raped, pillaged, and conquerd for allah."They're doing the same thing that the "radical" American revolutionaries did, trying to oust an occupying power. The primary difference is that American revolutionaries did this to establish a secular democracy, whereas radical Muslims want to establish a theocracy specifically because of the way that they have been treated by secular democracies."No, they are trying to make Islam a global power. Why else would they name themselves the Islamic State? Do you honestly think they just want one contry to keep them happy? You deluded fool, they will spread or die trying. It's what their book commands, and what their ancestors did FOR CENTURIES.

Islam is a "radical ideology" in that it was a response to the failure of the non-violent "radical ideology" of Christianity to defeat the Roman empire.They saw the Romans feeding Christians to the lions and Islam was a way of reconciling Christian pacifism with the practical need for self defense.Islam does talk about conducting warfare, and lays out rules for doing so in a "moral" fashion. This is why it is, rather unfairly, considered a uniquely violent religion. It's also why they favor tactics like suicide bombing.Of course these tactics have been ruinous failures, that turned public opinion in the middle east against radical Islam, that is until America's ruinous failure of attacking Afghanistan and Iraq. American drone strikes are no less needlessly destructive than suicide bombs.The concept of "radical ideology" didn't really exist until around the 1800's, so it's disingenuous to try to suggest that it goes back centuries.They're doing the same thing that the "radical" American revolutionaries did, trying to oust an occupying power. The primary difference is that American revolutionaries did this to establish a secular democracy, whereas radical Muslims want to establish a theocracy specifically because of the way that they have been treated by secular democracies.

+Beef Chavez Islam was already radicalized in the century it was established with the Kharijites. Extremism within Islam/radical Islam has existed long before America was discovered. But with that said, America has certainly helped furthering the spread of radical Islam in the Middle East with their nonsensical interventions - even if it has been done unwillingly.

+Beef Chavez No it wasn't you twat, Islam is at it's very core a radical ideology. Those committing extremist acts are actually doing a very god job serving the ideology they follow.

+Simon WatsonIslam was radicalized when Nasser's CIA trained torturers sicked dogs on Sayyid Qtub in his prison cell.

+Beef Chavez There have been radical Islamist elements for hundreds of years, and the modern Islamist issue dates back to the Muslim Brotherhood of the yearly 20th century.

+Irvin Alberto Yer he would really admit to that, like the rest of the world wouldnt turn their backs on america

+jim jam in a press conference Obama stated our forces were training the ISIL forces. look it up from doctor william mount channel.

+Irvin Alberto The fuck do you mean common sense? They FUNDED rebels to get rid of assad, thats no conspiracy theory, but then a group broke off and became ISIS and the funding stopped for a while

Krauthammered doesn't seem to realize that it is the USA's hegemonic presence in the Middle East that causes the hatred. For the same reason he probably doesn't understand why Israel is hated by it's neighbors. His blindness has to be an act.

@herbs814 is that why a recent poll was taken and came to the conclusion that those who watch Fox News are 64% more likely to be misinformed on topics such as the war, health care, and tax reforms?

If Obama did close Guantanamo it would provide illegitimacy to the war in Afghanistan and Iraq he is right about that, because the war in Iraq and Afghanistan is illegitimate.

Although I agree with Charles K on many issues he becomes very biased when it comes to killing Muslims because he's so pro-Israel & anti-Constitution when it comes to that.

Islamofascists will just come up with another excuse to impose their tyranny.

Fox tells more truth than all other tv news channels COMBINED.

'Hammer in 2012!!!