Enter your query, example: how not cry when slicing onion or how to enter an Free Italian Sex Webcams?
- Georgia perimeter college medical assisting program
- Georgia perimeter college center for disability services
- Georgia perimeter college creative license
- Georgia perimeter college current students
- Georgia perimeter college native plant sale
- Georgia perimeter college on memorial drive
- Ebay iphone 4 flip cover
Georgia perimeter college act requirements Videos
- 1. A Boss's Fate
- 2. Educating NephilimFree - Part 2
- 3. GPC Presents Sealed for Freshness
- 4. Lungs
- 5. Cat on a Hot Tin Roof Rehearal (Halloween Edition)
- 6. "Zampa: Overture"
- 7. Congressman Barrow on H.R. 1319, the Informed P2P User Act
- 8. HESI Math Day 3, p4 - Basic Multiplication - Online Prep Tutor TEAS, GRE, GMAT, SAT, ACT, TOEFL
- 9. ACT Questions and Answers 2015 PDF Files
A Boss's Fate
A case of a serial killer has just been solve just in time for the investigator Charles to save his partner. Or so it seems, it is actually a thought of how everything ...
Educating NephilimFree - Part 2
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY. I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well ...
User Comments
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 03 Sep 2010
@Juxtaroberto He most likely got his information from National Geographic.
The problem with sources like NG is that they are populist sources and not
actual peer reviewed papers, so they can be sensationalist at times. The
actual paper on this subject states that the equivalent is at least the
volume of the Arctic Ocean, which is roughly 2%. He is right though that
the molecular structure of the water has been integrated into the structure
of the mantle itself, and isn't simply "trapped" in it.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 02 Sep 2009
"instead of providing any evidence for evolutionism." So Plate Tectonics is
Evolutionism is it? What about Atomic Theory? That Evolutionism too? Maybe
Cell Theory is Evolutionism! Or maybe GRAVITY? No? How about Cosmological
Physics! Maybe THAT is Evolutionism? Hmm... And if you're looking for
evidence for ALL OF THESE FIELDS, I recommend you begin by visiting your
local library and starting there. Far more intelligent people than I began
investigating these fields long before I was ever born.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 15 Apr 2010
@doctorh2005 "Again, you are assuming the Scientific Method is accurate
enough in the first place even TO TEST conclusions" Are you blind? If
someone, after extensive testing, concludes that electrons travel in a
given direction, then has thousands of his colleagues test this for
themselves, and THEY come to the same conclusion, THEN from this discovery,
they develop something called the Integrated Circuit, now used in all
consumer electronics, that's evidence enough that the method WORKS.
younhol00
commented
on 02 Sep 2009
Mr. evolutionists you need to realize that those that put forth words like
projection, non sequitor, quote mine, and so on only account for 1 to 2
percent of the worlds population. Who in their right mind will take you at
your word when all you've done in your videos is attack the character of
the individual instead of providing any evidence for evolutionism. But you
didn't do that Mr. evolutionists. All you've done is provide assertion
after another that's already been shot by evolutionists.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 03 Sep 2009
"No Plate Tectonics is not evolutionism," Wow... You're actually right
about something for once. So in that case, maybe you can go tell your buddy
NephilimFree to stop claiming that Plate Tectonics is an Evolutionist
Geological discipline? "No one has observe it," We can observe the EFFECTS
of things. That's a part of Science you know... No, you don't know. That's
clear. You also can't see Gravity. Going to claim that it's never been
observed too? By your "logic", Gravity is just conjecture.
younhol00
commented
on 03 Sep 2009
Oh I read the article did you? You provided no rebuttals, all you pointed
out was projection, red herring, nonsequitor, and so on. Hey I get those
excuses ok but I also got the many assertions only backed by assertions. If
you want other people to see the other side of the coin why don't you also
encourage them to see the videos Neph made. Well I am pretty sure some of
them watch them but like you they got emotional and twisted the information
that destroys their stupidism, Oh evolutionism.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 15 May 2010
@vesperus1981 Go to the USGS site. They detail the total volume of water on
the planet. And you've heard a misrepresentation of Science. As I stated in
follow-up response videos, the equivalent water found that is part of the
physical structure of the Mantle of the Earth is equivalent to an Arctic
Ocean's worth of water. That's about 2% MAXIMUM of the water currently on
the surface of the planet. There is only enough water to flood localised
regions, NOT enough to flood the whole planet.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 19 Sep 2009
"Your argument is that because we can't prove there's enough water, there
was no flood." No, my argument is because, A: there's insufficient water,
B: the geological layers do not match, C: the fossils are not scattered as
they would be in a cataclysmic event, D: there's no evidence that flood
sediments formed rapidly all over the planet, E: the existence of numerous
structures built BEFORE the flood still exist where they SHOULDN'T, then
that's evidence AGAINST a flood, hence, no flood.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 15 Apr 2010
@doctorh2005 "what scientific principle do you use to measure the actual
TRUSTWORTHINESS of the scientific method?? *CIRCULAR REASONING ALERT*" Fuck
me... That's just too childish to bother... ALMOST. But I'll tell you how
we measure the trustworthiness of the Scientific method... WE USE IT, AND
WE SEE HOW RELIABLE OUR CONCLUSIONS ARE. The more we discover, the more we
refine our understanding, and the more reliable our ability to measure and
test becomes. You have just failed dismally.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 02 Sep 2009
"Mr. evolutionists you need to realize that those that put forth words like
projection, non sequitor, quote mine, and so on only account for 1 to 2
percent of the worlds population." Oh dear... It doesn't matter how many
people KNOW about the existence of those particular fallacies, THEY DO
EXIST, AND YOU'VE DEMONSTRATED THEM. When people project, like you're doing
in this very post, it gets pointed out. And by the way, the name of the
fallacy you just used is an Appeal to the Majority.
