China daily oatmeal Videos

+David McNamara This whole piece is pure propaganda.

//www.bbc.com/news/magazine-24528383

This is the most full of garbage and blatant lies interview I've ever seen on the subject. The guy doesn't even look honest when he's spouting all this nonsense.

Check out the website he promotes. Full of quotes taken out of context. Funny because most of the quotes seemingly agree with him but in actuality are from people that believe in real net neutrality and against people like Berin. Most of the quotes against the FCC are because they believe the FCC is in the pocket of the telecom industry but applaud the recent decision of the FCC for (finally) making a decision on behalf of the public.

+InXLsisDeo I agree that the free market is not a magic wand. But it's precisely because some problems are too complicated why you can't attempt to solve them with a one-fits-all solution, as the federal government does.Most problems that the federal government has intended to solve (let's assume in good faith), are problems to which the market just needed a few years to come up with a solution.You can see it all across the board with Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs, which have been proven to hurt the poor instead of helping them, and have basically destroyed the nuclear African American family. But before they were implemented, poverty among blacks was declining almost clockwork by 1% a year, product of the period of never-before-seen wealth of the 1950s.It also happened with Reagan's War on Drugs. See, even Conservatives can get the wrong idea of what government can solve. Hundreds of billions of dollars gone down the drain because of a stupid crusade against the abstract, and nothing to show for it except the largest prison population in the world and the occasional photos of Mexicans being hung on bridges by the drug cartels.And I can concede that most government programs are implemented in good faith. But the problem is that more often than not, the unintended consequences of government-enforced policies are not analysed, so you end up dealing with the problems 30-40 years later, when it's almost too late to do anything. There's not even a debate anymore as to how far government can intrude in our private lives. It's a given, that we're under their mercy. The roles have been reversed. We used to be the rulers, now we're the ruled.Jefferson, again, puts it best: "The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalised version of the first."In the end, Libertarians and Conservatives don't dislike government just because. We dislike government because even though it has the same motivations and pitfalls of the private sector (i.e., greedy people who don't care about you), it doesn't have the same restrictions as the private sector does in the form of market forces like competition, risk, and capital gain. Such forces don't exist in government. The government's income is guaranteed because you can't refuse to pay taxes, therefore there's no incentive not to waste, or to provide a good service (even you can agree that the DMV sucks balls). There's no negotiation in government, even if you disagree with how your dollars are being spent. And, in theory, if you disagree you could elect someone and change things. But in reality that doesn't happen. There's no guarantee the person you elect will do anything. If they don't, the only thing you can do is vote for someone else and hope for the best. The Founding Fathers never intended public office to be the career it's become now. They understood that times change and some laws have to be passed in order for government to adapt, but not at this current rate. Now it's the opposite. You're looked at funny if a day passes and a new bill hasn't been signed into law.The smaller the government, the freer the people, and the less restrictions there are for the people (you know, us, for whom the Founding Fathers created this shit) to do whatever they want. That includes people who do bad things, yes. But the bad apples are the few, not the many. In general, Americans have always been honest, hard-working people. And until this new-found hatred against capitalism came about (perpetuated through government indoctrination, I mean, public schools) America produced the best products and services in the world.If the American people don't get their shit together and elect a president who actually believes in capitalism and the free market, instead of socialists like Obama and Hillary, a president who believes in creating new wealth instead of redistributing the existing wealth, they can kiss the American Republic as they know it goodbye.And, by the way, putting the Internet under Title II was fucking insane. Definitely not a good decision to make. Just read this article by the IEEE (I think we can agree the IEEE is unbiased): //spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/internet/net-neutralitys-technical-troubles

+InXLsisDeo I find it utterly hilarious that you mention water, when such a terrible example can be used against it being done right by government. Namely California. They cause a doubt by preventing market prices from taking effect. Artificially low prices mean people consume more water, wasting it. Then they enact bans on residential use of water, or restrictions therein; when residential use accounts for only 20% of total water consumption.Most is agricultural. It's a huge scam, corruption to the neck. The free market would solve it just fine.Just like it would with the internet. Google Fiber is a simple example of this, but local governments and now even federal governments are dramatically slowing them down. There is no one to blame for lack of competition besides the government. They caused the problems associated with our current environment and like lambs to the slaughter we invited them in as our savior. It's so depressing I can't even adequately put it into words. Telephone standards, like a standard for any other industry, would emerge thanks to competition. When? Who knows. It isn't for you or I to decide that nor can we know what the best system is. No one is smart enough to know that. Centrally planned or influenced economics do not work. And even if they did, they operate under such a vile immorality it isn't even worth entertaining the thought. The choice of classifying ISPs under title II telecommunication public utilities absolutely guarantees there will never be any competition in the market ever again; besides a small bit from google fiber since they already started and are funded by Google, one of the largest companies in the world. Only they can afford to and can even hope to understand all the bullshit regulations they now have to overcome before they can start to deliver a service to customers. 

