Ferrari f1 nxs Videos

+rap game bob barker No, he wasn't. He was messing around because he knew the ferrari had no chance on that circuit. He could have driven a lot faster if he was being serious.

+Blehtubezz Aus So you're starting to show excuses? Who is "clutching at straws" now? Power out put and brake size doesn't affect your performance until you tune the chassis. The Ferrari have much better brake, it got 310mm f 300mm r brake router vs 298 f 300 or something rear in NSX but that doesn't matter to you because all you know is the vertical movement of a damper....... Oh if you have a look at Suzuka, the NSX R was just .61 second ahead the even lighter 1280 kg type S..... Learn before you talk.

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 R34 Z TUNE "Try 360 CS. Or even 355, it will ass rape your NSX for damn sure."Yeah, so now you are just blatantly lying, trying to  put words in my mouth and talking about 1950's pick up truck technology for whatever reason.Oh yeah cause brake size or power output matters when talking about modifications, oh wait no... it doesn't "0.44 second faster than NSX 3.2 on Silverstone Southern Loop,"Oh so you mean a NSX with crappy soft spongy suspension still laps within a few tenths of a second of a 355, one might think the real contributing factor of cornering speeds is Tyres and Curb weight, funny that. 

+Blehtubezz Aus First of all, we're talking about Testarossa but if you like to talk about F355 fine,. Do you not understand caster and camber? The front caster of F355 is 7.0 degrees, NSX R 8.0 degrees. This means the NSX R have better more stable steering than the F355. And I guess you don't know what pivot bar is. Anyway, don't talk like the 355 is slower than NSX R.The F355 have a faster lap time than NSX R on Best motoring oval by 6.5 seconds,0.53 second faster on Fuji,3.08 seconds faster on Jarama,0.44 second faster than NSX 3.2 on Silverstone Southern Loop,  0.83 second faster than NSX R on Suzuka0.4 second faster than NSX R on Tsukuba2.28 seconds faster than Type S zero on Twin RingHow about that? You think I am looking for excuse? I don't think I need any.My point is F355 have less chassis work than NSX but the 355 have a larger brakes and more power. It means the F355 have way more potential than NSX. NSX R is at the limit while F355 is cruising by.

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 R34 Z TUNE Should? you already are,1. You're delusional if you think something like a 355 is setup for comfort, its a sports car not a grand tourer or a luxury barge.  2. Right, so what are the factory wheel alignment specs? because they're pretty close to being identical.3. Stiffness of ball joint? If you have any significant play in a ball joint it is defective and needs to be replaced, at least figure out the difference of a rubber bushing and a ball joint. Clutching at straws trying to justify a less powerful car lapping just as fast as your famed Ferrari, some ass raping. 

+Blehtubezz Aus Why should I?

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 R34 Z TUNE clutching at straws aren't you, 

+Blehtubezz Aus 1) Active damper doesn't mean faster, and the point is its settings is bias towards ride quality more than handling. In other word, it tries to maintain the most comfort instead of handling.2) the camber angle and caster angle aren't track purposed.3) My definition of soft is the stiffness of ball joint between upper arm and pivot bar is too soft allowing the camber to change during steering. Not purely the damping.

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 R34 Z TUNE Active Adjustable Damping, meaning it adjusts itself accordingly as you drive.

+Blehtubezz Aus Adjustable damping doesn't mean it's a F1 focused car ok? And yes the damper is adjustabe but did they adjust it? No. The McLaren MP4-12C got a damper that ride as smooth as a BMW 5 series does it mean it's a sedan? Also facts? I don't think you're smart enough here.

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 R34 Z TUNE Continuing with the strawmanning i see, here i'll insert my own, the 355 has active adjustable damping so its a F1 focused car vs a streetcar, see what i did there?(i highly doubt you will understand that)You are aware Ferrari classes it as a sports car, so i guess its just your opinion vs fact.

+Blehtubezz Aus engine mount doesn't define classification, chassis setting does. The 355 is set in comfort instead of track focused. The NSX doesn't keepup with the 360 CS. What kills the Ferrari is R34 Z tune. The only thing Honda did right is competing based model Ferrari with Type R. If you don't believe,go check the chassis setting between type S and type R

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 R34 Z TUNE You can't be serious, an Aston Martin is a "Grand Tourer" not a mid engined sports car, there is a considerable difference. So it's faster around twin ring, how is that any different from Suzuka? clearly you are missing the point of a considerably less powerful car keeping up with the 355 and the track focused 360 CS within tenths on a second on Twin Ring. Obviously Honda did something right with the NSX.