younhol00
commented
on 03 Sep 2009
"Anyone with a fully functional brain" No that's code for anyone heads
stuck in the toilet of evolutionism, I thought to clear that out. No all
you did is attack Nephilim free with your excuses and assertions who by the
way are already destroy by evo scientists, and by DNA, and all the
experiments carried out in the last 70 yrs. I know you will claim otherwise
but don't bother I want to know both sides of the coin, I don't want to
just know evolutionism and ignore other possibilities.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 02 Sep 2009
"What are you talking about the article provide enough information and it
destroyed your ridiculous assertions that there isn't." Clearly you haven't
actually read the article have you? Anyway, since I've already debunked
your ridiculous ramblings in my responses and in the NephilimFree Revisited
CNS episode, I won't be dealing with them again here. My "worldview" has
nothing to do with the scientific rebuttals presented in these videos. And
the name of THAT fallacy is a Red Herring.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 19 Sep 2009
"Argument from silence comes from declaring to be right due to a lack of
contrary evidence." That's not a valid logical fallacy. IF there is no
contrary evidence, then it is reasonable to accept a claim based on the
evidence in support of it. "The peer reviewed paper asserts there is "at
least," not "about," an Arctic Ocean's worth of water subducted into the
mantle." So that's justification for inflating that figure by several
THOUSAND orders of magnitude is it? Sorry, but it's not.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 02 Sep 2009
"Keep in mind that the article did not come from a creationists website but
from a secular institutions. " I'm well aware of that but what YOU are not
aware of is that your article in no way shape or form supports the
Creationist bullshit you keep spouting. As I said before, had you ACTUALLY
WATCHED THE VIDEOS I PRESENTED, YOU WOULD KNOW THAT THIS ARGUMENT HAS
ALREADY BEEN ADDRESSED AND COMPLETELY OBLITERATED BY SCIENCE AND REASONED
LOGIC. Do you know how big the Arctic Ocean is? ...
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 02 Sep 2009
I'll tell you... It's less than 2% of the surface oceans on the planet. You
think an extra 2% is enough to flood above Mount Everest do you? And before
you start your nonsense about mountains being flatter, THAT ONE HAS BEEN
OBLITERATED TOO. Do you know how much kinetic energy gets released as heat
with continents moving at 60mm a year? Enough to heat the stone materials
of the Earth to beyond the melting point of rock. Any faster, it would
scorch the crust. Learn something please.
No To Pseudoscience
commented
on 15 Apr 2010
@doctorh2005 "You keep insisting that "science" is the only way to find
forensic truth." Correction. It is the best available method for
determining observational reality, but let's see what bullshit you're about
to come up with now, shall we? "Actually, there are many other ways of
finding truth - such as archeology-" Archaeology is a SCIENTIFIC
DISCIPLINE. Wow, you failed already. "personal testimony-" Is ONLY valid
when backed up with something observable AND verifiable.
GPC Presents Sealed for Freshness
Call it the 1960s Desperate Housewives version of a Tupperware party gone awry! Georgia Perimeter College and the Theatre Arts Guild present the ...
Lungs
An inside look on the daily lives of smokers from different backgrounds and the fatal consequences that 1st & 2nd hand smoke has had on their lives. Created by ...
Cat on a Hot Tin Roof Rehearal (Halloween Edition)
The students at Georgia Perimeter College in Dunwoody, GA, are rehearsing for Tennessee WIlilams' "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof", as directed by Daniel Guyton.
"Zampa: Overture"
Dekalb Youth Symphony Fall Performance at Georgia Perimeter College.
Congressman Barrow on H.R. 1319, the Informed P2P User Act
On November 8, 2009, Congressman John Barrow (GA-12) spoke on the House floor in favor of H.R. 1319, the "Informed P2P User Act," sponsored by ...
HESI Math Day 3, p4 - Basic Multiplication - Online Prep Tutor TEAS, GRE, GMAT, SAT, ACT, TOEFL
GRE, GMAT, TEAS, SAT, ACT, TOEFL and IELTS Test Prep Private Tutor Online One-to-one Help Skype ID = Keshwani.Prep 1-800-808-PREP ...
ACT Questions and Answers 2015 PDF Files
ACT Questions and Answers 2015 PDF Files Website: //actanswers2015.blogspot.com/ ACT Questions and Answers 2015 PDF Files ACT Questions and ...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on fsaved.com.
Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Already have an account? Sign in to comment