Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?
Milwaukee county parking enforcement Videos
- 1. Milwaukee Residents Try To Find Parking Off Streets
- 2. Parking garage collapse news conference
- 3. Law enforcement announce huge round-up of gang members in Milwaukee
- 4. Photo catches parking checker parked in handicapped spot
- 5. Nearly two dozen gang members busted in Milwaukee
- 6. Lake County Metro Enforcement Group Employees Fail
Milwaukee Residents Try To Find Parking Off Streets
Parking enforcement said officers with tow trucks will remove any vehicle parked on main streets and thoroughfares with "Snow Route Tow Away Zones" and "4 ...
parking garage collapse news conference
Milwaukee County officials hold a press conference on Friday, June 25, 2010, to provide information on the O'Donnell Park parking garage partial collapse.
Law enforcement announce huge round-up of gang members in Milwaukee
12 News Christina Palladino reports Subscribe to WISN on YouTube for more: //bit.ly/1emE5YX Get more Milwaukee news: //www.wisn.com/ Like us: ...
Photo catches parking checker parked in handicapped spot
12 News Nick Bohr reports Subscribe to WISN on YouTube for more: //bit.ly/1emE5YX Get more Milwaukee news: //www.wisn.com/ Like us: ...
User Comments
Adam Guymon
commented
on 26 Sep 2015
2:40 Lets put it this way if a person gets a 30000 dollar fine for parking
there the ticket for the employee should be a minim of 1,500-3,000.00 for
parking there and because he/she is trained and should be an example they
need to be held to higher standards.
Nearly two dozen gang members busted in Milwaukee
Almost two dozen gang members were busted in Milwaukee. The investigation has been going on for months.
User Comments
ItZzAqua HD
commented
on 16 May 2015
Duck the police
ItZzAqua HD
commented
on 16 May 2015
Fuck the police
Lake County Metro Enforcement Group Employees Fail
On Friday, Sept. 14th, 2012 some individuals employed at the Lake County Metropolitan Enforcement Group raided a house owned by Paul Brown. This is yet ...
User Comments
Nikola Tesla
commented
on 27 Jan 2015
These fucks did the same thing to me at my house in 1999.
They tore my house inside out, all they found was .003 grams of weed
(scrapings off of a table and mostly seeds) and threw me in Lake County
Jail for 2 weeks with a $50,000 bond.. They claimed I was a huge coke
dealer and massive pot dealer (when I was a merely a teenager that smoked a
little pot).
Of course all charges were dropped yet these MEG fucks were never held
responsible.
Oh and of course they were high-fiveing one another while finding nothing
and tearing my house apart...
Several years later when living in Gurnee they raided my neighbors
apartment blowing a hole in the door, of course they found nothing then.
In both cases they had ZERO probably cause beyond an unreliable snitch.
Bainshie
commented
on 26 Nov 2012
Yea they are, along with your phone, credit card, and every other company
in your country that is legally obligated to aid the police IF (and only
if) they have the proper paperwork, paper work which is only obtained if
the independent courts agree that there is proper evidence for guilt. (For
instance, you know, a package that is known to be full of drugs is being
sent to your house). The police don't always do this, but in this case they
seemingly followed both the spirit and letter of the law
triptiphan1
commented
on 27 Sep 2012
Always gotta remember, all cops are not bad. You show all the bad, and
stupid things that some cops do. What about the guys that die in the line
of duty. People actually protecting people. You seem crazy things in this
line of work, and each instance makes you look at situations differently.
We all wanna go home at the end of the night. To our kids, wives and
family. Thats our end goal. Not to mess up someones day, or screw them
over. To do our job safely and in the best interest of the public.
Bainshie
commented
on 28 Nov 2012
While in hindsight, due to the police being unable to find anything, it
probably was just a innocent error. You can't argue however that a guy
accepting a package known to contain drugs isn't reasonable doubt. Innocent
before proven guilty, however a investigation requires less proven guilt
then a conviction. If you had to prove 100% that a person was guilty before
the start of an investigation, there never would be any solved crimes.
(Very few, if no arrests are done on that kind of evidence.)
David Bruce
commented
on 23 Sep 2012
Holy crap! I live near there! I used to live in that county! I'm involved
in a case right now where a cop was abusive to me and when I went to the
court, l told the judge it will be very easy to show l was in the right
against the abusive Cook county sheriff if they would view the dash cam. l
was told by the judge there is no dash cam video. I'm like, "What?" That
was it. Cop's word against mine, even though I told the judge l have no
problem trying my case if they will show the dash video.
Bainshie
commented
on 20 Oct 2012
Then expecting the police to give up information about a ongoing
investigation (Into two aspects, why did the Browns have the package, and
who was it originally intended for if not them?) is as retarded as it gets,
considering making such information public could destroy a later arrest.
Throw in your advocation for vigilante justice against the people on the
lower rung of this investigation, and the willingness to blindly believe
only one side of the story, and you come across as a idiot.
Bainshie
commented
on 26 Nov 2012
The package had some kind of drugs in it. Regardless of your stance on
drugs, it's the police's job to uphold the law, not your personal ethical
point of view. Where to go? The package had an address on it. When, that's
also simple. When the guy picked the package up. Remember the article said
that they had a search warrant. There are plenty of times that the police
will overstep their boundaries and do illegal stuff, for better or for
worse. This doesn't seem to be one of these times.