+Blehtubezz Aus Not all. Ferrari 360 CS is a GT with track setting, Ferrari F40, F50 aren't GT and to be honest, F355 is faster than NSX-R on twin ring

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 R34 Z TUNElol is everything ferrari has ever produced a grand tourer. the fact remains, down 70hp per ton and still laps suzuka within a second.

Type R is track ready. F355 is a Berlinetta which more like a GT car. Also, the 355 weight at least 50 kg more than the NSX R. I don't think a car with rack focused setting hang with a car in standard setting or comfort setting known as impressive. 

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 R34 Z TUNE  Ferrari 355 (375bhp) lapped Suzuka 2.33Honda NSX-R (270bhp) lapped Suzuka 2.34 (1990's version)NSX keeping up despite being down 100hp

................... better?

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 Still you're everywhere arguing about cars like it's freaking politics. It's not healthy bru ;P

+Adam Norell Why don't you clam down? I wasn't serious on "ass rape"

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 "Ass rape"? dude, calm the fuck down. Every time you comment on a video you sound like an angry preteen.

+Zang420 Yes, I love the 355

+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 355 is excellent!

+xconditioner OK you made a number of fair points there. I stand corrected.

+Snakebloke The VW is an development-car from the VW research and development plant in Braunschweig (BS-numberplate). You can see an additional antenna at the passengerwindow for telemetry, 2 devices hangig at the mirrors (maybe cameras for lane detection?) and a monitor/laptop on the passenger seat.BTW: it's called tourist drive, not race drive! Unless it's a trackday, it is even not officially allowed to "race" the Nordschleife. So everbody can drive there and is welcome. Always respect each other! And even with an Golf or Ford Focus it's fun to drive, because it's just a beautiful road. And: it's way more challenging to drive a "slow" car fast, than take an high powered BMW M3 or Porsche 911 and just rumble badly through the corners and just go faster than the others because of the sheer power...

+drwarcloud Yeah and you can put anything you want into your mouth; doesn't mean you should...

+Snakebloke Whats your point? You can drive whatever you want on the Nürburgring.

+Cesar Estrada Fool. Accura is HONDA

Are you retarded?

Is that supposed to be funny?

+Cesar Estrada Honda NSX. Acura is the brand for luxury Hondas in the U.S., marketing shit.

That "minivan" is faster than any car you'll ever own.

1:14, looks like a minivan... is a minivan. I DONT CARE WHAT YOU SAY YOU MONSTER

There is no minivan in this video you fucking fuckity fuck fuckIt's an SUV/big family car, BMW X5

+masterpd85 the reason why he wheel spins car at start is to warm up tires notto show off.

El NSX antiguo siempre será maravilloso amigo. Para mi el deportivo japones mas bonito. Senna hizo un gran trabajo con este coche en todos los aspectos

White socks oh cmon?!

The back of his jacket does say, 'BOSS.'

I want to make fake accounts just to be able to like your comment multiple times

actuall it was a stock bov...

Yes it goes on the line from the turbo into the waste gate. I just did it literally 30 minutes ago.

@leatherneckal22 i agree. This car was totally ahead of its time. But now a days I am not feeling i as much anymore due to modern cars that look just as good if not better. But this is still a classic to own and I'd pick one up if i had the cash.

nitrous gauges, supercharger, awesome handling, and its an nsx and modded. WHAT MORE CAN YOU WANT BESIDES A BMW M3 E46 Or E39 M5 Or VW R32.

@RamboCambo253 I think adding 100bhp naturally aspirated would've far exceeded the price of a supercharger. just a guess though

i prefer these headlights over their newer one. Ooo acura is finally coming out the new super car mayb nsx successor. ^^

@Kuriousgorge87 should've gone n/a. Im pretty sure you can reach near if not at 390bhp.

@RamboCambo253 Yeah i would have gone N/a with some ITB's and a sequential gearbox =)

That kit is hideous and is better suited on a FAIL motivational poster.....

It still blows my mind that this car is from 1991!!!

Hey whats better then an NSX? The Eagles of course!

why not just twin turbo it :D nice car regardless.

@RamboCambo253 reliability reasons im guessing

You won't say that after you see the 2012 nsx

its finally starting to get dated :(

hmmmm that shifter can get lucky...

You can't hide those lying eyes!

Man, these cars were so sick!