Well-balanced on the whole. I found the vitamin D defence misleading
because I am sure the claim is not that low Vitamin D 'causes' cancer but
rather that those with cancer are found to have low Vitamin D levels, so
the hypothesis should be that low Vitamin D predisposes to, or perhaps
impairs the body's natural defence mechanisms against cancer. She does
talk about the questions around sunscreens, identifying the possibly
carcinogenic ingredients and says that more research is required. So
should we really be advising the public to keep slathering it on? I don't
think so.
+Jean Russell Vitamin D, at 50k IU a day was a patented treatment that was found to be highly effective for breast cancer in the 1920, until the University of Wisc. patents were overturned. I posted three effective and proven treatments for skin cancer on this thread and some books to read.
Melanoma, skin cancer is serious all avenues should be researched to save
lives, millions have been raised and spent to no avail. why have'nt our
governments done all in their power to scientifically prove or disprove
black salve??