How to vomit twitter Videos

Yeah

Probably

wut?

Thank you! It literally took 10 hours.

+skippy62able Yeah, I usually do when I'm in the hot pain zone haha. Thanks for stopping by dude :)

+Sean Vermillion they were not cold, i believe when he drank them? I wish to find out if they were or not. I bottle conditioned but getting them nice and cold would have helped or eliminated the over bubbles.

+Sean Vermillion they were not cold, i believe when he drank them? I wish to find out if they were or not. I bottle conditioned but getting them nice and cold would have helped or eliminated the over bubbles.

exploded because of improper bottling.

+WheresMyChallenge I challenge you guys to do this!!!!!!! Cmon Paul you can do eeeeet!

+Doom Video VaultAh. xDThat would suck indeed!

+w00tz0r9000i Vomiting out super hot stuff also burns on the way back up lol

Ah, a fried bunghole. :P

+w00tz0r9000i Other one :)

+Chuck From The Bronx Goddamn... You mean when you pissed it out, it also burned? :x

+WheresMyChallenge It was a lot more butual on the way out man :)

+Adam DiRocco It is parabolic. A sinusoidal motion would not be microgravity, but a specific parabola (like the motion of a ball tossed up) would be free falling and basically give a weightless environment inside of the aircraft.

+Scott Gauer My background in the hard sciences is quite adequate. Try to appreciate that I'm talking about new physics. Try to understand that if the inertial mass of the air around it were to fall to zero that the aerodynamic drag would also become near zero because it would take no force to swing air around it to equalize the pressure as it moves.

Maybe if you get a degree in either physics or engineering you could comprehend how what you just said makes no sense, at all.  Instaflow sounds like something I would hear on Instagram. 

+Scott Gauer They are not concerned with aerodynamics. You will notice the absence of propeller, jet and rockets. It's field propulsion and they suspend inertial mass of the air so it instaflows around the hull. They can fly flat surface forward through the air at tens of mach and not disturb the air at all.

+Dan Frederiksen If ET was as smart as you claim he is, he'd know that a saucer is probably the least aerodynamically stable shape for a flight vehicle.

+Scott Gauer you think moronic superficial impression disproves anything?try dealing with the facts at hand instead. little pesky details like the only nuclear weapons carrying base in the world at the time put out a press release that they had retrieved a crashed flying saucer. That was the term used. The day after, they announced it was a weather balloon. That's historical fact which you can verify in newspaper archives. Early July 1947.And that's a drop in the ocean of evidence. There is enough to be certain many times over that ET ships visit our planet. In rather great numbers no less.Try not to be so provincial and appreciate the size and age of the universe and the hundreds of millions of witnesses around the world.

Because it's all a conspiracy and Illuminati and Roswell.  Did I hit all they key words?  Let me know if I missed some.