Cosmetology school wasilla ak Videos

+166PolarBear its a triangular cut thats the way it is

+athompson7 & guess what? hair grows. i think this was a thoughtful thing that these girls decided to do; some people are not fortunate enough to grow long locks, where as their hair will eventually grow long again.

ok knowing that metal melt ue to high temperature is pretty easy and seriously you laugh at my logic while enforcing religion? im done arguing with you.

Your logic is laughable! What you should be asking yourself is this: how could SIMON PETER know that the last days would see the rise of Bible scoffers who would mock the CREATION, FLOOD, AND CHRIST'S SECOND COMING? This is just one of the hundreds of fulfilled prophesies that proves the divine inspiration of the Bible. How can a book that is always right about the future be ever wrong about the past? It is a trillion times more difficult to be right about the future than to be right about the past. In that same chapter in second Peter (3:10), it says that elements shall melt with a fervent heat. Skeptics laughed at that verse until 1945 when the first nuclear explosion took place. How could Simon Peter, an ignorant fisherman, know this over 1800 years before the great scientists of our modern world?

+Ross Guishard calling evolution a fairy tale by quoting the bible? you sir have a sense of humor. thanks for the laugh. and the one who deliberatly choose to believe a lie are creationist. you base your knowledge on a book that is old they had no idea what blood cells and such were. my "belief" are based on verifiable facts and crosschecking of information. and if the blood cells in dinosaure bones are the proof of jesus's second coming well then i cannot wait to meet him to ask him how pretentious and arrogant his followers came to be....

+xXEl1teVi0Xx No, it just shows that EVOLUTIONISTS have being lying all along It also proves the truthfulness of the Bible . In 2 Peter,chapter 3, the Bible predicts the rise of the modern-day scoffers. It says they "willingly are ignorant of " the Creation, Flood, and Christ's second coming. They deliberately choose to believe a lie ;and there ain't no bigger lie than the evolutionary fairytale.

+Ross Guishard ok i did some research : //www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur-shocker-115306469/?no-istAnd yeah non-decomposed soft tissues has been found in a 68 millions year old bone. so your argument that dinosaurs were alive much later than we thought is still not true. its just show that soft tissue, under the right circumstances can "survive" much longer than thought.

+xXEl1teVi0Xx What are you afraid of? Mary Schweiter of MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY was on 60 Minutes talking about her shocking discovery. SHE IS AN EVOLUTIONIST! Many others have also found soft tissue in other dino bones.what you should be angry about is this: how could this be known to some scientists since the 1990's and up to now MSM and the science journals and magazines(all controlled by evolutionists) have very little to say about it? Don't get angry at me ; save it for those for those in education and the media whose job is to deceive you. Jesus said", I am the Way ,the Truth,, and the Life; no man cometh unto the Father but by Me. " ;

yeah right. google is solid science. i could google a research to prove that vaccin cause autism. so yeah source or GTFO

+xXEl1teVi0Xx Just google "soft tissue found in dinosaur bones" and its all there.

+Ross Guishard sources?

+Casey Van Ummmm NO if a person can ignore such overwhelming science on this issue, what other overwhelming possibly life saving science might they also ignore??

+syntaxed2 It wasnt a theist who justified the only use of the atomic bomb in history (let alone creating it), it was a Democrat using what science created. It will be a Democrat who uses it again, no question about it.That said, I'm no religious nut. I just pay attention to history and its most major blunders.Theists have been in charge of that "button" many times for many terms, nothing happened, simply not so under Harry S Trumans watch. Of course its arguable whether or not it should EVER be used again. We will have to weigh the integrity of that decision based on the facts when that time comes. But for you to interject that it would be a theist is laughable considering that history. For now, for historical purposes as well as for Japans perspective on "who would push the preverbial button", I think we all know who are the most capable of "justifying" an unethical or immoral use of a weapon such as the atomic bomb.

You are singing to the choir. I couldn't agree with you more.

+Logan BYou are so easily deceived and then want to defend your deceptional illusions as if they  were true.  This is a dictionary definition of ignorance.  Are you so sure of everything that you are told is true ?  Reverse everything you accuse me of, that would be a good beginning. Don't believe anything until you know it's true and if you can't prove it, be skeptical.

Sorry I mentioned it.

"Why does science only discover what is already known?"So when you get the same consistent answers, you think it must be wrong? A conspiracy? "Strange how 1+1 always =s 2. Clearly its a set up, a conspiracy". "Strange how scientific discoveries never contradict that Gravity works the way it does" "Strange how the fact that the sun rises everyday matches with the science that is already known of the earths rotation. The fact that the sun continues to rise everyday, makes me suspect the science of the earth rotating, because if something doesn't contradict that science, then I suspect it isn't true"???"Does the Smithsonian burn evidence that doesn't fit into their established paradigms?  For fucks sake? or for profit ?" Oh My Gawd. There would be more profit in any new discoveries. The work that people put into scientific knowledge is incredible, but the way some people work so hard to be stupid is just horrifying. 

Well, when you believe all the history we have been force fed and then criticize any other possibilities, it's a wonder of contradictions and I'm not so sure if truth is even involved at that point. What makes what we are taught true ? Was anyone there ? Why does science only discover what is already known ? Does the Smithsonian burn evidence that doesn't fit into their established paradigms?  For fucks sake? or for profit ? You decided to buy what's being sold as well. We have the capacity to learn and change our views, this is what makes life so interesting.

Ah now the CIA is behind it. They existed in dinosaur times too.

The truth is this quote by William Casey, "We will know  our disinformation campaign is complete when everything everyone knows is false".             He was CIA or FBI Chief

+JUST SAYINGEither or will do.

+JUST SAYING The one that killed the dinasours...

OH FOR FUCKS SAKE!

Which one?

+JUST SAYING So how did humans survive the extinction event?

+JUST SAYING  Sighs

audio was off, a few transitions were rough, and if a camera isn't functioning correctly it shouldn't be used. Some good angles and high quality though.