Was ist ghz beim pc Videos

+Wahyu Andika lag... cek vdeo ane yg"Test GTAV Laptop i3/2gb"...

+Serbian Phone Gameplay yes sir...

+Shkelqim Bicaj I guess yes but with some stuttering

+StehpeK nmany jg testing di PC Low Spek.... dr pd upgrade mnding bli mobo baru yg suport proc i3/i5/i7....

ah. okay. but i will try to install it.

+Ana Camille Toledo no you cannot. upgrade your ram, and your graphic card also your processor to like Intel Quad Core 3,00Ghz at least.

+Dicky Saputra sama itunya program itu

+Dicky Saputra sekalian fbnya ya

Obrigado. Tem gente que não entendeu intenção dos vídeos. Eu monto a config que cliente deseja. Se ele opta n por ssd e por hd sata 3 ok. Se ele n quer memórias aptas a overclok ok. Eu monto desde que não traga gargalo ao pc e que não prejudique realmente. Tenho minhas opiniões, porém sempre tem a pergunta da pra fazer um pc voltado a gamer com 1000? 1500. Na medida financeira do indivíduo eu monto. Sou exigente com os meus pcs pessoais. Mas como diz ditado cliente tem sempre a razão, monte algo que lhe deixe satisfeito. Abraços man.

Roda no high meu amigo, me add na steam jplachi

Não faça isso

sim mano quando eu montei esse pc ai eu não tinha noção nenhuma de pc

+tutoriais ao extremos A placa mãe precisar ser compativel com AM3+ se você por AM3 não vai encaixar o processador

+IMagine Fx Uma Coisa eu recomendar um PC.outra Coisa e Montar o pc que o cliente quer são duas coisas totalmente diferentes.Fiz a montagem de acordo com a vontade do cliente e de acordo com bolso dele.Mesmo com pecas custo Beneficio o computador atendeu alem das expectativas dele pelo custo beneficio que ele teve.

+Joao Hercilio Acredito que roda todos os jogos em full hd no ultra o BF4 e GTAV roda no ultra com uma boa taxa de fps

sim agora vamos supor se ela está saindo no valor de R$ 1000.00 porém são gasto totalmente no desempenho da placa, agora se for 950 gasto no desempenho da placa e 50 reais na embalagem... seria lucro 1000 no desempenho não concorda?

+WP em partes concordo com você. muitas marcas como exemplo TPLINK ninguém dava nada por ela e eu sempre falei que era potencial. ate hj a embalagem e simples. e na minha opiniao ela superou a DLINK que tanto o povo babava ovo. logo depois todo mundo na onda da CORSAIR DOMINATOR, eu fui de GSKILL e não me arrependo. no dia que meu amigo colocou a memoria no pc dele e nao passou de 3.8 GHZ e colocou as minhas e passou 4.2 GHZ ele quase quebrou as memorias na minha frente. POREM se tratando de UMA PLACA DE VÍDEO DE 1000 reais e mais que obrigação TODO O conteúdo em si ser de qualidade. tenho ate hj uma BOLSA DA XFX que veio com a fonte. A FONTE E MTO BOA E TEM O CONTEÚDO TOTAL SATISFATÓRIO. E NESSE SENTIDO QUE ME REFIRO

nunca penso totalmente ao contrario o consumidor que e  trouxa e compra embalagem eu não compro por marca ou embalagem e sim pelo o que ele faz! exemplo vamos usar uma marca de fontes chamada PCYES uma marca brasileiro que superou EVGA e CORSAIR nos teste, uma fonte simples possui um custo beneficio acessível e melhor que as de marcas! outra coisa são os Smartphone comprei um positivo s450 ypy e não me arrependo até hoje estou com ele a 6 meses e perfeito atendeu perfeitamente as minhas necessidades... paguei 300,00 R$ aprenda da valor ao seu dinheiro que você vai ver que embalagem não conta!

+WP a Embalagem Diz Muito sobre o produto.Os Erros começam ae. a Imagem que o produto traz faz a diferença.Digo isso pois sou Gerente de mtas lojas, trabalho com comercio sei exatamente oque estou dizendo Abraços

+MrMaxDestruction The case was originally part of a Fujitsu Siemens Scaleo 600 PC system.

+DoX Swooky They are somewhat popular over here...

+DrCassette Try BandiCam. it has a free trial and u can recoed up to 10 mins.

If I can ever get a screen capture program to work for me, I could do a little bit of Minecraft, but that would go to my other channel, XTV4U.

+DrCassette I know its a bit strange for your channel but could you do a lets play of minecraft? 

Yes, Minecraft is one of the few games I play. The other one is called Cities Skylines and that requires Steam.

+DrCassette Okay. i just saw Minecraft and Steam on ur desktop.

+bandbgamesroom No, I barely ever play any computer games. I need the processing power for video editing.

+DrCassette I know it may feel out of your comfort zone but.... Benchmarking is important to run when you first get your new computer build running so that way you will know what peak performance is and you should check it from time to time to make sure you are still running at your peak performance. Cinebench is a easy program to use and there are a lot of videos here on youtube showing what it does. It check your video card for frames per second and rates your CPU for all core computing and a single core test as well. No big deal if you don't want to but if your editing its important to be running at your best. I also do video editing and have been using adobe since the 1990's or so and own several of their suites. The machine I just replaced was the original i7 extreme that I purchased about 7 years ago. I am also a big fan of old electronics and have some real nice pieces like my 1970's 1,500 watt per 2 channels peaks phase linier gear

+richcali21 I don't really know anything about testing and benchmarks, so no, I don't think so.

