Eleventh doctor summary Videos

Dude don't be an ass hole....

That comment just made my day. Thank you sir.

man

+DarkSun Studios You may be happily surprised at today's video :D (That is all I will say... I shall say no more! Now I'm off!) *flies away*

+kwanarchive Hehe, I like that idea. Depending on the context, I might use that :D

+Jamie Doyle Nice. thanks Jamie!

+PapaKennMediaI REALLY wasn't trying to persuade you not to view this as a negative, trust me! On the contrary in fact, I pointed out somewhere in there that it is so much of a negative that, in this rare case, it isn't necessary to refer to it as "merely" your opinion. Instead I advocate putting it in as more of a final, or objective, judgment.One of the things I like most about you as a reviewer is that you are put emphasis on the idea that, if you see something about an episode of film or whatever as being bad, you see it as being your opinion instead of undeniable fact. In other words, viewers may always disagree.The difference here is that, if someone were to disagree with it being bad, they are probably at least somewhat sexist or possibly weren't really paying careful attention. The last of which is not really a thing I'd hold against them, mind you. The idea that you just sit back and relax when watching Television is something that is very understandable; relaxing is even one of the prime reasons lots of people even watch Television. But back to the point at hand: while most positives and negatives are, indeed, strictly a matter of your or my or someone else's personal opinion, I say that in this 1 special case, it's more than that.The rest (and the majority) was merely pointing out how this abomination came to be. I was doing this because there seems to be a lot of confusion amongst the fandom about that. So I thought I'd clear things up, is all.Context can often help putting things in their proper light. It's still going to be a decidedly negative light, this should be obvious; but even if it's negative, there is still (often) more than one shade of negative light.

+Ahsim Nreiziev I know what scene you're talking about, and I'll reserve my judgment for tomorrow's video. I'm going to be completely honest though... the lengthy explanation really isn't necessary. I understand these things and know that a head writer doesn't always have control over everything unless they assert themselves in such a manner. With few exceptions though, this is unlikely to sway my opinion of things that annoy me or things I enjoy. If something annoys me, it annoys me. Simple as that. :)

+Ahsim Nreiziev Oh god, now you've reminded me. Damn it. I really like the rest of the episode, as well.

+Ahsim Nreiziev Anyways....Here's the point. The next episode on the list, The Crimson Horror, was written by Mark Gatiss. As can be surmised by the above, this means that Steven Moffat is contractually allowed, and even expected, not to do his job as Showrunner on this one. If something were to be removed from the final edit, that's up to the Director and possibly Gatiss himself.So, there's this moment in The Crimson Horror. Let's be clear: it shouldn't have happened. This is of such an objective truth that I would even understand, and in fact also encourage, to not put it in the "Annoyances" but create a special "(Objective) Weakness" category for it, since Annoyances are explicitly personal / subjective.OK: a few important things you need to know when reviewing the Episode: it wasn't in the script as written by Gatiss. Matt Smith wanted it in, he suggested it and the director agreed. The reasons Smith wanted it in are blatantly obvious when you think about it. Which says something about at least one aspect of his character, and it ain't good (duh!).He's a fantastic Actor, and his Eleventh Doctor is an absolute joy of a Character, but we now know he has at least one major flaw. I personally think people are too complex to immediately say he is a horrible person, but that doesn't mean I think this can be excused on his part.In conclusion: you can't blame Moffat for not removing this from the Episode, because it was a Gatiss one and Moffat doesn't involve himself in the usual manner with those. You can't really blame Gatiss since he didn't write the "thing". If you want to blame someone, blame Matt Smith.PS: If one finds themselves able to ignore that one event, I find the episode to be actually really rather good. I'd give it an 8 (out of 10) I think, because I flat-out refuse to let a single moment of a few seconds that didn't really have any impact on the rest of the plot ruin an Episode for me. If I would take it into consideration, I'd estimate it to be more along the lines of a 4.5

+stalchild15 Unless that show is a movie. And that movie is called "The Room". :) lol

+PapaKennMedia I personally love the Eye of Harmony. Maybe it is just me, but I love learning about the inner workings of the TARDIS. The Eye also was part of the 1996 movie, so maybe that is why I brought it up. And the circle is completed!

+Whovian305 formly TigerBlood13 Hmm... I dunno... I was about to click that "Skip" button.... X-D ;)

+HARVEE64 Honestly, the Eye Of Harmony didn't leave that big of an impression on me. Maybe I'm just a weirdo :)I will be watching Night of the Doctor! :) Regardless of whether the references go over my head or not. Haha

+Whovian305 formly TigerBlood13 I agree that it is important, I just don't think that it is 100% necessary. But he should DEFINITELY watch it!

Night of the Doctor is very important! True I suppose it would mean more to us who have seen the 1996 movie, but it still holds important info. It's only 7 minutes long, Papa Kenn don't you dare skip it!!

She is yeah

+NathanWho Uh... 1. What is the problem with my logo? 2. What does that have to do with what I'm saying?

+dante minutillo look at your logo and then shut your face

That the problem im telling him in every single trailer he makes

+Jim Jones Thanks, Glad you think so!

+Gallifreyforever97 I thought it was fantastic

+dante minutillo Oh ok fair enough, will keep that on board for next time

Oh wow that's a big statement lol Thank You!

+RealGaming Thank You!

+GG PRODUCTIONS Oh brilliant! Thank You!

+Gallifreyforever97 i just love it...i have watched it about 10 times!

+NathanWho Productions Oh wow really? Thank You! haha

i would recommend watch the episode Blink in season 3 of the new season. this will get you a sense of dr who. if you like it after that episode then go back to the relaunch of the series the first episode of the whole series is called Rose

+Rachel Stump maybe,,,I'll try what Jinn said first since its series 1, but if I can't get into a bit after that point I'll try your suggestion :]

Start with the ninth doctor (that's when they revived the series)

+Jinn bs ok thanks :]

+TheMultiGamer4Doctor Who Series 1 Episode 1. It's name is "Rose"

+Jinn bs hmmmm so what should I look up? Dr Who 2005 episode 1?

+TheMultiGamer4 I would recommend to start with the relaunch from 2005.

LIEZ

Peter Capaldi is the worst doctor in my opinion and the Tom Baker and Matt Smith are the best

+CursedTrinz Me too

+Sandra de Vries I'd watch it

+CursedTrinz At the same speed, such a video would be around 70 minutes long...

+CursedTrinz The real challange would be finding time to upload an video that long.

+Tyler Buikema It was nowhere nearly as bad as season 9 is. 12th doctor is less like the doctor and more like a grumpy old man.

Season 26 did happen... think you might've meant season 27...?