+UnknownXV What you guys don't seem to understand is free market doesn't solve everything. In particular, when there are large infrastructures that must reach a maximum of people, it simply doesn't work. We are not talking about competing fast food chains here. We are trying not only to efficiently level prices, we are trying to efficiently make a service available to everybody. So if prices is the only variable in the equation, you're solving the wrong problem. And corporations cannot solve that problem alone, this is where the government has to step in. If water wasn't regulated, very large portions of the country would simply not have it because it's not economically interesting, or the prices would be prohibitive. Other example: look at the NY metro map. It's a complete mess with some areas really badly deserved and others with several lines that hardly communicate with each other, because it was operated by private companies that would compete rather than cooperate. The end result was NY hardly had a subway worthy of that name. That is a perfect example where regulation is necessary.For the telecom industry, it is well known that telephone was a complete mess in the US because of the same problem: there were thousands of operators and lines wouldn't communicate from coast to coast. Federal government had to intervene to put some order in that mess.Then in the 1990s before GSM became the accepted standard in the US (long after Europe and the rest of the world), there was a competing standard called CDFA (if i remember well), and GSM phones wouldn't work on CDFA operated areas and vice versa. It was pretty obvious now that cellphones were going to replace land phones that it was the right time to put some order rather than redoing the same mistake of the past.: if telcos weren't ready to cooperate on a single standard, the gvt would impose it. So no, by intervening, the gvt doesn't always create a mess. It does it because it's necessary.Finally, if people could, they would do a major class action against ISPs for illicit arrangements between ISPs, but a class action is hard, long, costly, and you may not win. Especially when you have to prove that kind of thing. The choice of classifying internet under Title II was the right choice to make.

+BucketheadChuck Indeed you replaced your post with a dot. lol

+InXLsisDeo Oh, look who's deleting posts now.

+BucketheadChuck My post didn't really need a confirmation of your fucktardness, but here you go.

.

+BucketheadChuck Oh Milton Friedman that's fucking impressive. Is that all you can come up with ? The guy who called Pinochet's dictatorship a miracle ? You dropped out of school after what, 2 months ? Not that it matters, it was probably one of these schools that propote creationism adn other conservatist nonsense. At least they didn't teach you how to behave like a moron, you obviously learnt that by yourself. Time for dinner, angry baby, your mom is yelling. And don't forget to put your dish in the dishwasher when you're finished.

+InXLsisDeo You sound like a fucking 10 year-old who doesn't know the first thing about free markets. Please do all of us a favor: read some Milton Friedman or shut the fuck up.

+InXLsisDeo Huh?Government created basic public infrastructure has nothing to do with them creating monopolies in non-utility markets. 

+UnknownXV Aaaaah, the glorious free market. Bow before your god: "Free Market akhbar !"It is a well-known fact that free market leads to concentration and end up in monopolies, and that's what happens with most commodities like telecom industry. There have been computer simulations that lead to this conclusion. But you're right, usually it happens after intense lobbying/corruption of the established actors in order to keep the others out. And also of course, the prohibitive cost of entry in order to build the infrastructure.Oftentimes, the first who came were substantially helped by the government. Sometimes, the governement even bears the entire infrastructure construction because noone else can do it. So of course, the government is blamed afterwards for unfair interventionism. Except that the alternative was basically having nothing.

+InXLsisDeo The USA is too large and politically diverse/corrupt to ever work properly. It won't. It doesn't need to either. Free markets are the best possible option. And no, they were not free before this. Even Google has trouble breaking into the ISP industry.GOOGLE. If Google can barely do it, there's not a chance in hell anyone else will. There's no competition because government blocks it, then it comes in to try and "fix" a problem it created, and people bite into it. 

Look at Europe to see why it is a good idea, when it is correctmy implemented.

The good news is it's organic, you can learn more here:fine4.info/natural-eczema-treatment

I will work on it. 

Yes that was the sweet and sour sauce. Remember you can use any sweet and sour sauce if you have anymore questions let me know

Oh one more thing. I also used the five spice only us 1/4 teaspoon of that. 

Before stir frying the tofu. You must drain in over night in a strainer with a bowl underneath. You want to make sure all the water is removed from  the tofu. You can in a bowl season it with garlic powder, salt and black pepper, that's what I did.Then stir fry it like did in the video until it has a brown crisp to it. Stir in the all of your veggies until veggie are slightly tender or the way you like the texture of the veggies Then add you sweet n' sour sauce. How that that helped you. Good luck. 

//www.amazon.com/Jufran-Sweet-Chili-Sauce-11-64/dp/B005NJBNXG