Bainshie
commented
on 19 Oct 2012
God this channel just gets stupider and stupider the more videos I watch.
For starters, a member of the household accepted a package that was
presumably known to contain illegal goods. Regardless of your views on
drugs laws, to suggest that any search warrants granted in this case is
illegal is just retarded. The fact that the package was allegedly
mistakenly taken makes no difference in the sense that the courts and
badges had enough evidence to justify the search and investigation.
triptiphan1
commented
on 27 Sep 2012
Thats why you get cops that make mistakes. And as far as accountablity,
EVERYONE is accountable for what they do. Officers are the bottom rung.
Shit rolls downhill. Ive been blamed for something a superioir ORDERED me
to do. Sometimes these are people that have never been an officer and have
no idea the effect that some of there orders are going to have. I truly
think your heart is in the right place, but your eyes are focused in the
wrong area. Legislation is the beggining of it al.
triptiphan1
commented
on 27 Sep 2012
Just came accross your site today. I like that there is a group that is
actually that passionate about something to go through all of this to make
a stand. Nicely done. I think its always typical though to see the one side
of a story to make the other look bad. Law enforcement have it rougher than
you think. Majorety of cops get into this for the right reasons. But doing
this job for a prolonged amount of time will have an effect on a person.
Not all people can deal with that well.
Bainshie
commented
on 26 Nov 2012
What law was broken here? They had a search warrant, and the suspect had a
package full of drugs. While it might have been an innocent mistake, you
can't suggest that they didn't have reasonable doubt to start an
investigation, which the courts agreed with. Are there times where the
police overstep their boundaries and do illegal shit? Yes. Is there a need
to hi-light this abuse of powers so the public can hold those who work for
them accountable. Yes. Is this channel that? No.
triptiphan1
commented
on 25 Feb 2013
It happens. Believe me. You wont hear about that though because Cops cant
be victims. Media wont show that. There is bad in the world. A percentage
of civilians do fucked up things, and a percentage of cops do bad things.
That percentage is about equal. And as far as cops telling on cops, Ive
seen it happen. Most cops aren't going to put their pension or their
freedom on the line because another cop acts like a dick. Once again, you
wont there that story on the news.
triptiphan1
commented
on 25 Feb 2013
Im not ignoring the fact that these things do sometimes happen. Those
chickenshit offences are the law. Thats what cops are supposed to do,
enforce it. You forget about the scumbags that attack cops. Is that fair? A
cop responds somewhere because of a guy beating his wife, so he stops him
from beating her by taking him to the ground and putting him in restraints.
Then the neighbors cry excessive force. or the beaten wife comes back at
the cop and stabs him. WTF?
Concerned Citizen
commented
on 21 Sep 2012
no, you never said he was guilty; however, the implication is very clear..
"the step son did the smart thing." I'm not stating he did or 'did not' do
anything. At this point, the "facts" have NOT supported 'he did anything'
illegal. Without knowing either of the people involved, you simply CANNOT
imply 'he did' anything. So... can you now argue that you did NOT imply the
step son was guilty. I'm not trying to harass you here; simply trying to
keep an open mind--
Bainshie
commented
on 26 Nov 2012
There are a variety of reasons they may know about the package. For
instance they busted a drug lord, and found a list of packages that have
been sent out. The arrest warrant would have been issued around the time
they found the package and its intended location. However it would have
only become valid after one of the occupants of the house accepted it. The
name on the package doesn't matter (I know if I was buying drugs I wouldn't
order under my actual name.)
R Boyd
commented
on 27 Nov 2012
Uh huh. O.K. So your saying that this guy knew the drugs were being
delivered to his house, and just left the item where everyone that would
come through the door could see it? Makes NO damn sense to me. Has this guy
had packages sent to this address before? Because by the looks of the
neighbor hood and surrounding homes, it looks to be an upper class area.
Not a drug infested hood where everyone deals drugs. Still not buying your
story. Sorry guy.
R Boyd
commented
on 26 Nov 2012
HELLOOO!!! THATS NOT WHAT I ASKED. HOW DID THEY KNOW WHAT WAS IN THE
PACKAGE BEFORE IT WAS DELIVERED? WERE THEY PSYCHIC? WHO TOLD THEM THERE
WERE DRUGS IN IT? AND HOW DID THEY GET THE WARRANT SO FAST? BECAUSE AS WE
ALL KNOW, WARRANTS DO NOT GROW ON TREES. AND THE PERSON TO WHOM THE PACKAGE
WAS INTENDED FOR DIDN'T EVEN LIVE THERE. HENCE THE REASON IT WAS STILL
LOCATED IN THE FOYER OF THE HOUSE WHEN THE COPS CAME IN 10 MINUTES LATER.
R Boyd
commented
on 28 Nov 2012
Well, I still don't think he had anything to do with it. According to his
testimony, he was in the basement. And only when he heard the commotion
going on upstairs did he come up to see what was going on. And depending on
how old the son was who signed for it, as to the relativity of the son
actually looking at the name on it, before he signed for it. As we know,
there are no age restrictions on signing for a delivered package.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Already have an account? Sign in to comment