Arkansas university application status Videos

O mufCc

send link pls for new episodes

+Roberta Conway my b-day

+Roberta Conway how u kno that .

Yeah, don't u think they deserve it. Taking in 5 children that aren't there's even though they can't take care of them selves

It's not annoying, it's stories about the environment kids and their parents living in and how they are suffering from pollen, mold, and more. It's about how parents lose their love ones.

+Nesha Britwood but completely agree that they lay it on THICK yo

+Nesha Britwood "sob" stories are definitely about ratings, BUT, when you can feel the human condition for another person, that's really a beautiful thing. Sometimes I need to go to that to remind me of the possibilities, the suffering and the joy of life.

+hgwhatley A lot of them end up selling it or losing their homes actually. Some of them rent the houses out. I would like to see smaller and more energy efficient homes, a family of 4 does not need a gigantic home most of the time--it's a case of just because you can built it, doesn't mean it's best.

+celestialcircledance i was thinking the same thing... like, i know they pay for the house, so there is no payments, but the heating and cooling.... and housing taxes??? that would suck to be given such a gift and have it taken away because of something like that

+celestialcircledance I think that all of it is paid off for. In a lot of episodes you'll hear them say that they don't have to pay their mortgage and that it's all paid off for.

It costs $8.00 to get in, and you can keep all the diamonds (and other minerals) you find.  

Good video

+Andrew Xavier I hear you brother. We are in the minority. Where can I find your article?

+Jose Santiago I wrote an article on this Clinton topic for a website. No one expressed interest. I'm tired of no one giving a damn. But, that's just me. I've written a few pieces, and this one though important has received the least attention.

+Andrew Xavier cool

+fnfal762by39 A little more exposition would be helpful. You might also consider checking your ego, I mean to say you're the only one to keep Pete "legitimate," 'in line', or otherwise is a bit overboard.

+INFOWARSEAST Based on the interview with this Larry guy, he has claimed to hold physical evidence for some or all of the crimes he spoke on. Motive is really secondary to physical evidence (he claims money was his motive). Physical evidence he could have would be something along the lines of those man's testicles he claimed to cut off and soak in formaldehyde circa his first interview (Sept. 2013). It's only a case if he kept those trophies and showed the police exactly where they were at, otherwise his words are just going to be dismissed as a symptom of dementia or PTSD.

+Andrew Xavier true, what should be legal, what is legal and the reality are much different.I don't think it's a case at all, even if you did murder someone they need bodies, motive and evidence.

+INFOWARSEAST It sounds to me that it may be the written or unwritten internal policy of the Arkansas State Police to defer certain cases to the prosecutor, this one included. I don't know precisely the criteria, but I can infer any matter having to do with a former high ranking public official probably foots the bill. One can argue the morals of this, but there is no law that I am aware of that would bar that agency from deferring such a serious allegation to a more prominent official. I know enough about evidence, there is no physical evidence currently in the hands of the police that could prove such a crime (or even provide probable cause for a bench warrant, really), just what would likely be dismissed by any defense attorney as the ravings of an old delusional madman suffering from PTSD and projecting his guilt in fictional ways. As to the law, you probably are right in that characterization, however, practically speaking the case is always "flimsy and weak" when the prosecutor does not wish to prosecute. If the prosecutor's hand was truly forced into bringing charges they could simply file a nolle prosequi or create an error in procedure depending on what might be more politically sound. It's unheard of to me that a prosecutor would face any criminal responsibility for doing such a thing(s) irrespective of what may be written on paper as law. As a matter of my own convictions and principles I believe most localities in the United States to be Rule by Law as opposed to Rule of Law jurisdictions.

fair enough... & exactly ! and not doing his job is a crime in itself..   where's harvey dent when you need em !?

+Andrew Xavier prosecutor discretion is irrelevant, charges do not need to be levied by a prosecutor, but I understand your point. Chances are people are confused about what evidence actually is. And a prosecutor doesn't have the choice or authority to deny a crime, the refusal to prosecute is weighed by evidence. If a prosecutor chooses not to charge someone when a crime is present, that in itself is a crime, I'm not going over federal case law, just look it up, prosecutors don't have discretion unless the case is flimsy and weak, like this case would be.

+INFOWARSEAST Prosecutorial discretion is what they call it to make it legal.

i hope they do so ...im interested in the outcome..& oh they grab lol but not at this level..stop and frisk is only for the common folks.

Your absolutely right ! Any prosecutor that ignored evidence of a crime is themselves violating rules and a misdemeanor offense of obstruction of justice. The way sworn testimony works is not going on a random TalkShow and making a statement rather a written signed affidavit, a verbal confession under oath. And then you need physical evidence and or witnesses to bring charges. It's simple, the law doesn't just run around grabbing people.