Big boys pay the electricity bills and not only use GPU's for allday gaming ;) to be honest, if i where just a gamer i probably never pay for a high end card, anything in the range of an HD 7850/GTX660 is good enough to play even in 1080p and in that mid range the powerdraw diferential between nVIDIA and AMD is not so huge. Also you pay exponentially more for not so big performance lead when it comes to gaming, but on the compute side worths it because you can achieve higher productivity.

No, basically man i think i am going to sell my 7970 and go for the gtxx 780. cause nvidia seems to treat customers better. i was so happy with the 7970, but when i heard frame metering problem with crossfire, it just showed how many corners were being cut. its bullshi, because Nvidia rips off customers, but i guess i am going to hav eto pay the nvidia tax to get the quality. fuck this graphics industry. hopefully intel kills of Nvidia and AMD graphics companies.

Monitor's can't bottleneck I think. 60Hz shouldn't stutter if you are playing at above 60fps. Here is something a specialist said: "A monitor will not effect FPS if no v-sync is used. However, it will help if v-sync is enabled, as you get over twice as many changes to display a frame." So try turning of V-Sync. That way Nvidia is better with their addaptive V-Sync. If they go lower then 60fps they automaticly turn V-Sync on and of when it is needed.

It's about 5% slower (10% at the very most in the odd case), and as I say, unless you were to sit there monitoring a frame rate counter, you won't be able to tell the difference. A game won't be playable on the 7970, and unplayable on the 7950. Save your cash and go for a 7950,...or if you still decide on a 7970 - just make sure you don't go for the ghz edition. Such a waste of cash when you can overclock it yourself. Whatever you buy, enjoy. :)

This is very interesting, but how can l do that in games like skyrim that have no option of v-sync? I remember l had to manage the system file and turn it off from there, but nothing changes. So after houres of research l understood xfire can actually give you best performance in high fps or above 60hz. Im gonna get a new monitor anyway and lm gonna post you if something changes or not just to informe people so they can chose better than l did.

Nothing special about 7970 GHz edition, it's the new Catalyst 12.7 that really steal the show for AMD. Original 7970 is perform a lot better with the new driver. The bad news for Nvidia fans is Kepler perform really bad in "Dirt Showdown" game.. the new game with new rendering technology. In that game 7970 perform 50% better than GTX680.. wow. If more games are like this out there than it will be no contest.

Cheaper? What are you smoking? and "if you can get your hands is right" because they're never in stock. Truth is, 7970 GE beats the 680 on the highest resolutions/settings in almost all games, and the (much more) expensive 4GB version won't do much in that department. You can also do a shitload more with a AMD than with a gaming Kepler, since their compute power is utter shit.

Correct me if im wrong, but a single HD 7970 rapes even a GTX 690 when it comes about computing power, not to mention that GPU acelerated computing is gonna be implemented in next gen games incoming and that is allready acelerating apps by OpenCL implementations. So it has become a more productive and general purpose oriented hardware than nVIDIA's one.

I have to disagree. I think the nVidia guy bullshits a lot more than this guy. The nVidia guy seems like he's guessing a lot of the time. Like he doesn't actually know the answers and just rattles off bullshit to sound good. On top of that he acts like a little kid at christmas which makes it unprofessional. At least to me.

smoother and optimised ? Metro 2033 is nvidia's but better with 7970, dirt 2 & 3 is amd's but better with GTX680. in dirt showdown with maximum setting GTX680 = 44fps, 7970 GHz = 67 fps, this is not optimised or not, this is a disaster, I already wait 2 months for the fix and there is none.

Too late, l got my 2 7950 and lm planing to buy a new monitor that goes to 120Hz. They told me the reason why my 2hd7950 in xfire stutter is the low hz my monitor has, l mean 60hz are not enough so lm monitor bottleneck! WTF! Once l got the new monitor l will tell you if it changes or not.

7950 + an overclock. You'll never tell the difference unless looking at a frame rate counter. If you still end up going for a 7970, at least don't get a ghz edition. You can overclock it yourself in less than one minute and save a packet (even more if you go with the 7950 ;).

AMD and NVIDIA really brought there A game with this gen of gpus. I just picked up a 680 power edition and love it. The 7970 is probably better for multiple monitors but the wattage difference tipped the edge to get the 680. This competition is great for gpus moving forward

AMD/Ati has the best performance - price rate. You can compare a GTX 680 with a Radon HD 7970. You pay $490 for a GTX 680 on Newegg and you pay $380 for a HD 7970 and 3 games which cost about a total of $135 that you can sell. AMD has better bang for the buck.

AMD GPUs for price performance the best GPUs tel me one gpu like the 7770 from invidia in same price range and technology 28nm low wattage use 115.- euro in germany in self price range from nvidia the 550ti and it sucks whit performance and old card like 7770

Just google acheiva 2560x1440 or eBay it I have one and love it but before you get one read the reviews as there is a reason there so cheap I was lucky and got one with no dead pixels and runs at 120 hz but there are plenty that arnt so lucky

It's a good card and great addition to the market, fanboys should suck it and thank it's presence since it's some more stress on GPU market prices, 500$ for a actual gaming grade video card is madness to begin with, but every bit helps...

Important!!! Don't ever try Crossfire! I can't really tell how 2 or 3 HD7970 performe, but l got some ugly experience with 2 HD7950, microstuttering to death! Instead of better performance l got the opposit! All those money wasted :(

coreect me if im wrong, but the gtx 690 is smaller and consumes less power than the 7990, not to mention is the same size and doesn't sound like a jet engine. at least, thats the story on the ultra high end.

New monitor is fine. Force vsync on in your GPU's control panel. You will get much smoother, more consistent results this way, and the added benefit of the physics not going crazy it will help.

Seriously?, youtube still won't let me post links... seems like everyone else on Youtube is able to.. thanks Google :( Anyway it's linked on the front page of the pcper site :)