Ragini MMS 2 Movie -- Review-by India's leading psychologist Dr sunderam
Dr P T Sunderam the leading on line psychologist of India, appreciates the hooro-sex Indian Hollywood movie. The role of psychiatrist played by Divya dutta is ...
WikiBear: John Holmes Edition
The Wikipedia-powered plush toy is chock-full of facts...and bloody tales of death and revenge. More CONAN @ //teamcoco.com/video Team Coco is the ...
i wish is was a real wiki bear but i can not find one for my sister if any
of you know where i could get comment where they are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thanks
I wish Conan wouldn't act every time like it's his first encounter with
WikiBear. We all know he's done WikiBear like 4 times now.
Suspension of disbelief = broken.
+ThisisAlan It's done with respect to the idea some/many viewers have never seen it before, and to reference a previous encounter without describing his function would neuter the premise and soften the punchlines. Additionally, describing his function is part and parcel of introductory exposition, so acting as if he's presenting WikiBear for the first time gels with the aforementioned wish to keep new viewers informed.Yes, he could supplement the introduction of the premise with addenda implying previous appearances (e.g. "We'd like to take a moment now to bring on a toy we had featured on the program a while back, but had to pull the plug when it started saying some...well, let's say inappropriate things."), but if the conceit is that Conan is appalled by its anecdotes and ultimately ends the segment every time, why would he bring him back? Conan's role as the straight man necessitates that he always present WikiBear as if it's the first time it's been revealed.In terms of "suspension of disbelief," that terminology is inapplicable to satire insofar as you're in on the joke. Every joke and bit is its own microcosm of self-reference and insulated narrative, and given Conan's brand of humor is permeated with absurdist stylings, being jarred by some perceived continuity foible is a moot point even if applicable.Perhaps that clarifies why these experienced comedians choose to perform the bit this way.
I agree. First time it's a shock, second time he supposedly had a software update, and at the third go you would expect it to behave like that. The greatest bit ever, but getting unworkable fast.
He doesn't have to open the skit with a drab and lazy opening like what you said... He could open by mentioning, "As some of you know, there's this teddy bear that can give you information on anything you ask it. It's like a stuffed Siri. There's been a recent updated version known as: (insert name of the current wikibear)"It isn't that difficult. And it's just a suggestion. Not like they'd actually take my advice.
+ThisisAlan Tell me then, how would this skit even be funny if Conan was like "Hey guys check out this wikibear, it says all these innapropriate things''. It would be horrible. That's part of the schtik.
THIS IS HOW CATHERINE THE GREAT DIE, IN THE TOILET.
On 16 November [O.S. 5 November] 1796, Catherine rose early in the morning
and had her usual morning coffee, soon settling down to work on papers at
her study. Her lady's maid, Maria Perekusikhina, had asked the Empress if
she had slept well, and Catherine reportedly replied she had not slept so
well in a long time.[73] Sometime after 9:00 that morning, Catherine went
to her dressing room and collapsed from a stroke while on the toilet.[74]
Worried by Catherine's absence, her attendant, Zakhar Zotov, opened the
door and peered in. Catherine's body was sprawled on the floor. Her face
appeared purplish, her pulse was weak, and her breathing was shallow and
laboured.[73] The servants lifted Catherine from the floor and brought her
to the bedroom. Some 45 minutes later, the royal court's Scottish
physician, Dr. John Rogerson, arrived and determined that Catherine had
suffered a stroke.[73][75] Despite all attempts to revive the Empress, she
fell into a coma from which she never recovered. Catherine was given the
last rites and died the following evening around 9:45.[75] An autopsy
performed on her body the next day confirmed the cause of death as
stroke.[76]
I don't hate MLP.
MLP is a children's show, so, what's wrong with entertaining children?
Bronies and Pegasisters is where I draw the 'HOLY SHIT, WHY?' line.
+SuperGenericMan They grow familiarized with the characters and grow special bonds or some shit like that. They are a very small part of the fandom so it's hard to get a detailed look at their phycology, especially since many trolls pretend to be cloppers to stigmatize the brony fandom.
+Blue Gamer I get it. You're a Brony. How do I know? Your fucking profile picture is a pony. We get it, you like the thing, why broadcast it to fucking everyone?
Nothings wrong with Bronies... Bronies are just like any other person who are talking in this chat... I wish people can just deal with the fact that all people are the same... if we like Ponies we like ponies... We still like other stuff too... Can we all just please get along :)
"But how can adults be interested in something that was originally made for chidren?" is a question that I really don't understand.If you really think that the original intention is the only thing that matters, does that mean that you don't drink coffee? Because caffeine is actually made by some plants as a poison to kill off any bugs that try to eat them. It wasn't ever meant for humans.Also, Coca Cola was poriginally supposed to be a substitue for morphine, to cure John Pembertons addiction to it, so you shouldn't use that either.Shaking hands was originally supposed to be a way of figuring out whether or not the person you're meeting is carrying a weapon in their sleeves, and the act of 'toasting' wa originally a way of finding out if your drink has been poisoned.The nazi symbol (the swastika) was originally a symbol of peace and harmony.My point is, just because it was meant for children doesn't mean that adults can't enjoy it too, and it doesn't mean that it should stay "for children only" forever. But you probably won't listen, or even read this. You're probably either going to ignore my comment or reply it saying something among the lines of "no! You are actually a stupidhead and bronies are abominations!" because that has been my experience with people on the internet so far. sigh
+SuperGenericMan It was actually specifically designed to have a diverse appeal. It wasn't as targeted as it is now, but it was nevertheless a fundamental part of the design.
How are you so easily shocked in this day and age? Bunch of people liking an animated show is what sends you shitting your pants? I personally am more amazed by the amount of support shit like ISIS has in islamic nations, or how they are not generally just crushed under massive local disapproval, now THAT is a "holy shit" situation if anything is. Bronies are just people who like pastel horses, nobody is getting hurt by them.